Waterboarding: Those Who Cannot Remember The Past

cross posted at The Dream Antilles

Waterboarding (read: torture) is nothing new.  It’s been around since the 15th century, and has a long, well documented history.  That history was briefly summed up by Ted Kennedy for Democracy Now:

It’s an ancient technique of tyrants. In the fifteenth and sixteenth century, it was used by interrogators in the Spanish Inquisition. In the nineteenth century, it was used against slaves in this country. In World War II, it was used against us by Japan. In the 1970s, it was used against political opponents by the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia and the military dictatorships of Chile and Argentina. Today, it’s being used against pro-democracy activists by the rulers of Burma. When we fail to reject waterboarding, this is the company that we keep. /snip

   Make no mistake about it: waterboarding is already illegal under United States law. It’s illegal under the Geneva Conventions, which prohibit outrages upon personal dignity, including cruel, humiliating and degrading treatment. It’s illegal under the Torture Act, which prohibits acts specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering. It’s illegal under the Detainee Treatment Act, which prohibits cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment. And it violates the Constitution. The nation’s top military lawyers and legal experts across the political spectrum have condemned waterboarding as torture. And after World War II, the United States prosecuted- prosecuted- Japanese officers for engaging in waterboarding. What more does this nominee need to enforce existing laws?

This essay isn’t about rehashing the many legal arguments about how waterboarding is torture and in violation of US and international law.  Instead, this essay recalls two recent, prominent instances in which the US itself prosecuted the use of waterboarding as a crime, as torture.  It raises this simple question: how can anyone who acknowledges this relatively recent history argue that waterboarding isn’t a crime and isn’t torture.  And how is it that our learned congresspersons haven’t forcefully confronted Bushco’s minions with this history?

Please join me below.

World War II

NPR reports:

In the war crimes tribunals that followed Japan’s defeat in World War II, the issue of waterboarding was sometimes raised. In 1947, the U.S. charged a Japanese officer, Yukio Asano, with war crimes for waterboarding a U.S. civilian. Asano was sentenced to 15 years of hard labor.

According to this Wiki:

The United States has a historical record of regarding waterboarding as a crime, and has prosecuted individuals for the use of the practice in the past. In 1947, the United States prosecuted a Japanese military officer, Yukio Asano, for carrying out a form of waterboarding on a U.S. civilian during World War II. Yukio Asano received a sentence of 15 years of hard labor. The charges of Violation of the Laws and Customs of War against Asano also included “beating using hands, fists, club; kicking; burning using cigarettes; strapping on a stretcher head downward.”

The WaPo described what Asano did:

The subject was strapped on a stretcher that was tilted so that his feet were in the air and head near the floor, and small amounts of water were poured over his face, leaving him gasping for air until he agreed to talk.

And then there’s the record of the conviction.  And this article that provides the specifications (starting on page 18) on which Asano and others were tried.  These included “water torture”, which the charges described:

Specification 1: That in or about July or August, 1943, the accused Yukio Asano, did willfully and unlawfully, brutally mistreat and torture Morris O. Killough, an American Prisoner of War, by beating and kicking him; by fastening him on a stretcher and pouring water up his nostrils.

Specification 2: That on or about 15 May, 1944, at Fukoka Prisoner of War Branch Camp

Number 3, Kyushu, Japan, the accused Yukio Asano, did, willfully and unlawfully, brutally

mistreat and torture Thomas B. Armitage, William O Cash and Munroe Dave Woodall,

American Prisoners of War by beating and kicking them, by forcing water into their mouths and noses; and by pressing lighted cigarettes against their bodies.

Specification 5. That between 1 April, 1943 and 31 December, 1943, the accused Yukio Asano, did, willfully and unlawfully, brutally mistreat and torture John Henry Burton, an American Prisoner of War, by beating him; and by fastening him head downward on a stretcher and forcing water into his nose.

And there’s the testimony of victims of these crimes.

It seems clear enough that if what Asano (and others) did was not torture, Bush and Mukasey need to issue him a pardon.  But, alas, Asano isn’t alone.  The issue arose again in Vietnam two decades later.  And with the same results: waterboarding was criminal and it was torture.  

Vietnam

NPR reports:

On Jan. 21, 1968, The Washington Post ran a front-page photo of a U.S. soldier supervising the waterboarding of a captured North Vietnamese soldier. The caption said the technique induced “a flooding sense of suffocation and drowning, meant to make him talk.” The picture led to an Army investigation and, two months later, the court martial of the soldier.

The photo:

Photobucket

According to this Wiki:

Waterboarding was designated as illegal by U.S. generals in the Vietnam War. On January 21, 1968, The Washington Post published a controversial photograph of an American soldier supervising the waterboarding of a North Vietnamese POW near Da Nang. The article described the practice as “fairly common.” The photograph led to the soldier being court-martialled by a U.S. military court within one month of its publication, and he was thrown out of the army. Another waterboarding photograph of the same scene is also exhibited in the War Remnants Museum at Ho Chi Minh City.

 Cited source

The original WaPo article is here (pdf format, redacted).

These two cases do not involve statutory construction, a close reading of the texts of treaties, arcane principles of international law.  They don’t require extensive analysis.  The facts are incontrovertible: in World War II and in Vietnam the US prosecuted “waterboarding” as a crime and as torture.  And now, Mukasey, like Abu AG before him, and like other Bushco officials criminals have the gall to argue that “waterboarding” somehow isn’t a crime.  That proposition is laughable.  They deserve not only our contempt.  They deserve to be impeached and prosecuted.

Yeah, and….

Something I would be shot for if I posted on Dkoes….

I don’t like Obama, I admit it. Why? Because he has become everything to just about everybody which often means he really stands for nothing. Call me a cynic, call me jaded, call me bitter but his ability to sway people by saying basically nothing in his speeches is what concerns me.

I don’t go to rallies because I want to stay objective and I hate being in rooms with people who are so swept up by their emotions that they can be easily twisted for any goal. Is it nice to see that someone on our side has this ability? Sure. Does it mean that I expect him to actually fix anything major, no.

I read his speeches, I really do not like listening to him because as my mom says “It seems like he is beating me over the head and yelling at me.” To me, he sounds like a preacher, which I really don’t like. At any rate, I read his speeches and I am left with “Ok, and??” He takes 1000s of words to wind down to saying something specific, which is still couched and vague so he really commits to nothing. His speeches sound great, but his plans are nothing spectacular. For instance: Obama’ Education plan.

The Problem

No Child Left Behind Left the Money Behind: The goal of the law was the right one, but unfulfilled funding promises, inadequate implementation by the Education Department and shortcomings in the design of the law itself have limited its effectiveness and undercut its support. As a result, the law has failed to provide high-quality teachers in every classroom and failed to adequately support and pay those teachers.

Students Left Behind: Six million middle and high school students read significantly below their grade level. A full third of high school graduates do not immediately go on to college. American 15 year olds rank 28th out of 40 countries in mathematics and 19th out of 40 countries in science. Almost 30 percent of students in their first year of college are forced to take remedial science and math classes because they are not prepared.

High Dropout Rate: America has one of the highest dropout rates in the industrialized world. Only 70 percent of U.S. high school students graduate with a diploma. African American and Latino students are significantly less likely to graduate than white students.

Teacher Retention is a Problem: Thirty percent of new teachers leave within their first five years in the profession.

Soaring College Costs: College costs have grown nearly 40 percent in the past five years. The average graduate leaves college with over $19,000 in debt. And between 2001 and 2010, 2 million academically qualified students will not go to college because they cannot afford it. Finally, our complicated maze of tax credits and applications leaves too many students unaware of financial aid available to them.

Barack Obama’s Plan

Early Childhood Education

   * Zero to Five Plan: Obama’s comprehensive “Zero to Five” plan will provide critical support to young children and their parents. Unlike other early childhood education plans, Obama’s plan places key emphasis at early care and education for infants, which is essential for children to be ready to enter kindergarten. Obama will create Early Learning Challenge Grants to promote state “zero to five” efforts and help states move toward voluntary, universal pre-school.

   * Expand Early Head Start and Head Start: Obama will quadruple Early Head Start, increase Head Start funding and improve quality for both.

   * Affordable, High-Quality Child Care: Obama will also provide affordable and high-quality child care to ease the burden on working families.

