LA Times: Bush Gutted Iranian Intelligence Before 2005

Remember this moment from President Bush’s Dec. 4 2007 press conference?

[The President]: People said, well, why is it that you can’t get exact knowledge quicker? Well, the answer is, is because we’re dealing with a regime that is not very transparent and, frankly, we haven’t had a very good presence in Iran since 1979. And that’s why I instructed the intel community to beef up its intelligence on Iran, so we could have a better sense for what they’re thinking and what they’re doing. And this product is a result of intelligence reform and, more importantly, the good, hard work of our intelligence community.

Yeah.  Well.  Look at what we see in this morning’s LA times.  Turns out that when Bush came into office, he gutted Iranian intelligence operations, to boost intelligence on Iraq.  He partially, but only partially, revived intelligence work on Iran in 2005.  

In the Dec. 4 press conference, Bush was implicitly blaming previous Presidents for his own decision to gut intelligence on Iran.  Further, the 2005 NIE was based on relative bupkes, it appears.

In an LA Times story devoted to recent CIA efforts to get Iranian nuclear scientists to defect, we read this little piece of info a ways down the first page.

White House reversal

The administration’s decision to step up intelligence collection on Iran in 2005 was a reversal from a position the White House took after President Bush was first elected. Former CIA officials said that the agency had built up a large Iran Task Force, made up of nearly 100 officers and analysts at headquarters, by the end of the Clinton administration. But that office shrank to fewer than a dozen officers early in the Bush administration, when the White House ordered resources shifted to other targets.

Keep in mind, Bush did this gutting of Iranian intelligence before Iran shut down that covert nuke program in 2003.  That’s how impressed the White House was with Iran’s nuclear ambitions back when it had its sights set on Iraq.

“When Bush came in, they were totally disinterested in Iran,” said a former CIA official who held a senior position at the time. “It went from being a main focus to everything being switched to Iraq.”

— snip —

Even as the task force shrank, officials said, other CIA units, including its counter-proliferation division, continued to track Iran’s procurement networks and other targets.

Some of that reduced task force capacity has been restored, former CIA officials said. Two years ago, the agency created an Iran division within its overseas spying operations, applying to a single country resources and emphasis usually reserved for multinational regions.

Now, let’s return to that White House Press conference on Dec. 4th.  I’m requoting, with more stuff:

Q Mr. President, Iraq’s WMD turned out not to be there, and now Iran halted its nuclear program in 2003. Are you concerned that the United States is losing credibility in the world, and now may be seen as the boy who cries — who called wolf?

THE PRESIDENT: Actually, I am — I want to compliment the intelligence community for their good work. Right after the failure of intelligence in Iraq, we reformed the intel community so that there was a lot of serious considerations of NIEs in a way that would give us confidence.

No . . . at best, Mr. Bush, you partially restored intelligence activity on Iran that you yourself had previously gutted.  You were hoping to get intelligence that Iranian President Ahmadinejad had a suitcase nuke in his beard, or something.  You didn’t do this because of “the failure of intelligence in Iraq”, you were, or rather Cheney was, I assume, just greedy for another target.

And here’s a, I think, a very important product that is a result of the reforms we’ve put in place. As a matter of fact, the American people should have confidence that the reforms are working, and that this work on the intel community is important work.

The implicit “blame Clinton” here is just disgusting.

People said, well, why is it that you can’t get exact knowledge quicker? Well, the answer is, is because we’re dealing with a regime that is not very transparent and, frankly, we haven’t had a very good presence in Iran since 1979. And that’s why I instructed the intel community to beef up its intelligence on Iran, so we could have a better sense for what they’re thinking and what they’re doing. And this product is a result of intelligence reform and, more importantly, the good, hard work of our intelligence community.

Now, I don’t know what to make of this, entirely.  But it seems that we have to view the 2005 NIE in a new light, now.  Was it based on bupkes?

Was Bush so afraid of Iranian nukes from 2000 to 2005 that he gutted intelligence on Iran . . . until he wanted a new target?  

4 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. Daily Kos.

    • srkp23 on December 9, 2007 at 5:46 pm

    So another question then is why the hell do Dems repeat the line that Iran is a threat? Is Iran “a threat”? In what way?  

    • pfiore8 on December 9, 2007 at 8:45 pm

    dems do NOT vote for nominee, but write in votes for Gravel or Kucinich or Nader of Santa Claus. and let the republican win… so what??????????

    Pull away from status quo in a LOUD way. Be very visuable about looking for 2010 netroots candidates (like a Meteor Blades) to send to Congress.

    Really have a plan to target a few KEY companies and include, in this plan, to find sympathetic consumers from around the world. a mass targeting effort to hobble one or two industrial giants.

    hook up with a few representative communities in progressive states and come up with doable guidelines for people to reduce their dependence on oil AND consumables of all kinds. target TV reduction as one of the keys… and try to grow it out

    include in this plan sites, both conservative and progressive that, to us, seem fair even though different approaches.

    be clear about the need for differences of opinion for robust solutions to complicated problems that impact people across the spectrum in many different ways.

    in other words, we citizens need a plan. and we need to reach others and start moving like a big fucking wave.

    it IS up to us.  

Comments have been disabled.