The Manifesto Project: Submissions Please!

To be posted soon in Orange, also

We are all a bit disappointed these days. The Golden age of a Democratic Majority has not panned out, so to speak. The Dems have pretty much given up on doing something meaningful to oppose Bush. The primary is still five months of candidate diaries away …..and people are still dying.

We seem to have no power to do much of anything while we wait for the long year and a quarter until Bush is gone and one of the Dem candidates takes office and …hopefully….begins to fix the huge mess Bush has made of the world and our nation. So it is time for “Lessons Learned” and hopefully time to build a new way for us to be more powerful in the future. The simplest and most obvious way to do that is to become more united in purpose and in focus.

Armando suggests rallying around lobbying Congress, now and in the future.

Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse suggests a bloggers union

After publishing The Big Picture Vol. 1, several commenters suggested a manifesto. Thus was this project launched.

Though agreeing on what we agree on is just a first step, it could be a meaningful one.

From last nights Ask A Kossak…

One of our many Quixotic quests over at Docudharma is ….don’t laugh now!…trying to find ways to bring both the Progressive Blogosphere and progressives in general closer together. Finding ways to unite us, and by uniting us making us more powerful and more effective.

Herding cats from ponyback.

One of the ways we think might be effective is coming up with a very basic and simple (we hope!) list of things we agree on. A manifesto. The internet is full of the things we do not agree on….including whether we need a manifesto or not. But not much is regularly said about what we do agree on. And what we DO agree on is in essence…..who we are.

Agreeing what we agree on is the first tiny step in bringing us closer together, to claiming the power we have….and are not using. Defining the principles and issues that are most important to us can help us focus.

Every Monday for the next few weeks I will publish another diary both here and at Docudharma asking for submissions for YOU! for the manifesto. We will have two categories. Issues and Principles. If you are an organized type of person, go ahead and make a list of your top five or top ten in each category. If you are a more casual person, just throw in whatever ideas you have and we will try our best to collate and rank them.

Then we will start the winnowing process through more diaries asking y’all to vote on the lists we end up with.

Tonight’s questions are meant to get you thinking, PLEASE DO NOT FEEL LIKE IF YOU DO NOT PARTICIPATE TONIGHT YOU WILL MISS OUT. There will be plenty of chances to submit your …..submissions. This is just a primer to get you thinking. If something clicks, leave it here, if it clicks later, leave it in tomorrows diary….or next weeks. But please think about it and participate if you can. Simplify already took a shot at it, but you do NOT have to use his form or get as in depth, ALL responses are welcome. And let me remind you that The Declaration Of Independence is classified as a manifesto!

Many people were kind enough to respond with lists of their top issues and principles, but of course, the more folks who respond the better a sampling we get.

If you are so inclined, submit your priorities below….but remember, you will have more opportunities to do so and the more time you spend figuring out what is really important to you….what it means to YOU to be a progressive ….the better!

We all believe that Progressivism is the solution. Polls have shown that most people agree with the rather nebulous concept of Progressive values. By assembling a list of those values we can point to it and say, look….we want the same things as you. We can defeat the Republican idea that THEY are America, the Real Americans. We can show the voters that in truth, Progressive ideals are ALREADY their ideals too. That the only thing separating us are the wedges and disinformation that the Right Wing has been so successful at perpetrating.

We ARE the center! We ARE America! America just doesn’t know it. This is a way to help show them that simple truth.

Please help if you can.

Torture: Suffering for Beauty

I got a little out of the news loop when I was on vacation.  Now it’s 3 AM and I have jet lag, so I’m catching up.  The Blackwater stuff keeps piling up, and Media Matters did me the favor of a day-by-day review of what happened with the Rush Limbaugh fiasco.  I see where some MN vets are being denied the GI bill, and that it is apparently okay to deny medical coverage to small, vulnerable children.

Now Bush says “We don’t torture.”  I suppose that depends how one defines “torture.” 

George Carlin talks alot about “euphemisms.”  You know – where they simply replace words that make people uncomfortable, to shade the truth?  So “toilet paper” becomes “bathroom tissue”?  A “mattress” is a “sleep system?”  “Torture” is now “interrogation methods”.

So anyway, the President says we don’t torture, but maybe the shock has just worn off.  Otherwise, how do you explain this commercial?!