     K-12

         o Reform No Child Left Behind: Obama will reform NCLB, which starts by funding the law. Obama believes teachers should not be forced to spend the academic year preparing students to fill in bubbles on standardized tests. He will improve the assessments used to track student progress to measure readiness for college and the workplace and improve student learning in a timely, individualized manner. Obama will also improve NCLB’s accountability system so that we are supporting schools that need improvement, rather than punishing them.

         o Make Math and Science Education a National Priority: Obama will recruit math and science degree graduates to the teaching profession and will support efforts to help these teachers learn from professionals in the field. He will also work to ensure that all children have access to a strong science curriculum at all grade levels.

         o Address the Dropout Crisis: Obama will address the dropout crisis by passing his legislation to provide funding to school districts to invest in intervention strategies in middle school – strategies such as personal academic plans, teaching teams, parent involvement, mentoring, intensive reading and math instruction, and extended learning time.

         o Expand High-Quality Afterschool Opportunities: Obama will double funding for the main federal support for afterschool programs, the 21st Century Learning Centers program, to serve one million more children.

         o Expand Summer Learning Opportunities: Obama’s “STEP UP” plan addresses the achievement gap by supporting summer learning opportunities for disadvantaged children through partnerships between local schools and community organizations.

         o Support College Outreach Programs: Obama supports outreach programs like GEAR UP, TRIO and Upward Bound to encourage more young people from low-income families to consider and prepare for college.

         o Support English Language Learners: Obama supports transitional bilingual education and will help Limited English Proficient students get ahead by holding schools accountable for making sure these students complete school.

     Recruit, Prepare, Retain, and Reward America’s Teachers

         o Recruit Teachers: Obama will create new Teacher Service Scholarships that will cover four years of undergraduate or two years of graduate teacher education, including high-quality alternative programs for mid-career recruits in exchange for teaching for at least four years in a high-need field or location.

         o Prepare Teachers: Obama will require all schools of education to be accredited. He will also create a voluntary national performance assessment so we can be sure that every new educator is trained and ready to walk into the classroom and start teaching effectively. Obama will also create Teacher Residency Programs that will supply 30,000 exceptionally well-prepared recruits to high-need schools.

         o Retain Teachers: To support our teachers, Obama’s plan will expand mentoring programs that pair experienced teachers with new recruits. He will also provide incentives to give teachers paid common planning time so they can collaborate to share best practices.

         o Reward Teachers: Obama will promote new and innovative ways to increase teacher pay that are developed with teachers, not imposed on them. Districts will be able to design programs that reward accomplished educators who serve as a mentor to new teachers with a salary increase. Districts can reward teachers who work in underserved places like rural areas and inner cities. And if teachers consistently excel in the classroom, that work can be valued and rewarded as well.

     Higher Education

         o Create the American Opportunity Tax Credit: Obama will make college affordable for all Americans by creating a new American Opportunity Tax Credit. This universal and fully refundable credit will ensure that the first $4,000 of a college education is completely free for most Americans, and will cover two-thirds the cost of tuition at the average public college or university and make community college tuition completely free for most students. Obama will also ensure that the tax credit is available to families at the time of enrollment by using prior year’s tax data to deliver the credit when tuition is due.

         o Simplify the Application Process for Financial Aid: Obama will streamline the financial aid process by eliminating the current federal financial aid application and enabling families to apply simply by checking a box on their tax form, authorizing their tax information to be used, and eliminating the need for a separate application.

and my pick Edwards:

 

Offer Universal “Great Promise” Preschool to Four-Year-Olds

Edwards will provide resources to states to help them offer universal high-quality preschool programs for four-year-olds. Great Promise programs will:

   * Teach academic skills: Preschool is much more than babysitting; it is a unique opportunity to teach children the skills they will need in school. Great Promise will help develop children’s language abilities and introduce them to early math, reading, and other academic concepts, as well as help develop their social and emotional skills.

   * Start in needy communities: The federal commitment will begin in low-income neighborhoods where schools are struggling and expand to serve more communities over time.

   * Be led by excellent teachers: Research shows that the most effective preschool teachers have at least a bachelor’s degree. Lead teachers in Great Promise will have four-year college degrees and be paid commensurately.

   * Involve parents and their families: Research shows that preschool benefits children the most when their parents are involved. Parental involvement will be essential to Great Promise.

   * Be voluntary and universally affordable: Participation would be fully voluntary for families. Tuition would be charged on a sliding scale based upon family income and waived for children from low-income families.

Create National Smart Start

North Carolina’s innovative Smart Start initiative promotes the healthy development of children under the age of five. It helps local partnerships make child care higher quality and more affordable, provides health services and supports families. Participating children show better cognitive and language skills and fewer behavioral problems. Edwards will help other states duplicate Smart Start programs, prioritizing children who are not served by other pre-K programs. Smart Start will:

   * Offer integrated services for young children: By linking together health care, child care, education, and family support services for children under five, Smart Start addresses all aspects of young children’s development and helps them begin school healthy and ready to succeed.

   * Perform health care outreach: Smart Start makes it easier for young children to get screening for health problems related to hearing, speech, vision, dental, and learning disabilities.

   * Sponsor home visits to new families: Home visits improve prenatal health and the quality of caregiving after birth. Children receiving nurse visits are cognitively more advanced, have fewer behavioral problems, and are less likely to be abused or neglected. The Smart Start program will fund home visits by registered nurses to 50,000 low-income new parents. [AAP, 2004; RJWF, 2006; NFP, 2006]

An Excellent Teacher in Every Classroom

Nothing is more important in a school than the relationship between a teacher and a child. In a single year, a good teacher can raise student achievement by a full grade level more than a less effective teacher. Yet students with the greatest needs are more likely to have less experienced and effective teachers. Poor urban and rural schools in particular struggle to attract and retain excellent teachers. While pay for CEOs and other highly paid workers skyrocketed in recent years, teachers earn a fraction of the salaries paid to other educated professionals.

John Edwards believes we need to invest more in training and paying our teachers to help every child learn at high levels. As president, he will:

Raise Pay by up to $15,000 More for Teachers in High-Poverty Schools

Two-thirds of states do not offer any incentives of any kind for teachers to work in high-poverty schools, and many veteran teachers choose to teach in other schools. Edwards will fundamentally change teachers’ incentives by helping states pay teachers in successful high-poverty schools as much as $15,000 more a year. The $15,000 raise includes:

   * $5,000 for all teachers in successful high-poverty schools: High-poverty schools with high academic performance, good student behavior, and high parent satisfaction could give up to $5,000 in bonuses to each of their teachers, encouraging a schoolwide culture of success. Bonuses will grow over time to reward continuing success and give teachers an incentive to stay. Successful schools will open their doors to share their experiences with other schools.

   * $5,000 for teachers with national certification for excellence in high-poverty schools: The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards certifies excellent teachers, but few of these teachers teach in high-need schools. Teachers who have demonstrated high effectiveness in a national process, such as National Board certification, will be eligible for the higher pay.

   * $5,000 for veteran teachers who serve as mentors in high-poverty schools: Giving veteran teachers the opportunity to mentor new teachers creates opportunities for career advancement for longtime successful teachers, while providing much-needed guidance to new teachers.

To address other recruitment hurdles, Edwards will help states and school districts improve working conditions and increase time for teacher collaboration and planning. He will also address barriers for teachers moving between states by encouraging reciprocal credentials and studying ways to make pension plans compatible. [NCTAF, 1996 and 2002; Sanders and Rivers, 1996; Jordan, Mednro, and Weerasinghe, 1997; Peske and Haycock, 2006; Rural School and Community Trust, 2006 and 2007; NY Times, 8/27/2007]

Create a National Teacher University

While there are some successful education schools, many future teachers graduate without the skills and knowledge they need. In one survey, more than 60 percent of graduates said their education school did not prepare them. Because having great teachers is a national priority, Edwards will create a national teachers’ university – a West Point for teachers – to recruit 1,000 top college students a year, train them to be excellent teachers, and encourage them to teach where they are needed most. The school will waive tuition for students who go on to teach in schools and subject areas facing shortages. It will also lead improvements at education schools nationwide by developing and sharing model curriculum and practices and serve as a forum to promote shared certification and licensing requirements across states. [Levine, 2006]

Help Teachers in Their Early Years

A third of all new teachers leave the profession within three years. Students in high-poverty and high-minority schools are twice as likely as other students to be taught by inexperienced teachers. Edwards will help states support teachers during their early years. He will encourage a transition year for rookie teachers with smaller class sizes, reduced teaching loads, and minimal extra duties. Resources will support structured mentoring programs pairing new teachers with successful veterans. Finally, he will support professional development based in actual classroom needs. [Ingersoll, 2003; Ed Trust, 2007; Levine, 2006; NCATF, 2006]

