I personally believe western civilization, in general, suffers from a serious lack of “Science Literacy”. Even though it is Science that has allowed us to achieve so much as a Species, and as a Society — it is this same Science that far too many treat as “magic”, as “geeky”, as “Debatable”.
Funny that those who most question Science’s usefulness, seem to appoint themselves as “Experts”, capable of dismissing its “Findings”.
(Based on what Expertise? … one should always ask back.)
Well IF Science is indeed, Debatable — shouldn’t it be ACTUAL Scientists Doing the Debating???
(and not the well paid shills from industry and politics, who’s goals are typically to create “more heat than light”?)
Well there is a very interesting Interview conducted by Discover Magazine that attempts to do just that — Let the Pro and Con Climatologists critique each other … Let the Scientists Speak for themselves!
I have pulled some of the interesting sections of that “debate” for your elucidation …
(though I recommend reading the entire article if you are so inclined.)
and giving them a hug to measure their size. Parker’s own hugging has been extended with a robust group of volunteers conducting regular measurements of specified trees. (The boy scout to the right, while in a SERC forest, isn’t engaged in actual measurements for the study.) Some 250,000 hugs later, he has quite a database in hand.
Some say that in the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. But what do we know about our early universe and how we got here? How do we know that our ideas about the early universe are right? What is dark matter and dark energy and why do we think it exists in the first place?