(Thanks toNyc Alberts, NYC, who originally saw this commercial on television late at night in a longer version, and finally tracked it down & also wrote about it)

By the way, The New York Times Sunday editorial was entitled |”On Torture and American Values” and contained this statement:

“Once upon a time, it was the United States that urged all nations to obey the letter and the spirit of
international treaties and protect human rights and liberties. The people in much of the world, if not their governments, respected the United States for its values. The Bush  administration has dishonored that history and squandered that respect.”

UPDATE: I posted this after it had been up all day at Democracy Cell Project and I wanted more discussion.  On Nyc’s suggestion, I sent it to the main women at Feministing, who he’d contacted after he first saw it.  I’m headed for Docudharma.  Any other ideas, let me know.  Don’t see comments on here but have gotten some email such as “It’s no better than if it were about child molesting” or “It’s an obvious example of corporate propaganda to soften the image of torture.”

Not to mention:
Ordinary commercials (which are usually in bad taste or have crappy music) are annoying enough….

Have we gotten so low in our degradation scale under the Bush administration that we can make light of torture, the worst thing we can do to our fellow human beings (and other animals on the planet) and casually accept pseudo-torture to sell beauty products…? (Beauty products?!?)

I find the commercial offensive in the extreme. Eeeeeeeeowwww doesn’t begin to describe the mental/emotional recoil I had when watching it.

Gotta go wash out my eyes and disinfect my ears… but how do I get the images and the sounds out of my brain…?

Creepy, in the extreme.

See also Nyc’s blogpost which paralleled mine, at A Pen Warmed In Hell.

Pony Party: Travel

Light Emitting Pickle here to bring you the most recent open thread. First, a few words about Pickle Pony Parties:

Please do not recommend a Pony Party when you see one.  There will be another along in a few hours.

As I’d mentioned in the earlier Pony Party, I’m oot and aboot this weekend. Anyone else traveling lately?

(One of these days, I’ll actually figure out how to include YouTube – the series of tubes is tricky – if only the internets were a big truck…)

Something else for US to ignore

Today, the Oxford Research Group, a think tank based in Britain that advocates peaceful conflict resolution, released a report that concluded —

The “War on Terror” failed and has only fueled al Qaeda and other militant Islamic movements.

Another day, another report for the U.S. traditional media and Congress to ignore. After all, Paul Rogers, the author of the report is just a professor of global peace studies at Bradford University in northern England.

Peace. Bleah. Who needs it?

Reuters was one of the first foreign media services to cover the report in ‘Report says war on terror is fueling al Qaeda‘. Rogers believes that if al Qaeda is to be stopped, then the West needs to actually understand the roots of their support and then work to systematically undermine it.

“Combined with conventional policing and security measures, al Qaeda can be contained and minimized but this will require a change in policy at every level.”

[Rogers] described the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq as a “disastrous mistake” which had helped establish a “most valued jihadist combat training zone” for al Qaeda supporters.

The report recommends immediate redeployment from Iraq and intensifying diplomacy in the region, including with Iran and Syria. Rogers said it will take “at least 10 years to make up for the mistakes made since 9/11.” More than 10 years!

“Going to war with Iran”, he said, “will make matters far worse, playing directly into the hands of extreme elements and adding greatly to the violence across the region. Whatever the problems with Iran, war should be avoided at all costs.”

I suspect no one will pay any attention to this study because the author is a professor of peace studies and thinks “war should be avoided at all costs”. Far too few members of Congress believe this and possibly no one in the traditional media will give anyone, let alone a member of Congress, air time or ink to say this.

But, the story IS be covered by the traditional media outside of the United States &#151 in addition to the British press the story has appeared in Northern Ireland, in Malyasia, in New Zealand, in France, and even in Iran, and many other countries are carrying the wire stories. And that’s just the English-language coverage.

But this isn’t the first time that a message of peace has been ignored. According to BBC News, the ORG report has this to say about our war in Afghanistan: “al-Qaeda had benefited from the removal of the Taleban regime in Afghanistan by coalition forces. The terror network got a propaganda boost from the extraordinary rendition and detention of terrorism suspects”.

Scholars who study peace predicted our “shock and awe” approach in Afghanistan would not bring about the desired end, but they were ignored in 2001 too. Shortly after the terrorist attack on September 11th, Salon.com ran an essay called ‘How to defeat bin Laden‘ by Michael T. Klare, a professor of Peace and World Security Studies at Hampshire College in Amherst, Massachusetts. In his essay, Klare argued that in order to capture bin Laden and defeat Islamic terrorism, the United States should abandon the war rhetoric (and by extension warfare) and treat bin Laden as a fugitive from the law.