Reduce Class Sizes

Smaller classes help students learn more by allowing them to get more individualized attention from teachers. According to a Tennessee study, young students in small classes are less likely to drop out of school and more likely to graduate on time, complete more advanced math and English courses, and receive honors. Poor and African-American students gain the most from smaller classes. Edwards will dedicate federal resources to reduce class sizes, particularly for young children who are learning below grade levels. [Krueger and Whitmore, 2001, 2002; Smith, Molnar, and Zahorik, 2003; U.S. Department of Education, 2000]

Train More Excellent Principals

Principals can have a large impact on student achievement by setting high expectations and recruiting and supporting teachers, but many districts face principal shortages and the turnover rate for principals in poor urban and rural districts is as high as 20 percent a year. Edwards will help train excellent principals for high-need schools. Programs could be operated by schools of education, school districts, business schools, or other non-profits with a proven track record like New Leaders for New Schools. Establishing programs to train 3,000 principals a year will meet the needs of most of the country’s high-need urban and rural schools. [Education Sector, 2007; Aspen Commission, 2007; Leithwood et al. 2004; Education Week, 9/12/2007]

Use Highly Qualified Teachers for Tutoring

No Child Left Behind requires schools that fail to make adequate progress for three years in a row to set aside up to 20 percent of their Title I funds to pay for “supplemental service” tutoring programs, often offered by private companies with unproven capabilities. Edwards will require that tutors be highly qualified teachers.

Making Every School an Outstanding School

Every child in America should have the chance to attend an outstanding public school that has high expectations for every child. Children need to master both basic skills in reading, writing and math and advanced thinking skills like creativity, analytic thinking and using technology. We cannot tolerate the benign neglect of our schools. No Child Left Behind has lost its way by imposing cheap standardized tests, narrowing the curriculum at the expense of science, history, and the arts and mandating unproven cookie-cutter reforms on schools. As a result, it has lost the support of teachers, principals, and parents, whose support is needed for any reform to succeed.

John Edwards believes that we need to overhaul No Child Left Behind to center our schools around children, not tests, and help struggling schools, not punish them. He will:

Overhaul No Child Left Behind

The law must be radically changed to live up to its goal of helping all children learn at high levels, accurately identifying struggling schools, and improving them. Its sole reliance on standardized, primarily multiple choice reading and math tests has led schools to narrow the curriculum. Its methodology for identifying failing school can be arbitrary and unfair. And it imposes mandatory, cookie-cutter reforms on these schools without any evidence they work. Edwards supports:

   * Better tests:Rather than requiring students to take cheap standardized tests, Edwards believes that we must invest in the development of higher-quality assessments that measure higher-order thinking skills, including open-ended essays, oral examinations, and projects and experiments.

   * Broader measures of school success: Edwards believes that the law should consider additional measures of academic performance. The law should also allow states to track the growth of students over time, rather than only counting the number of students who clear an arbitrary bar, and give more flexibility to small rural schools.

   * More flexibility: Edwards will give states more flexibility by distinguishing between schools where many children are failing and those where a particular group is falling behind. He will also let states implement their own reforms in underperforming schools when there is good reason to believe that they will be at least equally effective.

Launch a “Great Schools” Initiative to Build and Expand 1,000 Successful Schools

Across America, there are public schools that are helping children from all backgrounds succeed, including traditional public schools, public charter schools, small schools, and other models. Edwards will help 250 schools a year expand or start new branches. Federal funds will support new buildings, excellent teachers, and other needs. Among the schools he will support are:

   * Small schools: Small high schools create stronger communities, reducing adolescent anonymity and alienation and encouraging teachers to work together. At 47 new small high schools recently opened in New York City, graduation rates are substantially higher than the citywide average. Communities can establish multiple schools within an existing facility, build new schools, and reopen old facilities. [Aspen Institute, 2001; N.Y. Times, 6/30/2007]

   * Early college high schools: High schools on college campuses let students earn both a high school diploma and an associate’s degree (or two years of transfer credit) in only five years. In North Carolina, Governor Mike Easley’s Learn and Earn initiative raises rigor and aspirations, reduces tuition costs, and relieves overcrowded college campuses. [American Institutes for Research and SRI International, 2007; Easley, 2007]

   * Economically integrated schools: While income diversity is not a substitute for racial diversity, low-income students perform best when in middle-class schools where they are more likely to have experienced teachers and classmates with high aspirations. States can build magnet schools in low-income communities and create incentives for middle-class schools to enroll more low-income children. [Kahlenberg, 2007; Harris, 2006; NY Times, 7/15/05]

Create a School Success Fund to Turn Around Struggling Schools

Improving our worst schools is going to take more than federal mandates of unproven remedies; it will require a serious commitment of resources. A new School Success Fund will:

   * Let experts design and implement reforms: Based on North Carolina’s successful reform, Edwards will ask teams of experienced educators to spend a year at struggling schools helping start reforms. These educators will tailor comprehensive solutions to each school, rather than adopting silver bullets or one-size-fits-all solutions.

   * Provide resources to implement them: Some schools need more resources to help their children succeed. The School Success Fund will target resources to the neediest schools. Resources will be available to recruit new school leadership and a core of excellent teachers, reduce class sizes, duplicate proven models, strengthen the curriculum, and other reforms.

   * Emphasize extra learning time: Due to our 180-day school year, American children spend much less time in class than their foreign competitors. Many other countries have 25 percent more instructional time, which adds up to more than two years by the end of high school. When combined with making better use of learning time and designed with educators, longer school days and years create new opportunities for children to master the basics and a broader curriculum. [ED in 08, 2007; Zimmerman, 1998; CAP, 2006]

   * Establish stronger academic and career curricula: The rigor of high school classes is the number-one predictor of college success. Even students who do not go to college need strong math and reading skills in the workplace. Edwards believes that all schools xE2x80x93 even those in small, isolated, and high-poverty areas – should have access to challenging Advanced Placement courses. And he will support partnerships between high schools and community colleges to help high school students get the training they need for the good jobs where skilled workers are in short supply today. [US Department of Education, 1997; ACT, 2006; ED in 08, 2007]

More Resources for Poor and Rural Schools

Four out of five urban school districts studied nationally spend more on low-poverty schools than on high-poverty schools. Rural schools enroll 40 percent of American children – including most children in Iowa, New Hampshire, and North Carolina – but receive only 22 percent of federal education funding. Edwards will increase federal Title I funding and dedicate the increases to low-income schools and districts and rewarding states that distribute funding where it is needed most to increase learning. He will also invest in distance education and cutting-edge software to bring the promise of new learning technologies to remote areas. [NASBE, 2003; Rural School and Community Trust, 2007; Digital Promise, 2003]

Meet the Promise of Special Education

More than thirty years ago, Congress committed to fund 40 percent of the excess cost of educating children with disabilities, but it provides less than half that amount. George Bush has proposed a $300 million cut. Edwards opposes the Bush cuts and supports getting on a path toward meeting the federal promise. [Committee for Education Funding, 2007]

Raise Graduation Rates

Almost a third of all students drop out of school before earning a high school diploma, and rates among children of color or from low-income families are higher. At nearly 2,000 high schools nationwide – called “dropout factories” – more than 40 percent of students won’t graduate. Edwards will create multiple paths to graduation such as Second Chance schools for former dropouts and smaller alternative schools for at-risk students. He will focus on identifying at-risk students and support the Striving Readers literacy program and one-on-one tutoring to keep them in school. Edwards will also fund additional guidance counselors in high-poverty schools. [Baron, 2005; Alliance for Excellent Education, 2007; Balfranz and Legters, 2004; NCES, 2004]

Support High School Service Programs

The energy and enthusiasm of high school students who want to make their community and their country a better place to live. One type of service program, service-learning, has been shown to have positive impacts on students’ civic engagement, college enrollment, career development, and personal relationships. Nearly half of school-age children lack the activities and role models that are opportunities to make a difference through helping others. Edwards will create a Community Corps service programs for high school students. It will provide resources to high schools that choose to make community service a graduation requirement, helping them make service opportunities higher in quality and integrate them into the curriculum. [NYLC, 2006; America’s Promise Alliance, undated]

I am posting them in their entirety because I think it is important to see the differences.

Notice Edwards adds a lot more into his plan, more about smaller class sizes, more dollar amounts as to what the teachers could expect, more about rural education, a service corps for kids that will help them meet those extra requirements, more about helping teachers be able to switch between states etc.

