Can’t defund the war? Then defund the Democrats

(@3 – promoted by buhdydharma )

(Cross-posted on DailyKos, where it has really stirred up the Kossacks.)

Enough is enough.

I spent 20 years of my life working to elect Democratic candidates.  Because that’s how I made my living, and because I believed it would make a difference, I’ve also given regularly to Democratic candidates over the years.

But the list of Dems who might get a check from me just got a lot shorter, after their latest cave-in on Iraq.

If they won’t defund the war, maybe it’s time to defund the Democrats.

There are 70 billion reasons to quit giving — one for every dollar they just appropriated for the Iraq war and occupation.  

Writing it that way makes it seem like too little.  This is better:  $70,000.000,000.00.  That’s how I’d use it in a campaign commercial against one of them in a Democratic primary.

No matter how you write it, it is a lot of money.

Did I mention that it’s with no strings attached?  No requirements to even begin to plan for troop withdrawal.  Nada.  Nothing.  Zip.  Zilch.

Seventy billion.

 

How did that happen, when we elected a Democratic Congress just a year ago with a mandate to end the war and bring the troops home?

It happened because the Dems are spineless.

In the Senate, three Democrats — three — voted against the appropriations bill.  Their names are Feingold, McCaskill, and Bayh.  On an earlier vote on a Feingold amendment to withdraw most US troops within nine months, Feingold got 23 other Democrats to join him. But 20 of them later caved and voted for final passage of the bill, which passed 76-17. (The pertinent roll calls are #437 and #441.)

In the House, where the bill passed 272-142, 141 Democrats voted no.  Seventy-eight others voted yes. Here’s the roll call.

Presidential candidates were too busy running for president to be bothered with a little item like this, so they weren’t recorded.

Here’s what one of the House Dems who voted no had to say:

“This is a blank check,” said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.). “The new money in this bill represents one cave-in too many. It is an endorsement of George Bush’s policy of endless war.”

So maybe it’s not fair to tar all of the Democrats with the same brush, since McGovern and some others did the right thing. I’m willing to make some exceptions, but not too many.

It’s hard to know, of those 141 House Dems who voted no, whether they would have done the same if their votes had been needed for passage.  This was a free vote; they knew the bill was going to pass anyway, so they could get on the right side.  For now, they probably get the benefit of the doubt.

But what about those 78 who voted yes even when they had a free pass to do the right thing?  How does anyone defend them?  Is it courageous to vote to continue the war as is, when two-thirds of the people in the country want it to end?

They’ll offer plenty of tortured logic and parliamentary gobbledygook to explain why they had to vote for the pork-filled package.  But it’s all phony baloney.

It’s even more pathetic in the Senate, where all but three Dems voted for passage while the bill was passing by a 59-vote margin.  Another freebie.  A chance to do the right thing, to do what their constituents want, and put some pressure on to start bringing our troops home.

It recalls the principled stand of the late Sen. Gaylord Nelson, the Wisconsin Democrat, who cast one of only three votes against a $700-million appropriation for the Vietnam war in 1965.

“Obviously, you need my vote less than I need my conscience,” Nelson told the Senate.

Appropriately, Russ Feingold holds Nelson’s Senate seat.

So, given their latest performance, or lack thereof, the Democrats clearly need my money less than I need my conscience.  

I am through giving money to anyone who votes to fund the war with no strings. I am through giving money to the DCCC or DSCC.  And I am through giving to presidential candidates at least until there is a nominee, when we can evaluate the ticket and the platform.

I’m tired of hearing that Democrats don’t have the votes.  They have the votes not to appropriate no-strings money for the war.  

What they lack is not the votes, but the will, or, if you prefer, the guts.

It’s time to defund them.

POSTSCRIPT:  One blogger suggested that perhaps we could simply give the $70-billion directly to defense contractors and the oil industry, in exchange for being allowed to end the war.

Maybe there’s another way.  Let’s just buy enough members of Congress.  If we divide the money between the 535 members, we could give them about $131-million each. That should be enough to buy their votes to end the war. But if we only want to buy a veto-proof majority, we’d only have to pay two-thirds of them, so they could each get $195-million. They could each use it for whatever earmarked pet projects they’d like in their districts.  Maybe it would work.

Hard not to get cynical, isn’t it?  