There are many in Washington and around the country who believe that the United States should declare war on bin Laden… But we must also ask: Will it achieve the goal of eradicating bin Laden’s networks and eliminating the terrorist threat to the United States? There are good reasons to suspect that it will not.

Klare goes on to predict that if the U.S. starts bombing and invading Muslim nations, it will only make the problem of Islamic terrorism worse and convince “many ordinary Muslims that bin Laden is right: that the United States is intent on tormenting and subduing the Islamic world.” He then argues that not only will such a military response increase terrorism, but even worse it will fail to stop bin Laden.

As an alternative to military action of this sort, I propose a strategy that combines global law enforcement collaboration plus moral and religious combat. It would compel the Bush administration to drop its war rhetoric and instead treat its hunt for bin Laden as a criminal investigation.

It will not be possible to put bin Laden’s networks out of operation without the cooperation of police and intelligence personnel all over the globe — including the Islamic world. The best way to do this is to brand bin Laden and his associates as mass murderers who are sought for trial and punishment under U.S. law — as has been done with other suspected terrorists…

Furthermore, to prevent the recruitment of additional volunteers into bin Laden’s networks (or others of their type), we have to successfully portray him as an enemy of authentic Islam… We must encourage influential Muslim clerics to condemn bin Laden as an enemy of true Islamic belief. Only in this way can we silence him (and his kind) forever.

But I suspect just like they were ignored in 2001, professors of peace will be ignored again in 2007 too. Peace doesn’t win elections in the United States of America anymore.

Are there any bets on if and when we’ll see any mention of this report from the traditional media in America?

After over six years of this approach of total war, isn’t it time we tried something different? If it will take us at least 10 years to make up for the mistakes we’ve made so far, how long is it going to take if keep waiting to change our strategy?

Cross-posted at European Tribune and Daily Kos.

I’m Done

I just read a comment in Buhdy’s diary from my good friend CD.

I’m done…

I’m done with the meta.

I will post on it no more.

I will refrain from getting sucked in to the meta if at all humanly possible.

I will not post any more on the workings / goings on / antics of pff, MLW, or any other blog except maybe dKos.

I will only post on dKos if it has direct relevance to what we are doing here. But that relevance will (and better be) damned direct. And relevant.

When posting here, I will focus any blogging related topics on this site and this site alone.

If I do post on blogging related topics, they will be in the spirit of positive change and our potential to expand our influence. It will be in the spirit of building our community.

I will not post gossip about any other bloggers.

I will not play these games any longer.

I’m done.

From this moment on.

I make this pledge for the next 12 months at least. I make this pledge realizing this is the equivalent of 12 years in blogging time.

Anyone with me?

Guido’s Health Care

Massachusetts now requires health insurance.  If this is not unconstitutional it should be.  People without insurance of course don’t do their patriotic fair share in supporting the big pharma industry.  All this is going to mean though is a rapid downslide of an ever increasing list of not covered “procedures”.

It’s “open enrollment” time at work.  In the past representatives of the prospective health insurers would come to the workplace to explain their benefits.  This year it’s down to a read the intranet page and then click on the black hole of computing benefit selctions page.  We are down to Guido’s health care.
http://www.zwire.com…

This year I found the company benefit selection page most profane and offensive.  They tout your “opportunity” to set up an account, which you have no control over, in order to pay for medical expenses.
The second part goes on to extoll the virtues of preventive medicine and actually states “only 1/3 went to the doctors for annual checkups”.
Yes, I did save the pdf file.  Let me illustrate the point here clearly.  The company said only 1/3 of you went to the doctor for an annual checkup.
In general with every word in this health brochure I can envision the focus group of evil HR minions agonizing over each and every word trying to make a turd look like a silver spoon.

Oh, I see, that must mean this is total bullshit right?
http://www.hhs.gov/o…
Privacy of medical records?  I didn’t authorized the company to ask my doctor if I went last year.  The marriage of the most Satanic memes in business are now going to be coupled to and reinforced through government.
You will buy our crappy insurance, take our unproven drugs and if you go blind as a side effect tough shit.
http://www.commondre…

Now when I get fired for being a Deek, I’ll post the entire pdf and more here.
http://www.surfingth…

How’s your health “insurance”, watch as in time it’s going to wither away into corporate nothingness, kind of like dealing with the IRS or your cell phone “plan”.