When I read Obama’s plans, it’s like reading an outline that touches on the things that really upset people the most so he can make people think he will fix things. Edwards’ is like a finished product. I know Edwards is out of the race but sometimes I don’t understand people. Edwards also has a habit of telling you how he would pay for it. Obama’s plans are good, but he has a habit of making me wonder about how much he will actually fight for them. I can’t get out of my head that as much as he hated this war according to his all important one speech, he kept voting to fund it; which means he funded torture, he funded Blackwater, he funded Gitmo, he funded all the corruption and kickbacks. When this is told to his supporters, they say “Well we are already there, defunding would just hurt the troops.” Then they turn around and blame Edwards for co sponsoring the AUMF and overlook the fact that later Edwards voted to not give Bush a blank check. It really is “Obama can do no wrong.” At least I will admit Edwards was stupid with the AUMF. They won’t with Obama.

I know we are not really supposed to write candidate diaries but I saw the one about Obama in NOLA. Once again he is talking really well, but where has he been since Hurricane Katrina? Did he make it the centerpiece of his campaign? No. Did he go down or take people there to help rebuild? No. Was he out there protesting the treatment of NOLA after the hurricane happened? No. PRoviding any grand speeches or leadership? No. So what really is he offering us that we do not already get from the Dem leadership, pretty speeches, lots of promises but little or no actual results.  

Drum Soldier Killed by Police 2-09-08 {UpDated – Statement}

Could this be another case of PTSD or TBI, it hasn’t been reported, as yet, on wether this soldier was an Iraq or Afgan, or both, Veteran.

Solider shot and killed on Fort Drum

Two officers arrived at the home, but when they made contact with the soldier he pulled out a gun and threatened them.

Here’s the News 10 Video Report

This report goes just abit deeper

Two Fort Drum police officers,

one military policeman and one Department of the Army civilian police

officer, responded to the residence.

The responding officers made contact with the Soldier and his spouse.

The Soldier later produced a concealed weapon and subdued the two

responding police officers.

A second civilian Fort Drum police officer responded to the scene and

heard a gunshot upon entering the residence. After a discussion with the

Soldier, the second responding officer heard a second gunshot, entered

the residence and discharged his weapon, hitting the Soldier several

times.

I will be checking back into this, probably in my old hometown paper and news channels, to see if I can update with more information. I’ll also pull this if just from a domestic violence, as first reported, and no possiblity to any Combat Experiance and results from.

UpDate:

Soldier is ID’ed

The soldier killed during an altercation with Fort Drum police early Saturday was a member of the 10th Mountain Division’s 3rd Brigade Combat Team, the base public information officer said Saturday night.

Staff Sgt. Dustin J. McMillen, 29, was an infantryman assigned to 2nd Battalion, 87th Infantry Regiment.He did a tour in Afghanistan and returned with his unit in June 2007.

McMillen joined the Army in December 1998 and was assigned to Fort Drum in September 2004.

McMillen is survived by his wife and three children. Leaders of the 2-87 Infantry are working to care for the family, according to a statement from Fort Drum.

Updated – Statement

Fort Drum helps grieving family

Soldier held police at gunpoint following 9-1-1 call

By Katrina Smith

Posted: Sunday, February 10, 2008 at 11:00 a.m.

Fort Drum releases statement regarding death of Staff Sgt.Dustin McMillen:

FORT DRUM – On behalf of Maj. Gen. Michael Oates and all the Soldiers and civilians who call Fort Drum home, I would like to offer our deepest condolences to the family and friends of Staff Sgt. Dustin McMillen.

This has been a terrible tragedy for everyone concerned and our primary concern right now is to take care of the physical and emotional needs of his family as well as those of the officers involved in yesterday’s shooting.

We have relocated the McMillen family to temporary housing here on post, and the unit chaplain has been assisting them with counseling since early yesterday. It has been a difficult time for the family – we are doing, and will continue to do, the very best we can to take care of their needs.

Yesterday’s shooting is still under investigation, but this is what we know right now:

About 1:30 a.m. on Feb 9., the Directorate of Emergency Services received a 9-1-1 hang-up from 9934-B Saratoga Rd., Fort Drum. A patrol was dispatched to investigate. Upon arrival, two officers met with Staff Sgt. Dustin McMillen, who informed them the 9-1-1 call was a misunderstanding.

As the officers were gathering information regarding the situation, Staff Sergeant McMillen, without warning, produced a concealed handgun and ordered the police officers to surrender their weapons.

A second patrol, responding to the scene, entered the residence and discovered Staff Sgt. McMillen holding the two police officers in the residence at gunpoint.

The second group of officers identified themselves and attempted to communicate with Staff Sgt. McMillen to get him to surrender. Staff Sgt.

McMillen fired two shots in the general direction of the second group of officers. One of those officers, after getting into a position to witness Staff Sgt. McMillen holding the first two officers at gunpoint, fired two shots at Staff Sgt. McMillen, hitting him twice.

Staff Sgt. McMillen was apprehended alive, and transported by EMTs to Samaritan Medical Center in Watertown where he was subsequently pronounced dead.

An autopsy of Staff Sgt. McMillen was conducted Saturday, and preliminary findings are consistent with the sequence of events described to investigators.

Staff Sgt. Dustin J. McMillen, 29, was an infantryman assigned to 2nd Battalion, 87th Infantry Regiment, 3rd Brigade Combat Team.

McMillen joined the Army in December 1998 and served at Fort Campbell and Hohenfels, Germany before his assignment to Fort Drum in September 2004.

By all accounts, Soldiers in the 10th Mountain Division who served with Staff Sgt. McMillen describe him as a solid Soldier, both as a squad leader in Afghanistan, and platoon sergeant here at Fort Drum.

To our knowledge he had not been referred nor sought counseling for any battle-related illnesses or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.

He is survived by his wife and three children.

As I said earlier, our focus now is to ensure the family’s needs are taken care of and that all the emergency professionals who responded to this incident receive any counseling assistance they require.

Pony Party: History Bites

When I was a young calico I went to Ferndale public school grades K-8 and we sang Oh Canada, God Save the Queen, and muttered the Lord’s Prayer. I always though of the Queen as this nice lady who came to visit once in a while, so of like a distant aunt.

Later in high school I learned that Canada won the 1812 War. This is how it was taught to us: Britain/Canada won the 1812 War because Canada did not become America. In the context of how the average Canadian thinks, it makes sense. Winning doesn’t always men you get something extra like a new territory, sometimes winning is getting to keep what you have.

But I got to thinking what if Americans don’t know about the 1812 War and how it turned out? What if they think they won that one to?

So as a public service…. I offer this description of the 1812 War….

Song by Three dead Trolls in a Baggie.

Here is a bonus alternative version of God Save the Queen….

Catchy one hit wonder for the young and young at heart….

Thanks for stopping by. Hang out and chit chat but please don’t rec pony party, go read some of the excellent offerings on the rec’d and recent list.

Interlopers

( – promoted by buhdydharma )

There is an icy wind coming, but it is not here yet.  Instead, the air is still, 19 degrees.  Everything is grayish-white, surrounded what the weather.gov site calls a “freezing fog*.”  It suits my mood, so I slip outside for a morning’s walk.

I live in an uncertain neighborhood.  

Walking south, first uphill and then steeply down, I slip through an extravagant, old-money that never-needed-revitalization neighborhood — the sort of place where people used to build replica English mansions.  When I walk this neighborhood, I am an interloper.  My Walmart boots clop uncomfortable and clumsy on sidewalks intended for Asolos and Timberlands, my Goodwill sweater signals no kinship to the Lands’ End natives.  They watch me, uncertain. Slow down the Lexus long enough to look, to judge, to dismiss.  No calls to 911 as long as I stay in the street, as long as I keep moving.  I’m an object of constant suspicion when I walk, a matter of heightened concern if I stop.  The gentry are easily riled, so I keep walking.

A half-mile, more or less, and I drop down a steep slope to the Raccoon River.  As densely wooded as the city will tolerate, the Greenwood Trail — a strip of concrete with a yellow line intended for Adidas and Jamis Satellites — runs along it’s banks.  During the good weather months, I avoid the trail.  The trail can be pretty unnerving, even terrifying.  Shambling along with their barely-restrained dogs — the loose-tongued, re-shaped, Dali-esque descendants of wolves — the walkers glance up with narrowed eyes. Bicyclists shoot past unexpectedly, yelling, “Left!”  Then, most disturbing of all, come the zombie joggers . . . nylon-thewed, glassy eyed, heads all full of Ipod juice, disconected from the world around them.  Everyone has a cell phone.