Santa Delivers the Constitution to George W. Bush

http://www.ccrjustice.org/news…

“Americans from all over the country – more than 37,000 of them – asked that a copy of the Constitution be delivered to the President in their name and cordially requested that he make time in his busy schedule to read it.

“While I was going over the list of who’s been naughty and nice,” Mr. Claus said, as he prepared for his visit to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, “I heard from many people who feel the President hasn’t been doing a very good job of upholding his oath to ‘preserve, protect and defend’ the Constitution.”

Responding to an urgent request from the Center for Constitutional Rights, Claus stepped in to bring messages from Americans who felt the President might need a refresher course in the Constitution. Citizens want to remind President Bush that the Constitution forbids torture and spying on Americans without a warrant, requires that prisoners get a fair hearing of the charges against them before a real court and makes the government’s treaty obligations, such the Geneva Conventions, the law of the land.

“These Constitutions will make great holiday reading,” Claus continued. “I want to be sure that the President has plenty of time to look at them before he decides on his New Year’s resolutions.””

Dubya, hit the books!  

Friday Night at 8: Shell Game

There’s an essay by NLinStPaul that I just can’t stop thinking about.

It’s about how with the right resources, we can keep vulnerable children from a life of hopelessness and poverty.

I’ve been blogging about New Orleans and public housing lately.  There was one photo posted by the Times-Picayune showing a black woman who had complained about her new home, the plumbing was bad, the door was broken, etc.  The picture showed this woman in her apartment — it was very neat and clean.  But what caused a big buzz was her 60-inch television set.

In a visceral reaction, many folks condemned both the woman and a system that would enable “freeloaders” to have giant TV’s that other hard working and deserving folks couldn’t afford.  It just wasn’t fair.  That’s what I heard every time I’d read these comments, the eternal cry of a child who feels they are missing out on someone else’s good fortune.  “It isn’t fair!”

This reaction is nothing new.  Ronald Reagan pandered to this feeling when he blasted a woman on welfare for having a Cadillac and successfully turned middle-class Americans against the poor, because “It isn’t fair!”

‘Course this isn’t rational, we know that.  In our times, we are being robbed blind by our own federal government for wars of occupation, graft, patronage, you name it.

But we can’t fight the government, it seems, because the government is too big and powerful.

We can, however, find a scapegoat.  And the poor have always been there for that role.

It’s a shell game, of course.  And we all can be prey to it at one time or another, depending on which part of our psyche would make us cry out, “It isn’t fair!”  

We’re headed for some tough economic times ahead.  I think Americans are beginning to realize that, and it’s frightening.  Folks want to make sure their families will do all right.

In that kind of insecure time, who hasn’t had the fantasy of getting a free ride?  Wouldn’t it be nice, when you are struggling to make ends meet, to have a life where you weren’t harrassed by bills, where you didn’t have to work a job you might not like at all, just take it easy?  Wouldn’t that be wonderful?

And so if we look at a picture of someone on public assistance who has a big screen TV we might not be able to afford, perhaps that fantasy arises, and with it, resentment and fear.  And maybe even a little bit of jealousy.  And the projection finds a perfect screen for our frustration — and we think maybe ALL of those folks are just having a great old life and we have to work so hard — “It’s Not Fair!”

Of course, it’s not true.  The folks who lived on public assistance — if you check over at Daily Kos, mbair has an excellent diary with videos of three women, Julie, Geneva and Gilda.  They paint quite a different picture of American citizens from New Orleans who wish to go home, unlike the lady with the big old TeeVee who, by the way, made a lot of noise at that City Council meeting, to the dismay of a lot of folks.  She didn’t come off sweet at all.  Heh.

So I’m getting back to Pandora’s essay that I posted above, she talks about a kid who could have become a real pain in the ass to society — but because of folks who had expertise and experience, he instead is now clerking for a judge.

We can do this, you know.  We can lift people up out of poverty.  But it takes a commitment.

And we are entering hard economic times.  Unless you’re a billionnaire, it’s a scary reality.  And it is only human to want to gather your possessions around you and look very carefully at a person who is asking for help.

There are folks who understand this very well.  They are what I call the “hyenas,” the disaster capitalists who make a big bunch of money off of people’s suffering.

They’re not all evil folks.  Oscar Shindler was a war profiteer.  Then again, he did change his mind about that, didn’t he.  He ended up with very little monetary profit.

