| Muse in the Morning |
State of the Onion XII
Art Link![]() Shades
|
Nov 21 2008
| Muse in the Morning |
State of the Onion XII
Art Link![]() Shades
|
Nov 20 2008
| Muse in the Morning |
State of the Onion XI
Art Link![]() Knot
|
Nov 19 2008
| Muse in the Morning |
State of the Onion X
Art Link![]() Red Neon
|
Nov 18 2008
| Muse in the Morning |
State of the Onion IX
Art Link![]() Colors
|
Nov 17 2008
| Muse in the Morning |
State of the Onion VIII
Art Link![]() Working with Silver
|
Nov 14 2008
| Muse in the Morning |
State of the Onion VI
Art Link![]() Carving
|
Nov 13 2008
| Muse in the Morning |
State of the Onion VI
Art Link![]() Who?
|
Nov 12 2008
| Muse in the Morning |
State of the Onion V
Art Link![]() Sensory Input
|
Nov 11 2008
| Muse in the Morning |
State of the Onion IV
Art Link![]() Coming Out
|
Nov 10 2008
Nov 07 2008
| Muse in the Morning |
State of the Onion II
| Art Link Purple with Beading
|
Nov 07 2008
i heard this guy, Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche, say that in a video in Edger’s essay Been a Long Time Coming.
it was like someone hit a bell and the clarity and simplicity of its sound keeps reverberating in my head.
experience is unconditional. how simple: that which happens to us happens.
what, then, are the mechanisms that condition our experience?
i’ve been thinking about this in the context, of say poking fun at Sarah Palin (she doesn’t seem to realize Africa is a continent).
Is it dismissive or disdainful when I label 59 million people who voted (a second time) for bush as stupid?
i wonder how our reactions to those of others might condition experience and the ensuing interactions among us. what am i filtering out that makes it near impossible for me to understand teaching creationism as science? it isn’t so much that i mind another view point, but come on. it is religion. not science. or is it?