What Really Were In The Tapes and Why The Destruction!

I was going to do a quick writeup about the destroyed CIA Interrogation Tapes, earlier this week, after listening once again to ex-CIA agent John Kiriakou being interviewed, on NPR’s All Things Considered {you can listen to the interview at the link} and his interviews sounding so much like they were memorized facts that really go no where.

Fact is I don’t buy his story.

The reasons he’s out in public giving this story are my suspicions, and not yet based on facts, may never be, but than again all it takes is total honesty, by someone, to get the real story.

The whole debate, to date, revolves around one form of Illegal Torture, Waterboarding.

Former CIA officer John Kiriakou was a member of the team that captured and questioned al-Qaida operative Abu Zubaydah in Pakistan in 2002. The interrogation is one of two CIA interrogations at the heart of the current controversy surrounding destroyed videotapes.

One of the reasons Kiriakou is traveling around giving his story, I believe, is to help keep it a one Torture subject. Another, I believe, after watching what this Administration will resort to, on numorous other subjects, is to place himself front and center as a topic taking heat off what the Administration knew, hoping it will die down as they concoct more crap for the headlines, and like everything else leave the concious thought of the populace.

Having gone through SERE – Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape at Camp Pendleton, out of the Coranado Calif Naval Base, back in 1970, prior to my tour in ‘Nam, and been one of those Waterboarded, as only one part of the Resistance, something one could expect if captured, because we were doing it In – Theater, as someone showed in an earlier DKOS Diary.



A U.S. soldier in Vietnam supervises the waterboarding of a captured North Vietnamese soldier. Bettmann/Corbis

I find his story rather incredible giving other information he puts forth.

Let me inject something here. The limpbaugh, o’really, fox crowd have been spouting off that because we do Waterboarding in our Training that makes it a non issue as to Torture. Wrong, that’s precisely why WaterBoarding is a part of the training, as an Expected Torture Technique, known to be illegal, and one that can be a controlled training technique. The control comes from the fact that at least one of those giving it can monitor your pulse and if any change can end the technique quickly by pulling off the rag covering your face and stop the other from pouring the water, something that probably doesn’t happen in the reality of Torturing suspected targets, the monitoring of ones pulse that is.

He keeps saying, in all the interviews I’ve heard, that this was an “Intelligence success story that Americans should be proud of.” This coming from an officer of the CIA and unless they stopped explaining what the Geneva Convention, International Law and U.S. Law are, as they supposedly did with our Military Troops, at least the Reserves and Guard, I want to know why we should be Proud of our Government, a Nation of Laws, condoning Torture, that which we Condemn others for doing! And by doing so leave our Military Troops, In-Theaters, subject to the Same as well as any Citizen of this country found anywhere on this planet!

Now he also says in all these interviews

“In 2002, I believed that desperate times called for desperate measures. And we were so convinced that al-Qaida was planning another massive attack that we really felt that we needed to do anything to get the information to disrupt it,” Kiriakou tells Robert Siegel.

And

Kiriakou says that the decision in Zubaydah’s case to use waterboarding – or controlled drowning – came after three to four weeks of questioning during which Zubaydah was uncooperative.

This above apparently to suggest that during the previous three to four weeks of questioning we were giving him cake and ice cream, cigarettes if he smoked, plenty of rest, frequent trips to  the local Starbucks by other agents for Zubaydah’s favorite coffee mixture…………….., and all that just wasn’t working.

So

Kiriakou describes the process of waterboarding, his own experience being waterboarded and how it took only 35 seconds once the technique was employed for Zubaydah to start talking.

Bam, strap him to a board, cover face with cloth, pour water, and this Hardened Terrorists Breaks in 35seconds and gives a bunch of Real Useful Intelligence where American lives were saved as a result of the information the CIA learned through this singular technique of interrogation.

Yet no one seems willing, already known how this terrific intelligence information was gathered, what Exactly it Was and What The Targets were, Nobody!!

It reminds me of Collin Powel at the UN, or Rummy saying the Administration knew exactly where the WMD’s were, in Iraq, yet when the Inspectors kept asking for the Known locations the Administration kept saying they couldn’t pass that on as it would give away their intelligence sources.