Anyway, sorry to digress.

The hyenas know that if they can turn the middle class against the poor, we’ll all be too busy fighting to see them picking our pockets.

Folks will be annoyed at those shiftless poor folks who seem to think housing is “a right”, while laughing hyenas will be fattening their wallets with juicy contracts and bribes.  Because if no one holds people in power responsible, some questionable deals will end up being made.  Well, that’s just my opinion, of course.

And if we’re all busy projecting our fears on everything but what is really causing this trouble, well the hyenas are happy happy campers.  Because no one is guarding the henhouse, ya know.  Oops.

We can uplift folks out of poverty and realize that all along they have been citizens we are proud to call neighbors.  We can all feel good about helping each other through the hard times ahead.  That is just a fact.  We can do this, we have the means, the expertise and we have the money, that is, if we can make sure it goes where it’s supposed to go.

But the hyenas would not like that.  They will do their best to throw up distractions so we can’t see whether or not we are acting in our own best interests.  The hyenas have great expertise and experience in this.

Peace on earth.  Good will towards men.  I won’t even hate the hyenas for now.  I will hope that they, like Oscar Schindler, will come to their senses and exchange greed for loving humanity.  It’s the holiday season, so I am making this wish.

But after the holidays, well …. you know … Nightprowlkitty!  SuperKitty of Justice!  Battered and bashed, but still unbowed!

Happy holidays from me to everyone in the world without exception, the good, the bad, the lovers, the haters, the mean and the kind.

And especially to my great fellow bloggers here at Docudharma.  This is the best fellowship I have ever joined, and I am increased by each and every one of you.  Thank you all.  

Pony Party: Merry-Holidays-All-Ye-Lurkers Edition

This is a call to all those who lurk around the Pony Parties… welcome! and please feel free to say hello. go ahead and leave a comment. be silly or serious. be profound or profane. just don’t recommend this pony party…

Tonight, I wanted to post this comment from ek hornbeck… it’s a wonderfully written short short short story. I didn’t want it to get lost, so enjoy it…

My ego and I sit in the bars… (2+ / 0-)

have a drink or two… play the juke box. And soon the faces of all the other people they turn toward mine and they smile. And they’re saying, “We don’t know your name, mister, but you’re a very nice fella.” My ego and I warm ourselves in all these golden moments. We’ve entered as strangers – soon we have friends. And they come over… and they sit with us… and they drink with us… and they talk to us. They tell about the big terrible things they’ve done and the big wonderful things they’ll do. Their hopes, and their regrets, and their loves, and their hates. All very large, because nobody ever brings anything small into a bar. And then I introduce them to my ego… and he’s bigger and grander than anything they offer me. And when they leave, they leave impressed. The same people seldom come back; but that’s envy, my dear. There’s a little bit of envy in the best of us.

Well, maybe one more…this gem from a new poster (and former lurker???), Faber

In my time zone… (4.00 / 9)

…the solstice comes at 10:08 PM tomorrow, in the midst of all the fizzle-and-bang of cultural convention.  We have lived for uncounted millions of years beneath the recurring circles of this particular sky; whether we choose to surface the fact to ourselves or not, we have evolved internal representations of them, deeper than words go.  The longest darkness, in which things quicken that will manifest as the days lengthen again…  We are equipped to know, without the news reaching us over the problematical, uncertain road from an imagined Jerusalem, that this is our time for birthing gods.  

Might I crave your indulgence and bring, to this party, one particularly starchy old red tomcat?  He really doesn’t get out enough, and I’ve a notion it would do him good.  

by: Faber @ Thu Dec 20, 2007 at 19:35:27 PST

and just one more, the last one, promise… but this wild… from notlightnessofbeing (we call him nlob); you’ll have to find his essay to read the rest…

don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me

don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me

don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me

don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me don’t touch me

and here’s the the Pony Party Power Posse… mwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!

Friday Philosophy: The Observer

Once upon a time…

…or maybe it was twice.  Come to think of it, it was definitely much more often than that.

It was, after all, all about the time.  Then again, it was also about the place and the people who were there and the things that happened.  So maybe I need to restart.

Once upon a spacetime, I was there.  I have been an observer.  Somehow I adopted the notion that it was important for me to observe and record.  If not me, who?

