Nov 26 2007

Lessons from the Australian Election

(@8 – promoted by buhdydharma )

My friend and colleague, American pollster Vic Fingerhut, was instrumental in Australian Labor Party candidate Kevin Rudd’s smashing victory over Liberal Party Prime Minister (and George Bush ally) John Howard on Saturday.  

Thanks to the Vic’s sage advice, which the Australian Council of Trade Unions used to develop hugely successful TV ads in support of Rudd and the ALP, Howard and his party were delivered a landslide defeat.

The lessons learned so well in Australia should be studied and implemented in this country by organized labor and the Democrats, as outlined in Vic’s memo below.

TO: Friends in the American and Canadian Labor Movements

FROM:        Vic Fingerhut

SUBJ: What’s Going On in the Current Australian Election…And What

               Lessons It Contains for the American and Canadian Labor Movements

———————————————————————————————————————

As many of you know, for the past three years I have been advising the folks who have devised the current ACTU (Australian Council of Trade Unions) media campaign.

What the ACTU has been able to accomplish strongly resembles what the American labor movement did when Gingrich proposed a massive cutback in Medicare, and the White House – operating under Dick Morris’s nutty “triangulation” theory – responded by indicating its intention to “split the difference” with the Gingrich-proposed cutbacks.

In the face of the White House’s threat to compromise with Gingrich, the American Labor movement mounted a strong media campaign which I was very, very pleased to design – leading to a rapid 20-point drop in Gingrich’s ratings.  Gingrich  personally blamed the labor media campaign for the defeat of his so-called “Contract with America.”

In Australia, the trigger was the introduction by the right-wing government of Liberal Prime Minister John Howard of a series of anti-labour laws (known as the IR – or industrial relations – laws).

Howard, a popular Prime Minister, is no pushover.  Howard, who was first elected in 1996 after routing a sitting ALP (Australian Labor Party) government, has since been re-elected three times – easily defeating his ALP opponents each time. Like FDR, he has now held control of Government for 12 years.

While some of the parliamentary opposition in the ALP stood up against the draconian, anti-working people IR laws the Howard Government introduced, no concerted party-based response was launched.

Just like the Gingrich situation.

And, so, again, just like the Gingrich situation, the labour movement in Australia took the bull by the horns.

A sustained national media and public relations campaign was launched by the Australian Council of Trade Unions.

The ACTU national TV campaign succeeded in taking the national debate out of the realm of macro-economics (Australia has a very low unemployment rate and the Liberals enjoy a 30-point margin on “managing Australia’s economy”) and into the hugely more favorable micro-economic “frame” for the ALP (and Democrats) of the workplace and “group benefits” — “who can you trust to make sure you and your loved ones (Australian working families) are treated fairly at the place where they work? etc.”

The result was a massive shift in public opinion against John Howard and his government.

The results, indeed, were extraordinary.

Support for Howard’s re-election went from +6 points to (-14) points – a negative swing against the Howard Liberal Government of 20 points!!

More importantly, the national labour-funded and designed TV campaign produced a firming up (and expansion) of ALP loyalty among the electorate – at a time when it looked like the Australian Labor Party might be moving toward permanent minority party status at the federal level.

Strategic Note for American Labor: It is exactly this same kind of critical long-term gain for the Democrats that could result from a similar campaign in the U.S. over the next 12 months.

In the past year, we have helped win unprecedented victories for the ALP in all the largest states of Australia, including New South Wales (Sydney), Victoria (Melbourne) and Queensland (Brisbane).

The situation right now?

            I would like to simply report that this is the end of the story and that the Australian Labor Party will walk to an easy victory in the election scheduled for the end of November.

Unfortunately, I cannot.

Among other things, the ALP federal leader, Kevin Rudd, despite his leadership of the Australian Labor Party, is acting more like a DLC member than the leader of a labor party.

Rudd – foolishly – has made it a point to separate himself from the labour movement from the very moment he assumed the leadership of the party earlier this year.