Now my first thoughts were that the tapes show One Hell of Alot More than just Waterboarding was taking place!

My second thought was that they would also show that Absolutely No Relative Intelligence was gathered, no matter How Much We Tortured, these Suspects weren’t giving up a Damn Thing, couple that with the Illegality of Torture would make this Extremely Damning for any and all involved!!

I’m glad I waited to hit this subject as others seemed to be seeing exactly the same thing.

Olbermann said a few things on last nights show, 12-14-07, about previous statements of Kiriakou that point in the direction of non useful intelligence, can’t remember eactly what Keith said and can’t find that video at his site nor transcript.

But we have this, below, from



Naomi Wolf

Found at The Huffington Post and now on the Alternet Site as well.

On the missing tapes, we would likely see “confessions” of prisoners who would say anything at all in order to end the violence.

Giving us the following

According to the little-noticed but extraordinarily important book  Administration of Torture: A Documentary Record from Washington to Abu Ghraib and Beyond (Jameel Jaffer and Amrit Singh, Columbia University Press, New York 2007), which presents dozens of original formerly secret documents – FBI emails and memos, letters and interrogator “wish lists,” raw proof of the systemic illegal torture of detainees in various US-held prisons — the typical “harsh interrogation” of a suspect in US custody reads like an account of abuses in archives at Yad Vashem.

And continues with this

“Through the FOIA lawsuit,” write the authors, “we learned of the existence of multiple records relating to prisoner abuse that still have not been released by the administration; credible media reports identify others. As this book goes to print, the Bush administration is still withholding, among many other records, a September 2001 presidential directive authorizing the CIA to set up secret detention centers overseas; an August 2002 Justice Department memorandum advising the CIA about the lawfulness of waterboarding [Italics mine; nota bene, Mr. Mukasey] and other aggressive interrogation methods; documents describing interrogation methods used by special operations forces in Iraq and Afghanistan; investigative files concerning the deaths of prisoners in U.S. custody; and numerous photographs depicting the abuse of prisoners at detention facilities other than Abu Ghraib.’

Leading to this, and much more

On the missing tapes, we would likely see responses from the prisoners that would be obvious to us as confessions to anything at all in order to end the violence. In other words, if we could witness the drama of manufacturing by torture the many violently coerced “confessions” upon which the whole house of cards of this White House and its hyped “war on terror” rests, it would likely cause us to reopen every investigation, including the most serious ones (remember, even the 9/11 committee did not receive copies of the tapes); shut down the corrupt, Stalinesque Military Commissions System; turn over prisoners, the guilty and the innocent, into a working, accountable justice system operating in accordance with American values; and direct our legal scrutiny to the torturers themselves — right up to the office of the Vice President and the President if that is where the investigations would lead.

Naomi closes with the following, and I’ll put in Bold

An independent special prosecutor must be appointed. The people who are found guilty, in America, must face justice.

Let the investigations begin.

Yes, Let The Investigations Begin, RIGHT F**KING NOW!!

My Name Has Been Soiled Enough, as have All Our Names All This Has Been Done Under!!

HOW THE IRAQ MORATORIUM CAN BOOST THE PEACE MOVEMENT

Xposted at PDA Blog

I first heard of the IRAQ MORATORIUM at the 20 year anniversary of  Nuremberg Actions.   September 1, 1987 was the day a  US navy munitions train ran over Brian Willson when he and Nuremberg Actions were protesting US actions in Central America.  The commemoration lasted a couple of hours at the Concord Naval Weapons Station “tracks.”   Then we gathered in a Berkeley backyard for a great barbeque, many reminiscences, and lots of laughter.  

With so many old time activists in attendance, it wasn’t long before the conversation turned to strategizing about what could be done to get us out of our current situation–the madness, the craziness, the intransigence of war on Iraq and threats against Iran.   Some of the folks present were already involved with the Iraq Moratorium, and the conversation really settled on that.  Dan Ellsberg was one of the main participants.  Despite his busy schedule, Dan stayed all day, from 10 AM to 8:30 PM.  He seemed so eager to find a way, a new possibility.  He related the story of the Vietnam Moratorium in the late 60s.