It all started with a vision, although it may have started before the vision and elsewhere.  That’s the trouble with spacetime.  One wherewhen’s herenow is another wherewhen’s therethen.  But for the life of us we keep counting the time.  Sometimes it becomes all too apparent that it is a dwindling resource.

But I’ve kept recording.  It is my nature.

Now available at Daily Kos

The search for sense in this existence is inward.  One dives as deeply as one dares.  The layers of the onion are carefully unwrapped to display more onion, ever deeper.  The fear is that eventually a layer will be removed and reveal The Void.  Dare I go that far?  Is it possible to observe that?

The search for sense, I’ve discovered, requires a metaphor…or several.  Darmok and Jilad at Tanagra.  Robyn sees a village and wonders why the people there cannot live in harmony.  Picard and Dathon at El-Adrel.  The task of teaching people to learn how to help others survive is assumed.  Shaka, when the walls fell.  Failure happens more often than not, but observing and relating and hoping people will learn continues.

We are all in this spacetime together.  The only way out is to live through it.  The question is, Are we going to contend or cooperate?  Shall we survive by working together for the mutual good or fail while insisting on individual benefit?  Does the village prosper through collaborate effort or sow the seeds of mutually assured destruction?

All I can do…and all I can ask others to do, is to choose the cooperative path…and mourn when it is not.  Kiteo, his eyes closed.  

And meanwhile spacetime changes.  And some placeday there will need to be a new observer.  Maybe the observer already exists.  Maybe there are many.  How would I know?

And maybe it is not too late to change this common experience, although I do not know if I have the energy or wisdom to contribute to that anymore.

I have my doubts if I can even manage to give my report…and often am confused about to whom it should be given.

And I am Oh, so very tired…and in search of a spark to rekindle the flame.

Tonight the days will begin to grow longer again.  May they signal the start of a new era in human interaction.



Nugget

Four at Four

Some news and the afternoon’s open thread.

  1. The Washington Post reports Federal judge hears CIA tapes case. “U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy… said he would consider the lawyers’ arguments for an urgent court inquiry into whether the destruction of the CIA tapes may have violated Kennedy’s June 2005 order requiring the government to preserve any evidence related to mistreatment of Guantanamo detainees… At the hour-long hearing, a Justice Department lawyer urged the judge to hold off on any investigation, saying such an inquiry could compromise a Justice Department probe that has recently been launched into the tapes’ destruction. [David Remes, an attorney for several detainees,] questioned why the court should trust the Justice Department, which may have been aware of the destruction of the CIA tapes, to now determine whether other Guantanamo-related evidence is being properly preserved.”

  2. Oh no! Asteroid on track for possible Mars hit! According to the Los Angeles Times, “An asteroid similar to the one that flattened forests in Siberia in 1908 could plow into Mars next month… Researchers attached to NASA’s Near-Earth Object Program, who sometimes jokingly call themselves the Solar System Defense Team, have been tracking the asteroid since its discovery in late November. The scientists, at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in La Cañada Flintridge, put the chances that it will hit the Red Planet on Jan. 30 at about 1 in 75… The Tunguska object broke up in midair, but the Martian atmosphere is so thin that an asteroid would probably plummet to the surface, digging a crater half a mile wide”. That’s before Martian primary voters can vote on Super-Tuesday.

  3. “The Sleuth” aka Mary Ann Akers of the Washington Post writes Gonzales has rough time tapping young minds for legal defense fund. “Buried by legal bills and hard up for cash, former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales hit the college speaking circuit last month hoping to rake in big bucks. Instead, he’s been raked over the coals, heckled or flat out turned down by students whose institutions he charges exorbitant fees to tap his amnesiac mind… Gonzales had become the subject of angry editorials and protests on campuses near and far. At the University of Florida last month, he was viciously heckled to the point that two students wearing black hoods and orange jumpsuits blaring the words “civil liberties”- impersonating prisoners at Abu Ghraib – walked on stage and stood next to the former attorney general as he spoke. (Until they were arrested.) It was a tough way to make $40,000. And it stands to get tougher.” Oh, BOO HOO! Cry me a river… AbuG shows up, mumbles, and makes more money than many of us make in a year. This isn’t work, this is a classic academia scam by politicians.