But this is not good weather.  No one is crazy enough.  So it is only the slow sound of ice.  Startled, some deer watch me deep-eyed and high-eared — but I keep moving — look, judge, dismiss.  I turn and whisper to them, “I know how you feel.”  They don’t answer, I’ve already been dismissed.

The neighborhood has A Problem with the deer.  Like most problems, it all comes down to sex and territory.  The deer keep having sex and then, in the opinion of the neighborhood if not in the opinion of the deer, there are Too Many Deer.  Too Many Deer do not stay in the woods by the river.  Too Many Deer don’t stay down where they belong.  Too Many Deer move back north into the groomed lawns and gardens.  They are interlopers who fail to keep moving. Too Many Deer linger and fuck and eat the dahlias and crap in the koi ponds.  

The neighborhood wanted action.  And action they had.  The city listens to this neighborhood.

The Des Moines City Council may allow bow hunters into residential neighborhoods they weren’t allowed into previously to thin burgeoning metro herds.

“The deer population is too high,” said Don Tripp, of Des Moines Parks and Recreation. “It’s eating plants. It’s creating safety issues within neighborhoods of deer crossing roadways.”

Controlled hunts within city limits have been allowed for years. Officials said those hunters are responsible for keeping the population in check.

Under the new ordinance, more properties would qualify as hunting ground. If the proposed ordinance passes, bow hunters could hunt within 100 feet of homes. Under the current ordinance, they have to stand back twice as far.

But it is safe now.  Too Many Deer lie quiet amid the snow drifts and watch me pass.  I am getting chilled.  The fog congeals around my beard and I fantasize climbing Everest, my ruggedly handsome English face burned with frost.  

I turn back north.  A quarter-mile and back to being an interloper.  The neighborhood’s seen me before on so many mornings.  I wonder if that makes me more familiar or more threatening.  Perhaps both.

I wish I had an Ipod.  I’d like not to hear their morning sounds, the cough of their snow blowers, the hiss of their coffee makers, the chime of their church bells.  I’d walk along, just smelling the wood smoke from their stone-and-copper-restored 1920’s fire places, letting the fog sift into my skin.  

And then, just as the sun made it’s first incursion into the fog, as everything explosively shines all silver-numinous and glorious, a song would start . . .

. . . and I’d barely feel the shaft when the arrow slips between my ribs, successfully thinning the herd.

—————————————

* Freezing Fog. For the technically minded, here’s the BBC’s explanation:

Freezing fog is composed of supercooled water droplets (i.e. ones which remain liquid even though the temperature is below freezing-point). One of the characteristics of freezing fog is that rime – composed of feathery ice crystals – is deposited on the windward side of vertical surfaces such as lamp-posts, fence-posts, overhead wires, pylons and transmitting masts.

McCain Instrumental in Removing Dineh-Navajo Tribe

How does history repeat itself? Let’s count some of the ways.

One.

Source

The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy. During the fall and winter of 1838 and 1839, the Cherokees were forcibly moved west by the United States government. Approximately 4,000 Cherokees died on this forced march, which became known as the “Trail of Tears.”

In 1974 the U.S. Government legally endorsed genocide when Congress passed Public Law 93-531, which enabled Peabody Coal Company to strip mine Black Mesa by ripping the traditional Navajo and Hopi peoples from the land.

Two.

“The Dawes Commission” by Kent Carter. p. 208.

The debate continued and shifted to the controversial subject of what to do with the valuable coal deposits in the Choctaw Nation that had been segregated from allotment. Senator Robert LaFollette of Wisconsin objected to the provision in the bill that authorized selling the deposits because he believed the railroads would gain control.

Source

The Dineh (otherwise known as Navajo) were stripped of all land title and forced to relocate. Their land was turned over to the coal companies without making any provisions to protect the burial or sacred sites that would be destroyed by the mines. People whose lives were based in their deep spiritual and life-giving relationship with the land were relocated into cities, often without compensation, forbidden to return to the land that their families had occupied for generations. People became homeless with significant increases in alcoholism, suicide, family break up, emotional abuse and death.

And on and on, ad infinitum.


The ACSA challenges Senator McCain on his legislative history of Human Rights Violations: “a Skeleton in his closet: UNFIT to hold public office!”

A public research website: http://www.cain2008.org has brought together diverse historical elements of factual proof that Senator John McCain’s was the key “point man” introducing, enacting and enforcing law that removed Dineh-Navajo Families from their reservation on the Black Mesa in Arizona. The McCain revised law relocated them to Church’s Hill, Nevada (a Nuclear Waste Superfund Site, called “the New Lands” in PL 93-531). The Dineh-Navajo, a deeply spiritual and peaceful people, engaged in only peaceful resistance to being moved off lands they’d owned since 1500 A.D. Nonetheless, the Public Press and UN depicted brutalization, rights deprivation and forcible relocation.

Perhaps everyone’s hopes and prayers for peace should be,“Please don’t let them find natural resources on our land.”

Crossposted at Progressive Historians

&


Native American Netroots

A dose of fun and humor (minimum daily requirement)

( – promoted by buhdydharma )

Cross posted from Sancho Press.

Trivia question of the day. (answer below the fold) — Who was the only 20th century tennis player to win the Grand Slam in both singles and doubles?  

Word of the day. (definition below the fold) — Syncline.

Quote of the day. — “America was not built on fear. America was built on courage, on imagination and an unbeatable determination to do the job at hand.”

Harry S. Truman

Common misconception. — At the moment of his death, Caesar said, “Et tu, Brute” — The greek historian, Plutarch had Caesar dying whitout speaking, although Suetinius had him saying “and thou, my son.” It may have been Shakespeare who created the famous phrase “Et tu, Brute” in his play, Julius Caesar, wtitten in about 1599.

Useless information. — Almost 30,000 tourists visited Antarctica in 2005, and that number is expected to increase to 80,000 by 2010. Antarctica has only one ATM.

Bad President/Bushisms. — To a divorced mother of three in Omaha, 2/4/05….. “You work three jobs? Uniquely American, isn’t it? I mean, that is fantastic that you’re doing that.”

Austrailian Margaret Smith Court. Doubles with fellow Aussie Ken Fletcher in 1963 and singles in 1970.

n 1) A fold in rocks which the rock layers dip inward from both sides toward the axis.

ENJOY MY FRIENDS AT DOCUDHARMA. DON QUIXOTE.

Pony Party: Cute, Cute, Cute

There is a weird strain of optimism going around with no known cure and no way to tell how long it will last.

So…. Here are some cute things….

Isn’t being cute the most awesomest thing???? Try and out cute me with your finds.

I might be late to this early morning pony party as I have to hit the doctor’s office to get labs drawn. Woo Hoo. Nothing to eat or drink after midnight on Friday. Not that I will think about it or anything.

Please don’t rec pony party. Hang out, chit chat, and then go read the excellent offerings on our recent and rec’d list.

Both Campaigns Ignore Racist Bushco Photos

Bushco efforts to suppress images of Bush appointee Julie L. Myers awarding a prize to a federal employee ‘dressed-up’ as an escaped Hispanic or AA felon failed. Wapo finally published the damning images. Click to see the snap.


In a Nov. 8 letter replying to questions by McCaskill, Myers said that she was “shocked and horrified” to learn that the employee was wearing makeup but that within minutes of leaving the party she instructed her chief of staff to direct ICE’s events photographer “to delete all photos of the employee.”

“Although I didn’t know that the employee had disguised his race, I believed I had made an error in judgment in recognizing an escaped prisoner,” Myers wrote.

Double-standards at work?

The Myers story was widely covered here, (ht highacidity) but the actual photos were never released. As long as the photos went unseen, Myers could claim she couldn’t tell that the federal employee was wearing make-up. Now the photos have been finally published you’d think folks would freak.

Root is. Myers lied her face off when the accusations were first leveled, but the notion that Myers could have been un-aware of the make-up covering her employees arms was blown apart with the release of the damning images.


After seeing the photographs, House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.) said it was “obvious to the naked eye” that the worker was wearing makeup. “Unfortunately, I took Ms. Myers at her word,” Thompson said.

“It was clear to me that the man was wearing a wig and had makeup on his face and arms,” Akaka said.

Wapo published the photos Feb 8th.

The story is front-paged at Root. Shuster is out, how come Myers is still working? I can’t find anything on the release of the snaps from either campaign, despite the fact that key Dems have seen the images.