Four at Four

This is an OPEN THREAD. Here are four stories in the news at 4 o’clock to get you started.

  1. Another day, another report on how the Bush administration is helping al Qaeda. Reuters reports Report says war on terror is fueling al Qaeda. “The ‘war on terror’ is failing and instead fueling an increase in support for extremist Islamist movements” according to a report by the Oxford Research Group (ORG).

    If the al Qaeda movement is to be countered, then the roots of its support must be understood and systematically undercut,” said Paul Rogers, the report’s author and professor of global peace studies at Bradford University in northern England.

    “Combined with conventional policing and security measures, al Qaeda can be contained and minimized but this will require a change in policy at every level.”

    He described the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq as a “disastrous mistake” which had helped establish a “most valued jihadist combat training zone” for al Qaeda supporters.

    The report recommends immediate redeployment from Iraq and intensifying diplomacy in the region, including with Iran and Syria. Rogers said it will take “at least 10 years to make up for the mistakes made since 9/11.

    “Going to war with Iran”, he said, “will make matters far worse, playing directly into the hands of extreme elements and adding greatly to the violence across the region. Whatever the problems with Iran, war should be avoided at all costs.”

    I suspect no one will pay any attention to this study because the author is a professor of peace studies and thinks “war should be avoided at all costs”. BBC News reports on the ORG study as well, covering the same ground, but adds the “report said al-Qaeda had benefited from the removal of the Taleban regime in Afghanistan by coalition forces. The terror network got a propaganda boost from the extraordinary rendition and detention of terrorism suspects, it said.” Any bets on if we’ll see any mention of this report from the traditional media in America?

  2. Some Iraqi leaders have given up trying to reconcile their difference. Joshua Partlow reports for the Washington Post that Top Iraqis pull back from key U.S. goal.

    Iraqi leaders argue that sectarian animosity is entrenched in the structure of their government. Instead of reconciliation, they now stress alternative and perhaps more attainable goals: streamlining the government bureaucracy, placing experienced technocrats in positions of authority and improving the dismal record of providing basic services…

    Legislation to manage the oil sector, the country’s most valuable natural resource, and to bring former Baath Party members back into the government have not made it through the divided parliament. The U.S. military’s latest hope for grass-roots reconciliation, the recruitment of Sunni tribesmen into the Iraqi police force, was denounced last week in stark terms by Iraq’s leading coalition of Shiite lawmakers.

    Oh, and no one could have predicted the following when the U.S. military began arming locals to “fight” “al Qaeda in Iraq”.

    Some potential progress toward reconciliation has run into recent trouble. The U.S. effort to recruit Sunni tribesmen to join the police force and fight the insurgent group al-Qaeda in Iraq was strongly opposed last week by Shiite officials, who asserted that the Sunni recruits were killing innocent people under the guise of fighting insurgents.

    “We demand that the American administration stop this adventure, which is rejected by all the sons of the people and its national political powers,” the leading Shiite political coalition said in a statement. “Their elements are criminals who cannot be trusted or relied upon.”

Four at Four continues below the fold with stories on:

  1. Today’s “Guns of Greed” starring Blackwater CEO Erik Prince as Bruce Wayne, er Batman.

  2. Ocean wave energy generation in the Pacific Northwest.

Plus a bonus story about Mad Max’s Wind Farm in Australia. So jump below the fold, the Bat-Signal is on.

  1. Today’s “Guns of Greed” — an overview of Blackwater and mercenaries in the news.

    • James Glanz and Alissa Rubin of The New York Times reports Iraq says Blackwater shootings are ‘murder’. “The Iraqi prime minister’s office said Sunday that the government’s investigation had determined that Blackwater USA private security guards who shot Iraqi civilians three weeks ago in a Baghdad square sprayed gunfire in nearly every direction, committed ‘deliberate murder’ and should be punished accordingly.”

      A statement by the prime minister’s spokesman indicate Iraq considers their investigation completed. Their conclusions contradict Blackwater’s version of the incident and state unequivocally the shootings were unprovoked. “This is a deliberate crime against civilians. It should be tried in court and the victims should be compensated,” Ali al-Dabbagh said. 17 people were killed and 27 wounded in the shooting.