  4. Lastly, this little Iowa caucus vignette from The New York Times.

    “Who is your favorite author?” Aleya Deatsch, 7, of West Des Moines asked Mr. Huckabee in one of those posing-like-a-shopping-mall-Santa moments.

    Mr. Huckabee paused, then said his favorite author was Dr. Seuss.

    In an interview afterward with the news media, Aleya said she was somewhat surprised. She thought the candidate would be reading at a higher level.

    “My favorite author is C. S. Lewis,” she said.

Saluting the Veterans of the War on Christmas

For starters, I must give a hat tip to Brandon Friedman for coming up with that saying as we were going back and forth discussing sayings that we should be using this upcoming year.

But at this time of year, especially on Christmas time – a holiday where religion is now intertwined and nearly synonymous with a front running Presidential candidacy – we should celebrate some deserving yet underappreciated people. These battle tested, wounded and weary warriors whose crusade to engage, battle and fight with those “non-believers” and satan lovers (liberals too, no doubt) who are waging this War on Christmas.

How can we not take a moment to stop and thank those who stand tall and use every weapon at their disposal in order to fight a cataclysmic fight to the death against the godless souls who want to purge the world from celebrating the birth of the one who represents all “true Americans”.

 

People like Fred Thompson:

COLMES: Senator, you recently got the endorsement of Congressman Steve Young. And you were very happy about that. Steve King, excuse me. You were happy to get that endorsement. He recently initiated HR847, recognizing Christianity as a great faith, expressing support for Christmas. Is this a good use of Congress's time? Do you support that kind of legislation? Is this a good thing for this guy to be doing?

THOMPSON: I don't know anything about that bill. I know Congressman King though, and I would tend to think that anything he would do would be totally appropriate.

COLMES: …Are candidates trying to out-God each other? We keep hearing, you know — Mike Huckabee has been talked about a little while. Some people think there's a cross in his new add, Christian leader in one of the ads. Where do you stand on this issue of candidates trying to out- God each other in this race?

THOMPSON: Well, the candidates are going to have to make up their own minds about what they think is appropriate. There's no question that faith is important to us as a people, and it's important to our country. You know, the Declaration of Independence itself points out that our basic rights come from God and not from government, and that's been our tradition, and always will be.

“Our basic rights come from God and not from government, and that’s been our tradition, and always will be.” In response to a question about whether candidates are trying to “out-God” each other. Bravo, Grandpa Fred. A score of 97 on the unintentional comedy scale. Truly a brave soldier in the War on Christmas.

 

And to you, John Gibson, a brave Veteran with the excellent use of the battle tested “deny, deny, accuse” attack by (1) promoting himself and Mike Huckabee for predicting that this War would lead to someone like Huckabee making his ad as if he was provoked by the “political correctness pushing Christians out of the public square” and (2) condemning Huckabee for “upping the ante” over Bush in over-the-top messianic Christian crusader that was condemned for the public expression of his faith.

Yes!!! A Medal of Freedom for Mr. Gibson for denying that this is Huckabee’s fault, and that it was something he warned about – AND blaming it on the other side.

And as a highly decorated four star general in this War on Christmas who has been through three prior War’s as well, Bill O’Reilly, (this is a pretty funny article) who just this week went on the offensive with a brutal attack against Great Barrington that has been compared favorably to the “shot heard round the world”.

On this stealth surprise attack in the middle of the night, O’Reilly sent one of his top commanders and launched a devastating attack against the town council:

Watters told the council “You guys are attacking these Christmas lights here” and asked “is this some kind of ruse to de-emphasize Christmas?” Omigod. When a council member replied that “that is not an accurate statement” Watters asked him “what are your feelings regarding the Christmas lights?” He was told they were private feelings and none of his business, then was dressed down further by another member who told him they resented his accusations of attacking Christmas, or Christianity, and said they were asking very reasonable questions in trying to save the environment.

Major Watters is certainly due for a promotion after this bold and daring initiative where he literally put himself at risk and in the direct line of fire.

So with these inspiring stories of the Christmas War Vets, I now realize how proud I should be to have these brave Soldiers of God here to protect me in this long and ongoing War on Christmas – putting themselves at risk and laughing in the face of danger against the Godless souls who are slowly trying to suffocate Christmas out of this great country.

Next thing you know, they’ll be fighting against those who want to make it so the sales, songs, celebrating and decorations can’t start until after Halloween.