Now the proof has been published you’d figure Dems would be calling for Myers’ head. What kind of double-standard bullshit is operating here?

Where’s the outrage?

If this were a photo of HRC standing next to the guy the Obama campaign would be screaming.

Docudharma Times Saturday February 9

This is an Open Thread: young people speakin there minds getting so much resistance far behind

Saturday’s Headlines:No Funds in Bush Budget For Troop-Benefits Plan: War strains U.S. military in tackling new crises: As Most of China Celebrates New Year, a Scramble Continues in Coal Country: Two children die as Iraqi poison plot recalls Saddam’s assassination method of choice: ‘A new phase in the arms race is unfolding’ says Putin: In Venezuela, Faith in Chávez Starts to Wane

6 Guantánamo Detainees Are Said to Face Trial Over 9/11

Military prosecutors are in the final phases of preparing the first sweeping case against suspected conspirators in the plot that led to the deaths of nearly 3,000 Americans on Sept. 11, 2001, and drew the United States into war, people who have been briefed on the case said.

The charges, to be filed in the military commission system at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, would involve as many as six detainees held at the detention camp, including Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the former senior aide to Osama bin Laden, who has said he was the principal planner of the plot.

The case could begin to fulfill a longtime goal of the Bush administration: establishing culpability for the terrorist attacks of 2001.

USA

No Funds in Bush Budget For Troop-Benefits Plan

He Made Proposal in January Speech

President Bush drew great applause during his State of the Union address last month when he called on Congress to allow U.S. troops to transfer their unused education benefits to family members. “Our military families serve our nation, they inspire our nation, and tonight our nation honors them,” he said.

A week later, however, when Bush submitted his $3.1 trillion federal budget to Congress, he included no funding for such an initiative, which government analysts calculate could cost $1 billion to $2 billion annually

War strains U.S. military in tackling new crises

Admiral: Risk to capabilities remains significant, 15-month tours too long

WASHINGTON – A classified Pentagon assessment concludes that long battlefield tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, along with persistent terrorist activity and other threats, have prevented the U.S. military from improving its ability to respond to any new crisis, The Associated Press has learned.

Despite security gains in Iraq, the military was not able to reduce the response risk level, which was raised from moderate to significant last year, according to the report.

Asia

As Most of China Celebrates New Year, a Scramble Continues in Coal Country

DATONG, China – At the mouth of the Tashan mine, one of the largest coal mines in China, men in hard hats waited to begin another shift a quarter mile underground. Lunch break was over. Their faces were smeared with black coal dust as a dingy white truck carried them down an underground road to the floor of the mine.

“We’re working pretty much all the time,” said a man with a small lamp hooked around his neck before he climbed onto the truck and disappeared into the dark tunnel.

In China, Thursday marked the Lunar New Year and ushered in the Year of the Rat. For Chinese families, especially those of migrant workers, the holiday offers an annual opportunity to reunite. Yet for miners here in coal country, Thursday was just another workday. Vacations have been canceled. China is too desperate for coal to allow them a day off.

US says Mullah Omar ‘in Pakistan’

Taleban leader Mullah Omar and al-Qaeda commanders, including Osama Bin Laden, are living in Pakistan, a senior US official has told reporters.

He said senior Taleban leaders were in hiding with Mullah Omar in Quetta, from where they co-ordinated the insurgency in Afghanistan.

He also reiterated Washington’s belief that Bin Laden was taking refuge in Pakistan’s western tribal areas.

Islamabad repeatedly denies that Mullah Omar or Bin Laden are in Pakistan.

Middle East

Two children die as Iraqi poison plot recalls Saddam’s assassination method of choice

· Cakes laced with thallium left at popular sports club

· Britain sends antidote to Basra base and hospitals


Michael Howard in Baghdad

Saturday February 9, 2008

The Guardian

Iraqi authorities are investigating a case of poisoning at a Baghdad sports club popular with the army in which two children have died and nine people have been taken to hospital. All were reported to have eaten cakes laced with thallium, the toxin that was often used by Saddam’s secret police to kill political opponents.

Security officials said it was the first known incident of deliberate thallium poisoning since the fall of the regime.

Police said they had traced the two cakes to a bakery in Baghdad’s Adhamiya district. This Sunni Arab stronghold was a bastion for supporters of the late dictator, and more recently a major locus of activity for Sunni extremists.

‘Tragic protest’ of Iraqi Kurdish women

Like their colleagues across Iraq, the doctors and nurses at the Emergency Management Centre in Irbil work relentlessly.

The medical specialisms at this hospital are war surgery and burns.

With the continuing violence in nearby Mosul and Diyala province, war surgery is in great demand. So too is the burns unit.

The chief nurse, Ahmed Mohammad, has done the tour of the women’s intensive care unit many times before.

“This is ICU burns,” he said. “We have four patients here.”

In the corner of the ward lies a girl swaddled in bandages.

“The upper part of her body is burnt. So are her head and her arms, as well as one of her thighs,” he said.

Eighteen-year-old Sana has been here for nine weeks. Only the tips of her fingers and a small part of her face are visible.

Europe

‘A new phase in the arms race is unfolding’ says Putin

Vladimir Putin has used one of the last major speeches of his presidency to deliver a defiant message to the West, accusing it of unleashing a new arms race that left Moscow no choice but to retaliate in kind. Less than a month before presidential elections that his hand-picked successor is almost certain to win, the speech removed any lingering doubts that Russian foreign policy might become less aggressive after Mr Putin steps down.

“It’s clear that a new arms race is unfolding in the world,” said Mr Putin, one that Russia did not start. And he vowed that Russia would respond to the threats by developing newer and more modern weapons that were as good as if not better than those possessed by Western countries. “We are being forced into retaliating … Russia has and always will have the answers to these challenges,” he said.

Soldier’s message in a bottle surfaces – 90 years later

By John Lichfield in Paris

Saturday, 9 February 2008

A message in a bottle, which has floated on the waves of time for 90 years, has been found by French archaeologists.

The beer bottle contained a letter sent to an American soldier fighting in the First World War from his “Aunt Pete” in Oklahoma City. It was discovered by accident by archaeologists exploring a 6th and 7th century Merovingian settlement, at Messein in Lorraine.

The letter gives a jaunty, unthinkingly racist account of life in the US Midwest in July 1918, four months before the end of the war. “Its [sic] all most [sic] impossible to get help of any kind and those you do get are likely to be called any time,” Aunt Pete writes. “There is a big bunch of darkeys going tomorrow night. They had a big parade today and are going to have a big dance tomorrow at the colored park: we lost our porter.”

Latin America

In Venezuela, Faith in Chávez Starts to Wane

CARACAS, Venezuela – These should be the best of times for Venezuela, blessed with the largest conventional oil reserves outside the Middle East and oil prices near record highs. But this country’s economic and social problems have become so acute lately that President Hugo Chávez is facing an unusual onslaught of criticism, even from his own supporters, about his management of the country.

In a rare turnabout, it is Mr. Chávez’s opponents who appear to have the political winds at their backs as they reverse policies of abstention and prepare dozens of candidates for pivotal regional elections. Mr. Chávez, for perhaps the first time since a recall vote in 2004, is increasingly on the defensive as his efforts to advance Venezuela toward socialism are seen as failing to address a growing list of worries like violent crime and shortages of basic foods.

Scholar: US sought help in Bolivia

LA PAZ, Bolivia – An American scholar said Friday that an official at the U.S. Embassy asked him to keep tabs on Venezuelan and Cuban workers in Bolivia. Washington said that any such request would be an error and against U.S. policy.

“I was shocked,” Fulbright scholar Alex van Schaick told The Associated Press. “I mean, this man’s asking me to spy for the U.S. government.” Van Schaick is one of six Fulbright scholars doing research in the country.

The U.S. Embassy in La Paz issued a statement Friday saying that “some routine information sessions about security given to certain American citizens included incorrect information. As soon as this was brought to our attention, appropriate measures were taken to assure that these errors would not be repeated.”

Africa

UN: Peacekeepers plan to leave Eritrea

UNITED NATIONS – In an unusual move, the United Nations is being forced to prepare an imminent pullout from Eritrea and plans to relocate all its peacekeeping troops there across the border in Ethiopia, senior U.N. officials and diplomats told The Associated Press on Friday.

Because of restrictions imposed by the Eritrean government, U.N. personnel are down to their last remaining emergency reserves of diesel fuel to power generators, vehicles and other equipment for the 7 1/2-year-old peacekeeping operation.