In October 1969 Nixon was so discouraged, angry and disheartened with the course of the war in South East Asia, he decided to threaten bombing North Vietnam with Nuclear Weapons.  Whether this threat was real or a bluff is still up for debate; it was most probably both.  According to Ellsberg, Nixon made it clear to North Vietnam and the world, both through direct statements and through the Russian Ambassador, that “…the train had left the station and was heading down the tracks…,” a phrase meant to convey the irreversibility of his plans.  

However, at the very same time, yet separately from Nixon’s plans, the peace movement came up with the “Vietnam Moratorium.”  A movement where people pledged to be in non compliance with the system 1 day a month, to walk out from school, from work, from business as usual in the name of peace and in protest of the war.  According to Dan Ellsberg, when Nixon saw 2 million people engage in this action, and state their intention to do the same the following month, he really felt he could not risk this large display of non cooperation with the system.  Ellsberg indicated that it was the Vietnam Moratorium which deterred Nixon from going forward with his plans to “nuke” North Vietnam.  

There are many reasons the Iraq Moratorium movement can be so potent:

    1) The actions are incredibly simple, ranging from wearing a black arm band to

         not shopping (especially for gas) to standing in a vigil to civil

         disobedience.  

    2) The actions are spread out across the nation and therefore close to our homes.

    3) The main thing is to sign the pledge to do something to make a statement for

         peace on the 3rd Friday of every month.  By signing the pledge, the numbers are

         counted.

    4) These gentle steps can lead to the most potent action of all, a General Strike.  

         Please read a short essay on this:

                 Garret Keizer, “Specific Suggestion: General Strike,” HARPERS

                                           MAGAZINE, October 2007, “Notebook”

    5) The Iraq Moratorium is designed to find the 65% to 75%  who oppose the war

         but who don’t know how to speak out.  This is a way to find them and to give

         them a means to speak out and be counted.  The Iraq Moratorium is an umbrella,

         not a group.  All groups can fit under the umbrella.

    6) The Iraq Moratorium breaks the competitive tendency amongst different groups.

         It isn’t one group against another.  It isn’t come to “our” demo instead of

         “that” demo.  The Iraq Moratorium is an umbrella, not a group.  All groups

         can fit in under the umbrella.

For this to happen, imo, all the activist groups must come together and YELL about the Iraq Moratorium.  All the Peace and Justice groups need to spread the word of the Iraq Moratorium far and wide.  Sign the Pledge!  Do something the 3rd Friday of every month!  And the essence of what you do is non-cooperation, a refusal to cooperate, with the system, with the status quo.  

The fine video documentary, “A Force More Powerful,” tells the stories of 6 successful nonviolent resistance actions from Gandhi to Apartheid South Africa, to the Civil Rights movement and more.   The refusal to cooperate, the refusal to go along is the key.  But it takes massive numbers to be this powerful against the recalcitrant sturm and dreng of the repressive immobilists.

And the question is:  How do we get these massive numbers?  We need to take the simple message “wear a black arm band” to every nook and cranny of mainstream America.  And for those who are strong of heart already, and are able to take the day off from work, then do it, General Strike!  

When I have contemplated the sagging turn out numbers at our recent demonstrations, it would be easy to despair.  After all, the ‘big’ National rally of October 27th, which had been planned for almost a year, saw only between 80 and 150 thousand people turn out.

The population of the US is 300 million.  The percentage of 80 or 150 thousand to 300 million is…

           

…5/100 of 1%!…

NO, no, no, boys and girls.  This won’t do.  Rather than become discouraged, I’m going to keep YELLING LOUDER to get people to stand up, speak up in some form or other, and TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK.

I agree with Dan Ellsberg, that the Iraq Moratorium presents perhaps the best opportunity for doing that.  

This is a plea to the Peace & Justice community to YELL with me.  

 STAND UP AND YELL WITH ME…IRAQ MORATORIUM…GENERAL STRIKE!