 

Will the Real Democratic Party Please Stand Up?

Submitted by feline on December 21, 2007 – 12:31pm.

The Democratic Party has morphed into a strange multi-headed creature over the last 10 – 15 years. I’m all for diversity, but when they can’t remember their own principles and vote consistently as a group, the Republicans and the Administration end up winning on legislation as if they were the majority.

The Dems are invested in the idea that voters are so fed up, we’ll vote for anyone that doesn’t have an R in front of their name. But, here’s the problem: I have no idea what the D means anymore.

Does it mean this?

CHARTER OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES

Or does it mean this?

Democratic Leadership Council

I had once had hopes that it meant this:

Congressional Progressive Caucus

(Remember when those used to be the ideals of the Party and not just a Caucus?! Sad…)

Anytime I see the word “New” anymore, I get really worried:

New Democrat Coalition

And I don’t know how a representative who identifies him/herself “conservative” even gets to have a D in front of their name:

The Blue Dog Coalition

(How in the hell did the Democratic National Committee let that start happening? Do these folks even know the Bylaws of the Party?)

Well, there you have it, the “Democratic Party”! It’s become so hybridized, I wouldn’t know some members of the Party unless they had the D in front of their name (with the exception of a few who actually seem to have read their Bylaws and the U.S. Constitution).

Every election cycle, the Democratic Party feels the need to reinvent itself in order to secure or gain a majority. Maybe if members of Congress with a D in front of their name would just adhere to the principles of the Democratic Party while they’re in office, they wouldn’t have to work so hard and waste so much money trying to convince the voters that they’re different from the Republicans.

We’re NOT STUPID, you know…

(That was my Andy Rooney, impersonation, I hope it was okay.)

Biden Repeats Call For Special Prosecutor and Other News

Photobucket

This past week, we learned that an administration official in the CIA had destroyed videotapes of the agency’s use of severe interrogation techniques on detainees held in secret, extra-legal prisons. Responsibility for this sad stain of dishonor on America’s integrity rests squarely with the president. The evidence destroyed depicted the president’s policy of snatching terrorist suspects from the streets of foreign countries, hiding them away in secret prisons, and torturing them. The president has created a culture of criminal misconduct and cover up, has injected politics into the administration of justice, and has made public policy a slave to his ideology. I have called for a special counsel to conduct a thorough but unbiased investigation of this matter.

snip

I do not make the call for a special counsel lightly. For 34 years, 16 years as the chairman or ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, I have been a supporter and steward of the Department of Justice. I still maintain the utmost respect and admiration for the career prosecutors who enforce our laws every day without bias. But when a president abandons our cherished national values of upholding the rule of law and respecting human dignity, and when he allows our system of justice to be influenced by partisan politics, the attorney general he appointed cannot preside over an investigation that goes to the heart of the administration’s conduct. In such circumstances, our law requires the appointment of a special counsel.

White House faces hearing on CIA tapes

The Bush administration has made its position clear in legal filings and now gets a chance to say it to a judge in open court: Hold off on inquiring about the destruction of CIA videotapes that showed suspected terrorists being interrogated.

U.S. District Judge Henry H. Kennedy ordered the hearing Friday over the objection of the Justice Department after lawyers raised questions about the possibility that other evidence also might have been destroyed.

Kiriakou in hot water for admitting the US has tortured?

As reported by  RAW STORY (with video), John Kiriakou, who led the squad which captured the suspected terrorist, told ABC’s Brian Ross that although he did not witness the waterboarding himself, fellow agents told him about it and said it broke Abu Zubaydah’s resistance in less than a minute.

Now the CIA has sent a “criminal referral” to the Justice Department to investigate whether Kiriakou disclosed classified information in that interview. However, according to CNN, these referrals rarely lead to criminal charges, and it is not yet clear whether there has been any violation.

Jonathan Turley

 

“I think it’s more than an inference at this point, which is one of the reasons there’s a call for a special prosecutor,” he said. “There are at least six identifiable crimes here, from obstruction of justice to obstruction of Congress, perjury, conspiracy, false statements, and what is often forgotten: the crime of torturing suspects.

   Added Turley, “If that crime was committed it was a crime that would conceivably be ordered by the president himself, only the president can order those types of special treatments or interrogation techniques.”