    • In Iraqis tell of guards’ reckless behavior in the Los Angeles Times, Tina Susman reports that the “residents of Hillah await answers and justice in the slayings of two men. They believe those responsible for the deaths were Blackwater employees.”

      On August 13, Hussein Salih Mohammed Rabee, a retired business man was shot by a gunner in a convoy of fast moving SUVs. No one has been helpd accountable for his death. “His sons say the provincial police commander and a U.S. Army officer told them that Blackwater USA… was responsible. Hillah residents held a protest outside the office of an American nongovernmental agency known to use Blackwater guards, waving banners and demanding Blackwater be brought to justice.”

      “This company killed my father and left him on the street,” said one of Rabee’s sons, Bahaa Hussein Salih Rabee, the head of the physics department at Babil University in Hillah…

      Safa Rabee says the U.S. military offered him and his family financial compensation, but they do not want money. “I said, do you think $100 million can return my father? Do you think that can help?” he recalled telling the Army officer.

    • Anne Krueger of the San Diego Union-Tribune reports Blackwater foes begin fight with their feet. “Wearing a bright green ‘Stop Blackwater’ T-shirt, Rep. Bob Filner urged about 200 protesters yesterday to keep up their fight against Blackwater USA’s plans to build a military and law enforcement training center in the backcountry community of Potrero,” California. “Filner has proposed a bill in Congress that would allow mercenary training only on military bases… Blackwater’s plans for a training center have aroused intense controversy in Potrero and beyond.”

    • According to Stars and Stripes, Blackwater guard ballistic missile defense systems in the tiny town of Shariki, Japan. Where “100 or so government contractors and two U.S. Army soldiers” operate AN/TPY-2 radar that “points high-powered radio waves westward toward mainland Asia to hunt for enemy missiles headed east toward America or its allies.”

      “In all honesty, I have beat up the contractors a lot about making their people drive correctly,” [Capt. Will Hunter] says while driving on a narrow two-lane road through rice paddies…

      It’s hard to have absolute control, however, over a workforce that reports to a private company rather than a company commander, he says.

      The Americans work for Raytheon and Chenega Blackwater Solutions, who, respectively, run the missile radar and provide security at the base.

      Hat tip Wired News: Blackwater: Japan’s Missile Defense Force.

    • While covering a lot of ground already known, James Risen’s story for The New York Times on Erik Prince, Blackwater Chief at Nexus of Military and Business, does bring a few intersting quotes and I am still curious to how Prince was able to leave the Navy? “After college he made it into the Navy Seals following Officer Candidate School, and seemed eager to pursue a military career. But the death of his father, and the illness of Mr. Prince’s first wife, who later died of cancer, intervened, and he left the Navy.”

      Robert Young Pelton, an author and journalist who has interviewed Prince “extensively” said “I think that he thinks he is like Bruce Wayne in Batman.”

      “Bruce Wayne lives in a mansion and then at night he is out in the bat cave with the Batmobile. And that is Erik. I think he is conflicted.”

      … Mr. Pelton said it would be wrong to assume that Mr. Prince’s political connections account for his success. “It is a mistake to characterize him as his father, or by the right-wing groups his father supported,” Mr. Pelton said. “Politically, I think he is more of a libertarian. He hates government sloth, even as his company gets most of its business from the government.”

      If this is really true, then — Holy comic book meglomania, Batman!

  2. The Seattle Times reports that Tapping tidal energy is the wave of the future. Science reporter Sandi Doughton writes:

    The future of clean power in the Northwest may look like the 75-foot-tall yellow buoy now bobbing like a cork in the waves off the Oregon coast.

    Or maybe it will more closely resemble a gargantuan red snake, riding the swells and capturing their energy. It might even take the form of underwater sails rigged to tap the power of the tides.

    Each design is a horse in the race to wring kilowatts from the restless motion of the sea — and make money doing it. Several of the contenders will be tested in the waters off Washington and Oregon in the coming months and years, as inventors and entrepreneurs jockey for dominance in a field so new some compare it to aviation in the era of the Wright brothers.

    “It’s the Kitty Hawk days for tidal energy,” said Craig Collar, of the Snohomish County Public Utility District, which already has permits for trial runs in several Puget Sound straits famed for their rushing tides.

