Toxic Toys: Republican Policy

I did Google image searches for “Lead & Toys” and “Recalled & Toys”. More than 400,000 images were found. I didn’t search on “Date Rape Drug” and “toys”, but you know that would have some hits as well. The collage below contains a few of the images I found in my search that I selected for this short rant. Nothing I have to say in it is particularly new, but I feel better now that I have written it. I’m a parent of 3 children, and the thought that the toys I buy for my kids or my siblings’ children would somehow poison them scares the hell out of me. It makes me angry, too, to know that my government is complicit in endangering our children.

The Republican Party sells family values in its advertisements, but they promote corporate values as legislators.  A major thrust of republican efforts is to reduce the role of government in corporate affairs or, as Grover Norquist says “to drown government in the bathtub.”  

For Republicans, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the agency charged with protecting citizens “against unreasonable risks of injuries associated with consumer products”, is an impediment to free trade.  Consistent with this idea, Bush appointed Nancy Nord, a former Kodak executive, to head the agency. Nord has opposed legislation that would empower her agency, as virus head points out:

In two different letters, Nancy Nord has asked lawmakers not to approve legislation that would increase the agency’s authority, double its budget and increase its ever more pathetic staff. She opposes increasing the maximum penalties for safety violations. She opposes making it easier for the government to make public reports of faulty products. She opposed protecting industry whistle-blowers. And of course she opposes prosecuting executives of companies that willfully violate laws.

It’s not like her agency is overstaffed. You know that mythological character named Santa Claus who makes toys for everyone in the world? How old were you when you questioned the possibility that one man, even with helpers, could deliver toys to everyone in the world?  6 years old? 7 years old?  Well, do you believe that the one full-time toy tester in the Consumer Products Safety Commission can assess the safety of all of the toys sold in the US?  

The agency has suffered from a steady decline in its budget and staffing in recent years. Its staff numbers about 420, about half its size in the 1980s. It has only one full-time employee to test toys. And 15 inspectors are assigned to police all imports of consumer products under the agency’s supervision, a marketplace that last year was valued at $614 billion.

The Bush administration’s pro business policies increase the risk to children in multiple ways. According to McClatchy:

The Bush administration has hindered regulation on two fronts, consumer advocates say. It stalled efforts to press for greater inspections of imported children’s products, and it altered the focus of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), moving it from aggressive protection of consumers to a more manufacturer-friendly approach.

But the problem isn’t the poisons in the toys; it’s just a labeling problem.

But in a March 12 filing, China was the only one of 48 interested parties to tell the panel that it opposed new restrictions on lead paint in children’s jewelry. Guo LiSheng, the deputy director of a Chinese global trade agency, warned against “unnecessary obstacles to trade” and advocated international rules that allow some lead content. He added that good product labeling was sufficient.

See this cute snowman (courtesy of Soros on DailyKos)

He comes with a dire warning. Watch out pooty!

I was in touch with Nonnie999 from Hyterical Raisins and he said I could post this cool retro album cover that is  a takeoff of one by the group Jethro Tull (Ian Anderson):

Thanks Nonnie!

19 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. don’t breathe the air, drink the water, or eat the food. You’ll be just fine.  

  2. A perfect example of goverment by those who don’t believe in government with the interests of profit at the top of the list.

    The little kids in my family are getting only books this year. Fortunately they really like books.

    I wonder how many other products we buy for our homes are poisonous? It’s almost worth renting a handheld XRF to get an idea.

    • Bikemom on November 28, 2007 at 03:56

    such an important topic.  I bought a home lead test kit – I’m not sure whether it works and promise to write about it once I’ve had a chance to test it properly.

    One of shrub’s first actions as President was to attempt to eliminate the requirement that meat for school lunches be tested for e-coli.  So, are we surprised?  Not at all.  People are nothing to him and those like him.

    Was talking to my sister in law the other day about this topic and she said that she’s pretty sure every product out there would be proven dangerous if it were tested, so she can’t be bothered to keep up with all this bad news.  Surprisingly, alot of mothers that I’ve met have this attitude and equate education about dangerous products with criticism of their mothering skills.  I’m trying to communicate to these folks that this is a whole different ball game, and it falls under the area of protecting your child from danger, and that ignoring these issues is somewhat like ignoring a fire in your home because it’s just too much trouble to leave.

    Another question I’ve been asked is how to know which studies to believe – I answer that the ones conducted by independent researchers are more credible than those sponsored by industry.  It is actually pretty simple to google a primary author’s name to find their affiliation (often I google the innocuous sounding affiliated institute and find they are industry-backed).  

    One good resource on the latest environment – related public health issues is the Environmental Working Group (www.ewg.org)  

  3. And they don’t seem at all concerned about what to get their toddlers for Christmas!  They have the attitude:  “Everything is gonna kill you.”  Of course, these parents had the LUXURY of growing up in a time when the govt regulated/shut down lead in paint in living environments so you’d think the least they could do is CARE about exposing their own kids to lead.

    We have the most ignorant populace in the history of man!!!!  It’s willful ignorance.

    As for me…. I keep my food intake very simple (as much as I can) and the only cleaner used in my house is white vinegar. For everything.

    Oh wait…..dishes get Dawn dishwashing soap.  There is no better dish cleaner on earth.  And it works on oily seagulls too!

  4. North Stars fan.  The physical and psychological consequences have been brutal.

    Seriously, we need a progressive President and Congress in order to effectively restore the meaning of SAFETY to the Consumer Product Safety Commission.  

  5. for giivng me permission to add a link to the image of his aqualung-like album cover to my diary.

    • Tigana on November 29, 2007 at 18:33

    http://www.mindfully.org/Plast

    Drugs on toys are the least of our worries.  

Comments have been disabled.