• obstruction of justice.

• obstruction of Congress.

• perjury.

• conspiracy.

• false statements.

• the crime of torturing suspects.

As long as the Nancy and Harry Collaboration Theatre doesn’t get involved in this, there is a chance that this could actually go somewhere! With WH lawyers involved, this COULD be the scandal (#8,742, iirc) that rips away the Bushco Cloak of Teflon and spurs both the media and the politicians to action. Conyers and Kennedy are on board, despite Jay Rockefellers insistence that there is nothing behind the curtain. If pursued, in my opinion this puts us one more juicy revelation/scandal away from people getting serious about going after Bushco. Despite the Dem leadership trying it’s best not to rock any boats.

Cross your fingers, but don’t hold yer breath.

who knows what secrets burned

WASHINGTON (AP) – Thick black smoke billowed from a fire Wednesday in Vice President Dick Cheney’s suite of offices in the historic Eisenhower Executive Office Building next to the White House.

Cheney’s office was damaged by smoke and water from fire hoses, White House spokesman Scott Stanzel said. The vice president was not in the building at the time; he was in the West Wing of the White House with President Bush.

More than 1,000 people who work in the building were evacuated. The fire broke out on the second floor of the building around about 9:15 a.m. and was under control within a half hour, District of Columbia fire department spokesman Alan Etter said.  source

Cheney was in the White House with President George W. Bush receiving their morning intelligence briefings when the blaze erupted and people were evacuated from the Eisenhower Executive Office Building safely, White House officials said.

Thick black smoke billowed from the second floor of the hulking granite structure, which is part of the White House compound and faces the West Wing of the presidential mansion.

Firefighters quickly brought the fire under control. The cause was being investigated.

 Reuters

The incident brings this to mind:

 

In a tiny government office in Zirndorf, Georg Schleyer takes handfuls of ripped up bits of paper out of a sack and arranges them on his desk.

As more and more scraps emerge from the bag, the jumble of fragments grows bigger and more intriguing. I can make out the code names of secret agents, there are torn-up photos and twisted lengths of microfilm.

These are the files of the Stasi – the former East Germany’s Ministry of State Security. They are secrets the Stasi had tried to destroy, but which are now being pieced back together.

(…)

“Sometimes I get so excited with my work, I miss my lunch break,” Georg says.

“Once I even forgot to go home. What I’m doing is important. I’m helping to bring the history of East Germany back to life. So that former citizens of the GDR will have the chance to find out who spied on them, and why.”

No secret police force in history has ever spied on its own people on a scale like the Stasi.

Some calculations have concluded that in East Germany there was one informer to every seven citizens Back-to-back, the files would have stretched more than 100 miles (161km).

So when the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, panic-stricken Stasi officers had mountains of classified files to destroy. Unluckily for then, the shredding machines could not cope with the sheer volume of paper and broke down. So the Stasi resorted to ripping files up by hand.

But the secrets did not die. More than 600 million scraps were recovered, put in sacks and stored. Georg and his team of puzzlers have pieced some back together. But it would take them more than 400 years to finish the job by hand.

Now, though, computers may speed up the solution.

At the Fraunhofer Institute in Berlin, scientist Jan Schneider shows me how the new software works. As he feeds Stasi scraps into a scanner, the pieces appear on a giant monitor ready to be sorted and matched.

“It’s like a grand jigsaw puzzle,” Jan explains.

 

“Just like in a jigsaw, where you sort the pieces into sky, trees and so on, so here too in the computer you sort the snippets – according to their background colour, the colour of the writing, whether they’re typewritten or handwritten. After that the search space is small enough to puzzle.”

Then Jan presses a button and, almost magically, the different fragments dance around the screen before joining together into a single document.

There are more than 16,000 sacks of Stasi scraps to get through.

Experts believe that hidden inside are some of the Stasi’s darkest secrets – untold stories of spies and informers, of undercover operations in the West and repression at home. It is thought that computers could process the entire contents within five years.

Repressive memories

In her living room, former dissident Ursula Poppe shows me some of her Stasi files, which have already been pieced back together.

She has discovered that more than 80 people had been spying on her in the GDR. Now Ursula wants all the Stasi files repaired – to remind Germans how repressive the East German regime was.

“More and more people feel nostalgic because many of them feel the time now is not better than the time in the past,” Ursula tells me.

