While many of the essays I have written over the years have a footing firmly based in emotions, I have explored the theory of transgender from time to time. Let’s face it: some people are not going to accept that transpeople are not just crazy loons unless they have some “solid evidence.”
Unfortunately, what people consider to be solid evidence has a wide variance.
In January of 2011 I shared a review of the literature. Since most of “the literature” comes from psychological research, that won’t be good enough for some people. Since I live with a graduate professor involved in educating and mentoring doctoral researchers, I’m sure we might disagree on that point.
This literature review is not up to her graduate school standards. I have not included an annotated bibliography in APA style. I’m only a layperson when it comes to psychology.
My actual purpose (and hope) is to get people to read it, especially the people who need the information presented this way. Well, that and making a few corrections so that it properly fits into my autobiography thingy.
I’ll get started on the other side.
The graphic above is called Faces.
I would be remiss if I didn’t include my most successful diary ever as one of the chapters in my autobiography. Presented here with some minor rewrites, this chapter comes from January of 2009.
From late January of 2008, I bring another of the conjunctive pieces I shall include in my book. It was originally published at Docudharma.
This was written in 2010. I’ve decided it belongs in the autobiography, alongside
All the other times I began writing my autobiography (which supplied some of the chapters I have already shared) in the end suffered the same fate: I couldn’t figure out how it was going to end. After all I wasn’t dead yet.
I am an activist for my people. As I have grown older, I have more likely performed my activism with my words, which is the tool I have had at hand.