   

Contacting the Past

Last night I posted a diary about an email I received from a former student.  It contained the following words:

I hope that you can find it in your heart to forgive me for my silence as you struggled to simply live your life. I am a father now, and I would never want my children to have to suffer cruelty that I know you had to deal with when you were in Conway.

The diary (A Letter and a Response) includes my response to this and the rest of the letter.

I would have been remiss to not look at the incident from a slightly more detached viewpoint as well.  Here was a student contacting a professor after a decade or more to try to correct an injustice he had perceived himself committing towards that teacher.  How often does that happen?

Crossposted from Teacher’s Lounge

In fact, how often do people contact their former teachers?  I remember my high school physics teacher telling us when we graduated that he never wanted to see us again, because the only ex-students he ever saw were losers.  Is that true?  If it is, why?

After I came out, I contacted many of my former college math teachers because I thought I would like them to know who I was as well as who I had been.  But I mostly did that in person.  I’m not sure what I would have said in a letter.  Maybe I should try to find that, to do some more deep digging and tell my professors how they have participated in the construction of this person here before you.  

I did write such a letter…the inklings perhaps of what it should have been…to my Ph. D. adviser/mentor/friend when I asked him to write letters of recommendation for me after I had my surgery.  But I fear that, again, this was more about me than about what my teacher meant to me.

My own life has been one of constantly moving on, often severing ties with my previous incarnation in order to establish new ties.  I understand that most people’s lives have not been like that.  So perhaps the wall I perceive between people and their former teachers is breached more than I perceive.

I’d like to believe that.

Saturday Strategy: Reaching the Dems

We have all realized at this point that the Congressional Democrats aren’t listening to us. In fact we have all realized that the only voice they are listening to is that of their inner Barney Fife.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

So on the one hand, it is up to us…We The People….to come together and lead the politicians and do all we can to Save The Constitution, End The War, and demand Full Investigations into all of Bushcos crimes. It will take People Power  to do that, but the mass of public support we are working to generate must still be funneled through some avenue to effect real change.

Our most effective (but not only) road to doing that still lies through utilizing the only part of our government that we have a shot of affecting: The Democrats. The question is, how do we get them to pay attention?

While we are building and empowering various people powered vehicles and means and networks of opposition and resistance to the current paradigm and the parody of democracy that is our current reality, we also have to try to utilize this one avenue into the workings of the government we have. No matter how fruitless or frustrating it may be, we do know we have some effect.

We know that they read the blogs.

Jane Harman’s responses to Daily Kos proves that at least some of the Dems have their aides reading the major blogs and reporting to them on what we say….so what should we say? And how should we say it?

Obviously criticism reaches them. Should we criticize more? More loudly? More cohesively and, um, coordinatedly? Harsher? Or more reasonable?

Will praise work? Or will that just make them take us even more for granted?

Do e-mail and fax campaigns work? Should we concentrate on key Reps and Senators, or go direct to Nancy and Harry? How bout phone calls?

What other avenues can we pursue? How about the media? Would flooding a news outlet like CNN or MSNBC with e-mails asking for coverage of a certain issue…or criticizing coverage, be effective?

How about a Bloggers Union, as Patriot Daily suggested?

hat else can we do to reach out and organize the blogosphere? We know it has SOME effect, how can we increase that effect?

In perhaps related news..notlightnessofbeing has been using clever methods to get DD noticed, and the first fruits of his labor (besides a steadily growing membership) have appeared!

http://today.reuters.com/News/…

Zwoof’s essay was picked up by Reuters! So again…we are having an impact, both here and on DKos…how do we maximize that impact?

flush right left

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket hellojfdlkjfdskljfsdjklfdsjkl;fdsjlkfdsklj;fds ljkfdsljk;fdsjkl;fdslkj;fdslk;jfdsjl;kfdsl;jkfsdlk;jfdslkjfdsjklfdsljk;fdsjlk;fdslk;jfdslk;jfdslkj;fdsl;jkfdslkj;fdslkjfdslkjfdslk;jfdsjkl;fdslk;jfdsjlk;fdslk;jfdslkjfdsjklfdslkj;fdsljkfdslkjfdsljkfdslkjfdsljkfds
 

IMG]

More about RUSSIA. #4 in series. Many photos.