Remarkably, even while being attacked by a massive multi-million dollar media campaign sponsored and underwritten by business groups in Australia, Rudd has spent day after day appealing to business groups for their support, while, ironically, not only distancing himself from the highly-successful labour campaign which bequeathed him a 12-14 point lead at the outset of this year’s campaign, but regularly launching thinly-veiled attacks on them.

This tepid and confusing campaign by the Australian Labor Party has produced a sudden drop in Rudd’s lead to 6-8 points.

In response, the Australian Council of Trade Unions is planning a significant media campaign (legal in Australia) to try and revive the successful populist anti-big business and pro-working families themes of its highly successful TV effort that produced such a dramatic shift in public opinion toward the ALP, in the first place.

In this regard, I include a memo to the leadership of the Rudd campaign – written a few weeks ago at the request of the labour (and party) leadership in Australia’s two largest states.  It explains what the labour campaign did – and why backing away from the themes of the labour campaign would jeopardize the election outcome.  This, as I mentioned, has unfortunately since occurred.

The Rudd (ALP) campaign did respond to the memo by more frequently invoking the terminology of “working people” and “working families,” but has refused to implement the second half of the framing, which essentially asks:  “Which side are you on?”…and blasts the Howard Government and its big business allies for launching a concerted attack against “every working family in Australia.”

At the same time, Rudd continues to show his “independence” from the labor movement by repeatedly attacking certain union leaders and asserting he is going to keep “unions under control” in the next Labor government!!!

Talk about mixed messages to an electorate that had initially rallied by large numbers to the ALP based on labour’s strong defense of the rights of working people — to say nothing of the negative feedback union leaders throughout Australia are now reporting from their previously-energized membership.

Personal Note: You may or may not have the time to read the strategy memo to the ALP leadership, but it contains the same thematic realities that will face the American labor movement over the coming year…and in the years that follow…even if a Democrat wins in 2008.

The important fact to understand is that there are basic themes that work (or don’t work) for left-of-center and right-of-center parties that are common to both the US and Australia (and I might add Canada and the other English-speaking democracies).

If you or your union’s communications or political folks are interested, I am willing come over to your union to make a very brief presentation on how — and based on what kind of data — the successful Australian labour media campaign was constructed…and what lessons that contains for the American labor movement as we move into an election year.  Just e-mail me or call my office at 202-331-3700.

We used this info in stopping Gingrich – and it should become a regular part of labor’s thematic arsenal.

Best…

Vic

Nov 26 2007

Exoneration?

I read a headline this morning that claimed that LCpl Justin Sharratt has been exonerated in the Haditha massacre.  The definition of exonerated is freed from any question of guilt; “is absolved from all blame”; “was now clear of the charge of cowardice”; “his official honor is vindicated”.  

I also listened intently to a Pundit Review Radio show featuring Justin and his father.

His father is upset because the press hasn’t jumped all over Justin’s exoneration.  He says that he is going to release 1800 pages of evidence that was previously marked classified that is going to clear all of the Haditha Marines in our hearts and minds. He claims they were operating within their ordered Rules of Engagement. To my knowledge the ROE that the Marines were operating under that day have never been made clear to the American people.  He claims that the Iraqi witnesses lied and refused to come to America to testify because they would now be in jail for perjury.  He claims that Jack Murtha lost it over the Haditha incident to advance his political career and not because he was a past Marine just shown photos of children shot in the head by American Marines.