  3. Wendy Frew, the environmental reporter for the Sydney Morning Herald brings news of a Huge wind farm for Mad Max country. “A giant A giant $2 billion wind farm proposed for western NSW could double the number of turbines operating in Australia and provide as much electricity as a large coal-fired power plant. Epuron, a subsidiary of the German renewable energy group Conergy AG, will today announce plans to build as many as 500 turbines, generating enough electricity for 400,000 homes. They would be built on the ranges that rise around the Mundi Mundi plains, north-west of Broken Hill.” The site is nearby where Mad Max 2: The Road Warrior was filmed.

    4@4 artist interpretation of the Mad Max Wind Farm.

So, what else is happening?

Mice

This is not about anything in particular, it’s just a story.

Years ago, I got mice in my house. It was a cold, wet winter, and I live by a stream, and they discovered a place that was warm and dry. They invited themselves in. They sometimes left tiny packages for me to clean up. I sometimes spied them scurrying around, at night. One startled a woman I was getting to know. She was pretty cute. The mice were becoming annoying.

I’m not into killing things. I bought some Hav-a-Hart traps, and actually caught several of the mice. Whenever I did, I drove out to an open field, and set them free. It didn’t matter. They kept coming in. I think they may have had email or PM capabilities. Anyway, the word was out that my house was warm and dry and that I didn’t kill them. After a while, I started to think I should. But I didn’t.

Eventually, I made a thorough inspection of the outside of my home, and figured out how they were getting in. I plugged the holes. Problem solved. I didn’t kill any of them, and they stopped bothering me.

It was a cold, wet winter, and I don’t know what happened to the mice. I have neighbors. Maybe they invaded their homes. Judging from the number of mice, though, my house wasn’t essential to their survival. It was just easy.

I suppose I could feel badly for not having been more friendly and welcoming to the mice. I don’t.

Dispatches From The Abyss: Metabyss

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

h/t to Boise Lib, and yes, I know it is not a pic of the Abyss. If you have one, please fwd it!

Here we are!

Scrabbling to find our way in a blogosphere that is angry at everything and everybody and willing to take that anger out on anybody who looks at us crosseyed. A motley conglomerate of societal critics, is the blogsphere. Who as scribe points out, are more than willing to turn our sights on each other when we feel powerless in our societal criticisms.

Which, given the incredibly rapid passage of blogtime in relation to the incredibly stolid passage of Congressional time or societal-change time is….most of the time.

I am angry too. (If you want we can fight bout who is angriest!)

We all have to express ourselves in our own way, and we can all find something ELSE to be angry about in the way we are regulated in that expression. Regulated either by rules at blogs or by the rough and tumble and sometimes vicious criticism of blogs with no rules….where the meeker members of the blogosphere dare not tread. The atmosphere itself keeps people away as effectively as banning…perhaps more so.

We can never achieve Blogtopia….because none of us societal critics will ever agree on what a Blogtopia looks like. Having no rules eliminates one class of poster, the class that does not wish to be roughed up every time they post. Too many (any) rules eliminates another class of poster, those who cannot abide restriction.

Which approach is best?

All of them.

By having multiple choices of where to blog we can all find the place we each fit in the best. One personal preference is not superior to another.

MOST of the people we are talking about…. bloggers…. read all the different blogs anyway. If something is said on Dkos, people at pff know it because they read there. If something is said on pff most of the people on Docudharma know about it because they read there. If something is said on Docudharma, the hardcore bloggers who care about this stuff at Daily Kos will know about because they read here. By having the freedom to express ourselves at a blog that suits our comfort level….and by nearly everyone reading all the same blogs in our little corner of the blogoverse….EVERYONE gets heard.

There are of course two types of blog READERS, the casual and the hardcore. Casual readers don’t care much, don’t have solid allegiance to one blog or another and will blog where ever they are comfy.

Hardcore readers care deeply about the blogosphere and have definite opinions of why, how and what the blogsphere should be. These deeply felt convictions translate into anger and acting on that anger when something goes against their convictions.

All of us feeling angry and powerless at the slow moving change in the real world….and knowing they can have an effect in the blogworld, even if that effect is just to piss someone off, fuels a lot of the fires.

Just as we pressure the Dems rather than the Repubs because we feel we can have more effect, we also criticize each other because we feel we can have more effect there. Then one angry poster is effecting another angry poster and everyone gets angrier about people being angry. Or not being angry enough.

An eye for an eye makes a circular firing squad.