At last count, that operation had about 1,500 troops and 200 military observers, along with several hundred civilians and dozens of volunteers based out of Asmara, Eritrea and Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Mbeki: South Africa Challenged But ‘Still On Course’

South African President Thabo Mbeki on Friday outlined his plan of action for his final full year in office. He says his country is “still on course,” despite a decline in economic growth, widespread electricity blackouts and infighting inside his own ruling party. For VOA, Terry FitzPatrick reports from Cape Town.

Welcome New Users: Traffic Cops and Civility

dKos FlagWelcome, New Users, to The Daily Kos.  This Diary is intended to help you orient yourself to the site and ask questions about how to use it.

In the Body you will find some links intended to get you participating more effectively.  Also in the Body this week is a discussion of Traffic Cops and Civility.

After that you can ask me any question you want.  I don’t know all the answers so if you stump me, you do.  I invite those wiser than I to contribute and correct (or raise a ruckus, just don’t scare people).

No permission slips needed, join us at the deep end of the pool for adult swim.

Hello Devil.  Welcome to Hell.

If your user id (hover your mouse over your name in any comment, look at the status bar in the bottom of your browser) is larger than 149511 you probably haven’t had to opportunity to participate in one of my Welcome New Users diaries.

There are 13 of them that I consider the New Users Guide and I encourage you to take a look at the table of contents at least so you can see what kind of information is already available.

Traffic Cops and Civility

You know, sometimes I just get all cramped up from patting myself on the back.

I wish to make it clear that I’m just a relatively new (April 2005) regular user of the Daily Kos.  I don’t speak for the site, nor do I have any powers or abilities that any user including the rankest n00b can not aspire to acquire.

But there are places where my magnificent omnipotence reigns supreme and I have magic.

When I signed on as number 9 the requirement to play in budhy’s brand new Soapblox was that I had to contribute one piece of original work a week.  During the month or so it to the Admins and Contributing Editors to set up the site (deciding on things like color schemes for instance) our group developed some scheduling rules that today are summarized at the top of every daily schedule-

Please check here before publishing. Please leave a note that you ARE publishing. Please be ready to tend your essay for 90 minutes. Please give the previous author at least one hour at the top of the Front Page. If you have committed to a time please publish on time. If you are promoting an essay please note the time of promotion in the promotion comment. If content is lacking (especially morning/noonish) please consider the 9 am or noon Pony Party for promotion. Maximum Graphic Width 500. NOW WITH TIMED PROMOTION! Schedule times (here) Eastern (GMT -5 ). Timed Publication and Promotion times (there) Pacific (GMT -8 ).

And below that is a list of the available time slots-

6:00 AM Morning Muse (Robyn)

7:30 AM Docudharma Times (mishima)

8:00 AM

10:00 AM

12 Noon

2:00 PM

3:00 PM

4:00 PM 4 at 4 (Magnifico)

6:00 PM

8:00 PM

9:00 PM

10:00 PM

12 Midnight

3:00 AM

We have other regular assignments, but these are the core group.

Each Contributing Editor and Admin has access to a private forum where this list is posted and sign up for their Front Page time.  So far we’ve posted 173 daily entries (actual day count is a little off because we talk about other things too) and made 1538 comments, most of which are such fascinating gems as-

  • “noon”
  • “8 pm”
  • “Where the hell are you ek?!”

I have a lot of experience herding volunteers cats so I knew we’d need a system like this and insisted on it.

Needless to say I was gratified to read a diary this week that indicated dKos had adopted a simple scheme-

An announcement

by kos

Thu Feb 07, 2008 at 08:03:30 AM PST

This is the first time I’ve shared the site’s content duties with anyone, and while it was a little hard at first to let go, it’s been a huge help as I’ve wrapped up my book and dealt with other responsibilities. This is pretty cool not just for the site itself, but for me personally.

Pretty cool.

For further thoughts of mine on the general notion of scheduling and its actual practice ON A BLOG WHERE MY WORD IS LAW!!!! you might click through to my most recent essay on the subject- Meta: Scheduling IV.  That includes links to all my scheduling essays (I think) and as you track them back you will discover the evolution of my ideas on critical times among other things.

Civility

One dKos user who has given us the favor of his custom is Meteor Blades who posted a cautionary tale on the right hand side where Meta rules the day.

Civility, Like Peace, Begins Within You

by Meteor Blades

Fri Feb 08, 2008 at 12:46:50 AM PST

Sewage is another matter. Especially sewage spewed with an our-shit-don’t-stink behavioral ethic. I don’t know how big or small a percentage of the candidate Diaries (and comments) constitutes sewage, but it seems to be growing, and the stinkers no longer confine themselves to their own turf. I also don’t know and don’t care whether the supporters of Candidate X or Candidate Y are the worst offenders. Plenty of people in both camps – and in the camps of Candidate Z and others before now – have engaged in the spew.

In my opinion, I speak only for myself, not for any other administrator, fixing this is a matter of community moderation. Shutting off the shit spigot could happen, and quickly, if a dozen supporters of Candidate X decided to start hiding the comments and publicly critiquing the Diaries  of other supporters of Candidate X who spout sewage, abuse ratings, lie, distort and otherwise behave – as some have said – as if this were a junior high most-popular-student election instead of one of world-shaking consequences.

Also needed are a dozen supporters of Candidate Y to do the same to other supporters of Candidate Y whose behavior reeks.

Perhaps, after some confidence-building, the two dozen can work together, just as we’ll have to do after the Denver Convention.

More top-down moderation could, of course, be applied. We administrators could go absolutely wild deleting and banning. But once we got started, some of us might learn to like it so much that we wouldn’t know when to stop. Self-moderation – bottom-up, fairly done – is the progressive answer to treating sewage.

Knowing as I do that number six is the one of the kindest, gentlest, most supportive users on this site I can only conclude that things are way out of hand.

I know you’ll ignore me and Meteor and Hunter on Hiding (#1054)-

We’ve had unending confusion over what “trollrating” a comment means, in the past. Hopefully this simple change should help a bit. Here, I’ll copy and fix up the FAQ wording on trollratings — now “Hide” ratings:

To “Hide” something has exactly one meaning. When you vote to “Hide” something, as a trusted user, you are stating that the comment should be made invisible to all site users. You’re saying that the comment is so bad — so disruptive or damaging to the community — that it isn’t worth even a debate, but should be deleted from the discussion as being simply inflammatory, simply off-topic, or simply a lie.

That’s how it’s intended to be used. When in doubt, remember: individual bad comments should be “hidden” regardless of whether the commenter is a true “troll” or a perfectly respected user that made a bad comment. You’re voting to hide one particular comment, you’re not declaring the person who made it to be unworthy of all future discourse. And never — NEVER — vote to hide a comment just because the commenter disagrees with you, so long as that comment is civil.

My emphasis.

Well over at the Lesser Satan we’ve had many debates about civility and just recently we had a thread between two users calling each other assholes and fully living up to that estimation.

And they were relentlessly “Hidden” into oblivion (yes, that and the Wrong! rating said skippy who coined blogtopia).

Guess what-

The Ridiculousness and Danger of Troll Ratings

And that’s it-

You can blacken and tarnish their reputation, making it that much more difficult for them to achieve Trusted Usership.

You can hide things.

There is no autoban here.  Your case will be individually reviewed by budhy who has the final say.  I’ve no doubt he will accept input from his advisors but he’s the man.  I’ve argued for penalties short of banning and I think there’s some consensus on that, but we’ll see when the time arises.

Other than that, there is nothing much anyone on this board can do to you at all.  Other than say harsh words.

What are harsh words, and should you be afraid of them?

Not at all.

budhy says hiding should be very rare and it is.  A Hide should never be used for something that is just Wrong! and merely makes you question a poster’s motives or intellect.  Hiding is based on content, there are other penalties for ‘bad action’.

You should be a courageous blogger.

Think about what we most decry in Washington, it’s the establishment’s inability to withstand the baseless bloviating and canards of the Right Wing Noise Machine.

You’re tougher than that, aren’t you?

Now I’m all for hiding hate speech and fighting words but stupid ain’t one of them and Wrong! indicates- “Your comment makes me question your motives and/or intelligence.”

It’s ok to call someone Wrong!.  It’s ok to be called Wrong!.  Doesn’t hurt a bit, see?”