“They forget the bad situations, the repression and the gap of freedom. So I think it’s very important to get a realistic view of the GDR past.”

The Stasi had torn that past into shreds. But with computers handling the pieces, the biggest and most sinister jigsaw puzzle in history may soon be completed. BBC, May 25, 2007

And this:

BERLIN — THROUGHOUT the 1980’s, Sascha Anderson, a poet, musician and literary impresario, was one of the leading voices to speak out against the East German government and its dreaded secret police, the Stasi.

But his credibility gradually evaporated after the Communist government’s collapse as rumors about him acquired the weight of proof: he had been informing on his dissident compatriots all along.

He had been told that his Stasi file had been destroyed. In fact, it was manually reconstructed from some of the millions of shreds of paper that panicked Stasi officials threw into garbage bags during the regime’s final days in the fall of 1989.

Now, if all goes as planned by the German government, the remaining contents of those 16,000 bags will also be reconstructed.

Advanced scanning technology makes it possible to reconstruct documents previously thought safe from prying eyes, sometimes even pages that have been ripped into confetti-size pieces. And although a great deal of sensitive information is stored digitally these days, recent corporate scandals have shown that the paper shredder is still very much in use.

“People perceive it as an almost perfect device,” said Jack Brassil, a researcher for Hewlett-Packard who has worked on making shredded documents traceable. If people put a document through a shredder, “they assume that it’s fundamentally unrecoverable,” he said. “And that’s clearly not true.”

(…)

Modern image-processing technology has made the rebuilding job a lot easier. A Houston-based company, ChurchStreet Technology, already offers a reconstruction service for documents that have been conventionally strip-shredded into thin segments. The company’s founder, Cody Ford, says that reports of document shredding in recent corporate scandals alerted him to a gap in the market. “Within three months of the Enron collapse at end of 2001, we had a service out to electronically reconstruct strip shreds,” he said.  source

Hmmm… guess word got around?

meanwhile back in the US

back in the US,

back in the USSA

East Germany’s Ministry for State Security, known as the Stasi, featured probably the most comprehensive internal security operation of the Cold War. The Stasi built an astonishingly widespread network of informants — researchers estimate that out of a population of 16 million, 400,000 people actively cooperated. The Stasi kept files on up to 6 million East German citizens — one-third of the entire population.

The Stasi operated with broad power and remarkable attention to detail. All phone calls from the West were monitored, as was all mail. Similar surveillance was routine domestically. Every factory, social club and youth association was infiltrated; many East Germans were persuaded or blackmailed into informing on their own families.

The Stasi kept close tabs on all potential subversives. Stasi agents collected scent samples from people by wiping bits of cloth on objects they had touched. These samples were stored in airtight glass containers and special dogs were trained to track down the person’s scent. The agency was authorized to conduct secret smear campaigns against anyone it judged to be a threat; this might include sending anonymous letters and making anonymous phone calls to blackmail the targeted person. Torture was an accepted method of getting information.   source

The Stasi not only tapped every telephone call going into and out of the West Berlin office of the federal OPC, it could access personal details of every single West Berlin resident by using a secret code to penetrate the city’s official computers.   source

a little internet nostalgia here…

The East German Ministry for State Security, known as Stasi, worked closely with the KGB. Like the KGB it was responsible for both internal repression and espionage abroad. Naturally Stasi played an important role in the disinformation campaign. With German efficiency, Stasi explained in a 1969 report how it conducted disinformation:

Periodicals will address specific persons and groups.  One can select actual events, problems etc. using a mixture of truths, half truths, fiction and other well conceived interpretations, so the recipient finds them believable, thus causing the anticipated success. Exact knowledge of conditions within the particular government in the operational area is imperative. Absolutely necessary is thorough knowledge of western language use, as well as psychological, sensitive tactics in approach.

Stasi also explained how it responded to those who exposed human rights violations in the communist empire. It considered the truth about communism “harassment” and said in its report, “Through distribution of aggressively directed messages, the enemy will be disinformed and forced to abandon his harassment campaign thus keeping him disturbed and pointlessly occupied.”    source

Naw, no conspiracies anymore… the world got over that.  Right.

‘Long Shot’ Kucinich Buries Democratic Rivals in Nationwide Poll Among Independent Voters