I know this is hypocrisy, I am as guilty as anyone, I just flamed GOTV and Miss Laura for instance. I am just as guilty as anyone. I don’t have any answers. I try to change and often fall short.

But as long as we continue to attack each other, we weaken all of us. It is the age old story of The Left. We all know it, yet we all seem powerless to change it. The Right knows it too, and fosters it, and takes advantage of it. Just look at the silly ass Move-on resolution.

During all this discussion it has been pointed out that all we can do is change ourselves. And just like changing politics and society, that takes time and hard work.

I wish I had a slam bang finish and a cure-all solution to end on…..but all I have is this.

I’m tryin’, Ringo.

And our only real hope is that we are all ….trying.

All I can say,is, when we look at the promise and potential that is contained in the internet and the many ways it can help with activism, organizing, educating and changing public opinion….it is obviously worth the effort.

I have always said we in the blogosphere are on the leading edge of change…and as pfiore8 said…. Maybe this is the first peace we need to achieve. If we can all find a way to work together, we can be a powerful force for change.

If.

Chief Gitmo Prosecutor Quits

Air Force Col. Morris Davis, the Chief Prosecutor for Guantanamo Bay military tribunals has resigned:

MIAMI — The chief prosecutor for the Guantanamo military commissions has resigned, raising the prospect of further delays in the Bush administration’s six-year effort to bring prisoners in the war on terrorism to trial.

The Pentagon confirmed Friday that Air Force Col. Morris Davis, a steadfast supporter of the controversial detention and judicial processes at the U.S. Naval Base in southern Cuba, had asked to be relieved of his duties. Defense Department spokeswoman Cynthia Smith said a successor has yet to be named.

Davis’ resignation reportedly stems from a dispute with Air Force Brig. Gen. Thomas Hartmann over Hartman’s authority to control Davis’ prosecutorial decisions.

Davis, a veteran military lawyer who had served in the position for at least two years, lately had chafed under the second-guessing and micromanaging of Air Force Brig. Gen. Thomas Hartmann, who this summer became legal advisor to the tribunal convening authority, an attorney general-like post.

Hartmann has urged the prosecution to move forward with trials of the “high-value” detainees rather than try smaller fish in the pool for whom prosecutors have more convincing evidence and better-prepared cases. The prosecution was prodded to proceed on those cases before all the commissions’ procedural codes were adopted and legal challenges had been worked out.

The 16 “high-value” suspects, including accused 9/11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, were transferred there from secret CIA prisons a year ago.

The only ‘conviction’ the Gitmo star chamber has managed to procure so far has been the embarrassing plea agreement last March with Australian Thomas Hicks.  Davis, who recommended a long sentence for Hicks, was reportedly unhappy about Hartman’s politically motivated intervention that forced Hick’s early release. (Hicks remains under a gag order about his treatment at Gitmo, an order conveniently timed to expire after the Aussie Federal elections.)

On the heels of the Hicks embarrassment, as well as continuing legal challenges to the Constitutionality of the whole sordid enterprise, the Bushies know they need a big win to salvage the viability of their extraterritorial star chamber. Yet the only defendant currently awaiting trial is 21 year old Canadian, Omar Khadr, accused of fragging a US Army medic in Afganistan in 2002 when he was 15.

While true believer Col. Davis may have thought he was doing God’s work in prosecuting this ‘small fry’ for alleged crimes committed as a teenager, Gen. Hartman understands the Rovian reality that the Gitmo tribunals are strictly exercises in political expediency, and that prosecuting a 9/11 patsy has far more propaganda value than prosecuting a lowly child grunt.  If Davis doesn’t get that, reasons Hartman, then Davis obviously isn’t the right man for the Chief Prosecutor’s job.

Bottom line: With Davis now out of the way, expect Khadr’s trial to be put on the back burner while the new prosecutor (yet to be named) gears up for a big, Gitmo show trial of the alleged 9/11 ‘mastermind’.  Assuming the Bushies remain true to form, expect this new ‘Terror Trial’ to begin somewhere around the time of the Democratic National Convention.

Tie the cost of everything to the cost of Iraq

Well, not everything – but at this point, it is about time that even the most timid of Democrats can use the out of control amount of money being dumped into Iraq as a sledgehammer for just how much of a trade off Americans have had to (or will have to) make with respect to Iraq

Since there is such a low percentage of people in this country who are actually making a sacrifice for this failed ploy at world domination, unless Americans see the stark numbers of where their tax dollars (and their children’s tax dollars) are going to, and all of the much needed and neglected services they are no longer getting, all of the opinion polls about the growing percentage of people who want funding for Iraq cut or want our troops out of Iraq won’t matter at all.

