Greenwald on Sunstein

I’m still holding out hope that Compound F will re-publish a clean copy of his excellent essay free from fear that it’s not something Sunstein said, because Compound F deserves that respect and a promotion to our Front Page.

But in the mean time Glenn Greenwald has also picked up on this story and I thought some of you might be interested in his take.

The creepy mindset behind Cass Sunstein’s creepy proposal

By Glenn Greenwald

Friday, Jan 15, 2010 08:16 EST

Sunstein himself — as part of his 2008 paper — explicitly advocates that the Government should pay what he calls “credible independent experts” to advocate on the Government’s behalf, a policy he says would be more effective because people don’t trust the Government itself and would only listen to people they believe are “independent.”  In so arguing, Sunstein cites the Armstrong Williams scandal not as something that is wrong in itself, but as a potential risk of this tactic (i.e., that it might leak out), and thus suggests that “government can supply these independent experts with information and perhaps prod them into action from behind the scenes,” but warns that “too close a connection will be self-defeating if it is exposed.”  In other words, Sunstein wants the Government to replicate the Armstrong Williams arrangement as a means of more credibly disseminating propaganda — i.e., pretending that someone is an “independent” expert when they’re actually being “prodded” and even paid “behind the scenes” by the Government — but he wants to be more careful about how the arrangement is described (don’t make the control explicit) so that embarrassment can be avoided if it ends up being exposed.  

In this 2008 paper, then, Sunstein advocated, in essence, exactly what the Obama administration has been doing all year with Gruber:  covertly paying people who can be falsely held up as “independent” analysts in order to more credibly promote the Government line.  Most Democrats agreed this was a deceitful and dangerous act when Bush did it, but with Obama and some of his supporters, undisclosed arrangements of this sort seem to be different.  Why?  Because, as Sunstein puts it:  we have “a well-motivated government” doing this so that “social welfare is improved.”  Thus, just like state secrets, indefinite detention, military commissions and covert, unauthorized wars, what was once deemed so pernicious during the Bush years — coordinated government/media propaganda — is instantaneously transformed into something Good.

Who is it who relentlessly spread “false conspiracy theories” of Saddam-engineered anthrax attacks and Iraq-created mushroom clouds and a Ba’athist/Al-Qaeda alliance — the most destructive conspiracy theories of the last generation?  And who is it who demonized as “conspiracy-mongers” people who warned that the U.S. Government was illegally spying on its citizens, systematically torturing people, attempting to establish permanent bases in the Middle East, or engineering massive bailout plans to transfer extreme wealth to the industries which own the Government?  The most chronic and dangerous purveyors of “conspiracy theory” games are the very people Sunstein thinks should be empowered to control our political debates through deceit and government resources:  namely, the Government itself and the Enlightened Elite like him.

It is this history of government deceit and wrongdoing that renders Sunstein’s desire to use covert propaganda to “undermine” anti-government speech so repugnant.  The reason conspiracy theories resonate so much is precisely because people have learned — rationally — to distrust government actions and statements.  Sunstein’s proposed covert propaganda scheme is a perfect illustration of why that is.  In other words, the reason people don’t trust the Government and why “conspiracy theories” are so pervasive is precisely because government is typically filled with people like Cass Sunstein, who think that systematic deceit and government-sponsored manipulation are justified by their own Goodness and Superior Wisdom.

They are lying to you now.

16 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. Word up dude.

  2. That’s the exact word I chose  describe it earlier. It’s the perfect word for this.

  3. isn’t happening in blogistan.  

  4. glad he got hold of it.

  5. And in fact most corporate and government organizations do.  It is an entire industry already censoring content based upon any selectable criteria

    Websense,SmurfPatrol and a host of others are already standard here yet we are disgusted when the Chinese censor their net.

    Insert your 666 Mark of the Beast implanted microchip to proceed.

    • ezdidit on January 17, 2010 at 03:49

    I suppose that Sunstein was driving winger elites crazy by establishing his bonafides with neoliberals a couple of years ago, but apparently all hell broke loose when Obama actually won.

    They like to talk about being above the law. Let that be a warning to them: two can play that lying game.

Comments have been disabled.