A Ridiculous Example

budhy explicitly allows 9-11 Conspiracy Theories.  Perhaps you wish to post an Essay.  I think MIHOP is ridiculous and LIHOP proven- “Bin Ladin Determined to Attack in U.S.”

From the community you can expect ridicule and derision at best (yes, I wrote that).  Wrong!s and Hides– piles of them.

Suck it up you Whiny Ass Titty Baby.  You’ll never get TU but you’ll never be banned.  budhy explicitly allows CT.

The community will think you’re kooky because you’re a kook.  Get over it.

You can’t be afraid of words.

“Your ideas are stupid and you’re a poopy head.”

Really? How so?

“You smell like farts. Hahhahahahahhahhahah!”

Pfui.  I’m done with you.

And stay done.

The whole concept of this site is for you not to be afraid to say what you think, but you can’t go around afraid that someone will disagree with you.  And that’s what it is.

If you have the courage of your convictions engage.  If you’re not impressed don’t, you control your own actions and reactions.

What ever you do don’t whine and complain about how mean and unfair it is when somebody says Wrong! “Your comment makes me question your motives and/or intelligence.”, either with words or with ratings.

I didn’t sign on to be a hall monitor in a kindergarden.”

###

I wish to add a few points for extra emphasis-

Point A-  You can’t hurt anyone with ratings.  They mean what they say.

Point B-  There are no bad opinions.  There are bad actors.

Point C-  “If you can’t handle someone saying you are full of shit, or you are clueless, or you don’t know what you’re talking about, or whatever, then really, this isn’t the sort of thing you should be doing.”- Markos Moulitsas.

So there you go.

What kind of content do I think should be Hidden?

  • Hate speech, fighting words, comments intended to incite and inflame, either the Community as a whole or an individual User.
  • Visual obscenity, dirty pictures, pornographic images, racist iconography.
  • Pointless disruption, filibustering, Diary hijacking.

I’ll add that here you can expect things to be downrated and hidden out of pure spite.  Wrong! means Wrong! and it’s an acceptable rating to give if you disagree with a comment beyond not a Pony.  No explanation is required, but it does not hurt you, it merely expresses disagreement.

Hide means exactly what it says.  If something stays hidden then it was deemed inappropriate by the community, 4 to 1.  So say we all.  Now the ones who advocate that most specifically and frequently run the risk of being labeled chronic malcontents by the board of this site, but good or bad we are all actors and willing to stand by our dramatic choices are we not?

Finally, Couragous bloggers don’t spend their days sitting around whining so and so was mean to me, he called me a poopy head.

Grow up and get over it you whiny ass titty baby.

All our rules at DocuDharma on civility can be summed up this way-

  • You can’t expect that people will not be rude and call you names AND you have to accept the judgement of the community if you do that, in terms of being hidden or wronged and that’s the way it is.

Our Community Moderation is working perfectly.  The things that should be hidden… are.

I’ll note for the record that there are users who’s indiscriminate use of downrates has brought them to the attention of the Board.

This despite the fact we do not consider the use of downrates to be unacceptable behavior because they have so little effect on anything except your inflated sense of self importance.

Smart posters ingore them.  If you do not, that in fact makes you less than smart.  Learn to live with your mental handicap.

If you think someone is a threat to the site, email an Admin.

A Soldier’s Final Wish Comes True

All soldiers wish for two things: Another day and the chance to come home.

Sgt. Peter Neesley had a third wish: He wanted to bring the stray dogs — Mama and Boris — he had befriended in Iraq home with him.

Sgt. Peter Neesley did not get either of his first two wishes.  On Christmas Day, from causes still unexplained, he died.

Today, though, thanks to Best Friends Animal Society, his last wish came true.  

Sgt. Peter Neesley, on his second tour of duty with the U.S. Army, began feeding a mama dog and her two puppies when he patrolled a Baghdad neighborhood. After one of the puppies was hit by a car and killed, Peter built them a red-and-white doghouse – equipped with blankets, a mattress and an Army insignia above the door. He lured the mama dog and her remaining puppy to the doghouse, which he placed just outside the military base wall.

Photobucket

(text and photo courtesy of Best Friends Animal Society, with permission)

When he was still alive, Sgt. Neesley contacted his family back home in Michigan by email, sending them photos of Mama (a black Lab mix) and Boris (her white-and-brown spotted puppy) and told them he wanted to bring them home with him when his deployment was over in late July.

“Our family has always had dogs or cats and other little critters,” says his sister, Carey Neesley. “Peter was always bringing strays home.”

But on Christmas Day, Peter, just 28, died in his sleep in his barracks (no cause of death has been released) before he could send the dogs home. His soldier friends continued to feed Mama and Boris and watch out for them.

Source ~ Best Friends Animal Society

It was my sad duty to write Sgt. Neesley’s IGTNT tribute.  It is here.

Because Sgt. Neesley’s family knew how much Mama and Boris meant to him, they worked with a network of people in Iraq and Michigan to bring them home. On February 6th, thanks to this network — which included Sen. Carl Levin — Mama and Boris left Iraq.  Yesterday, they came home.

Getting them to Michigan was not easy:

The family tried going through official channels and turned to U.S. Senator Carl Levin of Michigan. In the meantime, Kate Schnepel, who works for Best Friends’ Community Programs and Services, learned about the family’s efforts, and that’s when (Best Friends) stepped in to help.

First, (Best Friends) had to find out where the dogs were, then get someone on the ground to look after them, according to Rich Crook, Best Friends’ rapid response manager. After that, (Best Friends) arranged for security, contacted a veterinarian and found an airline. Four weeks later, approval was given and plans were set.

Rich went to Baghdad on a chartered flight and stayed just an hour and a half – long enough to personally pick up the dogs from Threat Management Group (TMG), a security company that rounded them up.

Source ~ Best Friends Animal Society

Photobucket

(photo of Rich Crook, Boris and Mama courtesy of Best Friends Animal Society, with permission; photo by Molly Wald)

Rich Crook’s trip to Baghdad was complicated and dangerous:

He spent 40 hours on airplanes this week and planned to spend more than 10 hours driving from Washington D.C. to deliver the dogs to Michigan.

“After hearing the story and talking to the family there was no question in my mind that we had to do everything we could to pull this off,” Crook said.

His group airlifted 300 animals from Beirut in 2006 after hostilities erupted between Israel and Lebanon. This operation was more difficult, Crook said.

“The challenge of locating and transporting two dogs out of a war zone was formidable, but everyone involved was determined to help fulfill Sgt. Neesley’s strong desire to bring the dogs home to his family,” said Tara Andringa, a spokeswoman for Levin.

Source ~ Detroit News

(You can read about the Beirut Airlift here.)

Once both dogs were in hand, TMG took Mama and Boris to a veterinarian with the Iraqi Society for Animal Welfare. The dogs were vaccinated and examined. After the vet gave them a clean bill of health, he sent them on their way with the proper international paperwork.

Then, with the help of Gryphon Airlines, a charter company that flies in and out of Iraq three times a week, Rich accompanied the dogs out of Iraq, landing with them at Dulles International Airport in Virginia. From there, Rich and the dogs headed by van to Gross Pointe Farms, Michigan, to meet (Sgt. Neesley’s) family.

(snip)

When the dogs left Iraq, the vet who had cared for them sent the family an e-mail. It reads, in part: “This is my job, this is my passion, this is my love. You cannot imagine what I’m feeling now about these dogs.”

The family was notified of the approval to fly the dogs out of Iraq as they were about to place Peter’s cremated remains. “We had a beautiful ceremony on Friday,” Carey says, “and we were walking from the ceremony to the wall where Peter’s ashes were to go when we got the call from Rich. It was an extraordinary moment.”

(snip)

What happened to Peter on Christmas day was unexpected, says his mom, Chris Neesley. “Peter always told me he’d be home.”

Even though she and her daughter are hospice social workers, adjusting to the loss has been difficult. “It’s different when it’s your own,” she says.

Now, with the help of Peter’s Iraqi canine companions, the family is coming to terms with losing him. “We’re absolutely thrilled,” Chris says. “Peter adored those dogs.”

Source ~ Best Friends Animal Society

Video from World News Tonight

Thank you, Best Friends Animal Society!

Please consider a donation to this GREAT organization: Best Friends Animal Society.

Donations to help other dogs come to the United States can also be made here:

No Buddy Left Behind.

Thank you, also, to Gryphon Airlines and Sen. Carl Levin.

Bless you, Sgt. Peter Neesley.  At least one wish you had came true.

Photobucket

(photo courtesy of Best Friends Animal Society with permission)

Load more