And this leads to an excellent framing opportunity that frankly, should have been used a long time ago.  The change here is that finally, FINALLY, an increasing number of Congressional Democrats are realizing just how much their constituents are very (passively) against continuing this disastrous Iraq policy, and how much those who are dictating this policy are (1) clueless and (2) ignoring other more pressing issues.


On last night’s 60 Minutes, the head of Interpol talked about the international law enforcement agency and the trouble it is having when it can’t monitor terrorist activities or respond to threats that it may be aware of:

Security isn’t the only reason that countries don’t cooperate with Interpol. Sometimes they’re just embarrassed. Last year, when 23 people escaped from a prison in Yemen, including the mastermind of the al Qaeda attack on the U.S.S. Cole, Interpol found out about it by monitoring Arab television.


“Worldwide in the last two years, we’ve had 43 countries where escapes have occurred. And zero of those countries — zero of those countries notified Interpol. That can’t happen. That shouldn’t happen. People wouldn’t believe it’s happening, but it’s happening,” Noble says.


Not only is Interpol underutilized, Noble says it is also hopelessly under-funded. The U.S. contributes $5.5 million to the organization’s $50 million budget, a pittance compared to big city police departments.


—snip—


“And we know that terrorist activities are being planned,” Noble says, wiping a tear. “And we know that if we don’t respond, people will die. And I know I’m a smart guy. I know I work hard and I know I can persuade people to do things. I know. But I can’t get the U.S. and other governments to understand that the problem’s a billion-dollar-a-year problem. You know, not a million-dollar-a-year problem. But I know that it’s gonna change. It’s gonna happen one day.”

OK, granted, many countries don’t respect Interpol, but if the US is so concerned with Homeland Security and “monitoring terrorists”, then why not provide some funding for the entity that has the world’s largest database of known terrorists?  By the way, the amount of funding provided by the US for Interpol is the same as it spends for 10 minutes in Iraq.


House Speaker Pelosi is starting to get it as well.  Yesterday, she equated the SCHIP funding that Mister Bush just vetoed as being equal to the cost of 40 days in Iraq.  Say what you will about her leadership or some of her actions or words, but this is a brilliant move on her part.  It shows just how out of control the spending is on Iraq (regardless of how poorly many Congressional Democrats are handling the funding issues), how little Bush and the republicans who side with him on SCHIP care about the problems facing millions of families here in the US, and also the sacrifices that these people are willing to make in pursuit of their priorities.


This is a winning formula.  Just take a look at the 2007 Budget proposed by Bush and take your pick of program cuts.  Environment.  Education.  Medicare.  $300 million cut to the EPA.  Over $3 billion cut for education.  Over $45 billion in cuts to various Medicare programs.  With a low ball estimate of $200 million per day, the education and EPA cuts amount to just over 2 weeks in Iraq, while the Medicare cuts would be equal to around 7 months in Iraq. 


Medicare gets sacrificed.  Tax cuts for the middle class get sacrificed.  Screening cargo at our ports gets sacrificed.  Education funding gets sacrificed.  SCHIP gets sacrificed.  But untold billions for Iraq never get sacrificed.


Most Americans aren’t even aware of these program cuts, let alone how they compare to the amounts being spent every day in Iraq.  By not only highlighting each and every thing that the republicans in Congress filibuster (or default filibuster),or that Mister Bush vetoes but also contrasting the cost of Iraq as compared to these programs, it will compound the defense into not only why it is so necessary to cut, vote against or veto so many of these vital programs, but also to defend why needlessly sending all of this same money to Iraq is more important.


And regardless of whether Bush or the Congressional republicans think, the vast majority of American people would rather have their money spent here than in Iraq.

Pony Party: Thanksgiving

Light Emitting Pickle here to bring you the most recent open thread. First, a few words about Pickle Pony Parties:

Please do not recommend a Pony Party when you see one.  There will be another along in a few hours.

Today is Canadian Thanksgiving (earlier harvest up here, eh? Sure beats celebrating Columbus Day).

This weekend is also my wedding anniversary, so I am currently returning from a nice weekend on the west coast of Vancouver Island – I’ve been oot and aboot!

Happy open thread!

Load more