I wait patiently for this mind blowing 1800 pages of classified evidence to be revealed and if I owe any apologies for my anger and outrage I will be forthcoming with any and all.  I’m sad that I deleted the most graphic photos of three small children shot in the head from my photo files because after I had written a diary of outrage I came to a place where seeing them everytime I opened my photo file stopped being a healthy thing for me.  I can’t find them on the net anymore.  I think I swiped them out of the TIME Haditha article.  If you have any better ones than I have up here I would really appreciate the additions. We won’t see official photos for a very long time because they are considered a national security risk like everything else is by these fuckers in the White House.  Here is a link after the commercial to the CNN report from last year describing drastic differences between what those photos that were shown to CNN seem to indicate and the story that the Marines involved told.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

I think I know why the press hasn’t jumped all over Justin’s exoneration.  It’s because it isn’t that credible of an exoneration.  The press is often found lacking but I can tell from the way this father speaks that he has been doing everything to attempt to get the press to carry his son’s exoneration on the front page and there are reasons why they haven’t jumped all over this and it’s probably because for the most part the evidence is still a he said she said deal.  Justin was probably “exonerated” due to a lack of enough incriminating evidence and dead toddlers tell no tales.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Nov 26 2007

Euphemisms: In War & Peace

When I took my last long trip, I took along George Carlin’s “When Will Jesus Bring the Porkchops.”  I’ve been a fan for years, but was particularly struck by his treatment of the prevalance of euphemisms.  For a long time, I’ve noticed sanitized language used to talk about war (eg. “collateral damage” or “precision bombing”).  It’s not hard to find it when reading history (eg. “Indian removal” or “internment camps”).  I’ve been thinking about the propaganda and the framing of messages we’ve seen in the more recent past, and it all fit.

As George points out, euphemisms obscure meaing rather than enhance it; they shade the truth.  They may replace words that people are uncomfortable with or simply put a better face on things that sound too negative.  They may also dress up something that seems too ordinary.  “Thighs” become “drumsticks,” “crow’s feet” are “laugh lines,” and “pimples” are “blemishes.”

“Toilet paper” is “bathroom tissue,” and “sweatpants” are “active wear.”  “Second-hand clothing” is now “vintage apparel.”  “Toupees” have been referred to as “hair appliances” or even a “hair replacement system,” much as an “answering machine” is an “answering system” or a “mattress and box spring” is a “sleep system.”  Cars now have “braking systems” rather than just brakes, and the seat belts and air bags are an “impact-management system.”  We watch “animation” rather than lowly “cartoons” or “daytime dramas” rather than “soap operas.”  

Theaters have become “performance spaces,” and arenas are now “event centers.”  Hospitals are “medical centers,” libraries are “learning resource centers” and so on.  “Profits” are “earnings,” “criticism” is “feedback” and “special delivery” is now “priority mail.”  “Trailers” are “manufactured homes,” “mouthwash” is a “dental rinse,” “soap” is a “clarifying bar,” and “hair spray” is a “holding mist” or “sculpting gel.  “Cough drops” are “lozenges,” and “constipation and diahrea” are “occasional irregularity and lower gastric distress.”

Euphemisms have been used to “soften the language” when it comes to the condition in combat where a soldier’s nervous system has reached the breaking point.  In World War I, it was called “shell shock.”  In World War II, it became “battle fatigue,” definitely less harsh-sounding, though two syllables became four.  

By the Korean War, the condition became known as “operational exhaustion,” nice and sterile sounding, like something that might happen to your car.  Finally Vietnam, and “post-traumatic stress disorder.”  It still has eight syllables, but has been hyphenated.

Published also today at Democracy Cell Projectand Silenced Majority Project

Nov 26 2007

Pony Party: Procrastination

Happy Monday, all! Hopefully, everyone had an enjoyable long weekend. ‘Twas not a long weekend for the Pickle, though, since I live in Canada. Nevertheless, I had an enjoyable weekend. We actually had decent weather, so Mr. Pickle and I went for a few long walks.

Oh, and I forgot to assemble something for today’s Pony Parties. I am SUCH the procrastinator. And, I’m vying to have the worst Pony Parties evah! So, instead of commentary from me, let’s hear your Thanksgiving stories!

Please do not recommend a Pony Party when you see one.  There will be another along in a few hours.

Nov 26 2007

Greeks and Buddhists in Afghanistan: When Euripides was Performed in the Hindu Kush