Exposing the Lies in the 2012 Democratic National Platform

(4 pm. – promoted by ek hornbeck)

Cross posted from The Stars Hollow Gazette

The Democratic National Convention formally convenes at 5 PM EDT in Charlotte, North Carolina. The 2012 Democratic National Platform was released to the press Monday afternoon. I haven’t read it in its entirety but  I was drawn to read the housing section because of these two tweets from FDL‘s David Dayen:

Stabilizing the Housing Market and Hard-Hit Communities.

For more than a decade, irresponsible lenders tricked buyers into signing subprime loans while too many homeowners got in over their heads by buying homes they couldn’t afford. But when the housing bubble burst, it hurt everyone, including responsible homeowners who played by the rules, but saw their home values decline and their neighbors’ houses sit vacant. The housing market’s dramatic collapse did more than punish millions of innocent Americans; it also triggered the economy’s downward spiral into recession. President Obama took swift action to stabilize a housing market in crisis, helping five million families restructure their loans to help them stay in their homes, making it easier for families to refinance their mortgages and save hundreds of dollars a month, and giving tax credits to first-time home buyers. He also cracked down on fraudulent mortgage lenders and other abuses that contributed to the housing crisis. Democrats have held the largest financial institutions accountable by requiring them to provide relief for homeowners still struggling to pay their mortgages and to change practices that took advantage of homeowners. Democrats also understand the importance of helping communities fightback against the foreclosures that threaten entire neighborhoods, which is why the President proposed to expand the successful neighborhood stabilization efforts in his American Jobs Act. Too many people still owe more on their homes than they are worth. That is why Democrats are fighting to give every responsible homeowner the chance to refinance their home, spurring investment in communities that have been hit hardest by foreclosure, and taking whatever steps we can to avoid more foreclosures. The President remains committed to creating an economy that’s built to last, where homeownership is an achievable dream for all Americans

Emphasis mine

David is right, this has to be the most outrageous lie since Paul Ryan took to the stage at the RNC Convention.

From the September 1 New York Times Editorial: Still No Justice for Mortgage Abuses:

The Office of Mortgage Settlement Oversight, the monitor of the settlement, released a preliminary report last week showing that 138,000 homeowners had received some form of relief from March 1 through June 30. That is roughly the number that would have been expected under various aid programs in effect before the settlement. Worse, with some three million borrowers now in or near foreclosure, according to Moody’s Analytics, it is nowhere near the level of relief needed to fix the housing market. [..]

Short sales are better than foreclosures, in part because they prevent vacancies that depress house values. But they are not punishment for wrongdoing in any meaningful sense; rather, they allow banks to get higher prices for underwater properties than they could have gotten in foreclosure sales.

Nor do they fulfill the settlement’s main purpose: to keep underwater borrowers in their homes by reducing the principal on their mortgage loans. According to the monitor’s report, $8.7 billion of debt has been written off in short sales versus only $750 million of principal reduction from loan modifications.

And the fraud continues, thanks to MERS. Don’t let the rosy housing price increases fool you:

(N)ew foreclosures continued to be filed – 256,000 people had a foreclosure added to their credit reports in the June quarter – but that figure was the lowest since mid-2007, the Fed said.

In stark contrast to this improving backdrop are the legal battles still being waged over wrongful foreclosure practices. The glacial progress in these cases is not surprising, given the crowded courts and combatants’ usual stalling tactics.

What is surprising is the fresh evidence these cases are turning up of cockeyed mortgage practices, during both the boom and the bust. As these matters are adjudicated, perhaps we will finally learn whether these practices were intended or accidental. [..]

A foreclosure from Ohio highlights this problem. The facts from this matter are central to a prospective class action filed by a borrower, who contends he was charged improper court costs and legal-related fees in his foreclosure.

The case involved legal moves taken against a bank in 2007 that did not even have an interest in either of the two mortgage liens associated with the foreclosed property. Even though the bank should never have been dragged into the matter, it was – generating $775 in court costs and legal fees paid by the borrower, documents show. Only two years later, during the discovery process, did it emerge that the bank had no ownership in the underlying property.

That $775 may not sound like much. But Paul Grobman, a lawyer in New York who represents the borrower, said he believed the collection of what he called improper legal charges is rampant in foreclosures.

Here is the entire platform:

Document the lies.

 

13 comments

Skip to comment form

    • TMC on September 4, 2012 at 10:02 am
      Author
  1. In addition to the issue of mortgage fraud which I think is an old issue guess what, banking policies have radically changed.  There is a screw-tiny today that even if you have excellent credit you still might not get a mortgage.

    They are making people pay off car loans, even zero percent loans but your 21 percent credit card debt is not a problem.

    If you have a house an elderly parent lives in but your elder care attorney changed it to your name then all of the expenses for that house get charged to your debt ratio.

    If your job is “temporary” you have no income.

    If the bank thinks your property could be a business/if you are thinking of starting a business with/on your property within say five years you won’t get a mortgage.

    If the property you want to buy has generated any red flags with the local town government you won’t get a mortgage.

    OK, so in addition to mortgage fraud we also have something I am still trying to get a handle on.  The insurance/government alliance.  You local building inspector(now a Code Enforcement Officer, note the fascism) used to be concerned with building construction quality.  This has morphed into such “safety” issues such as pool fences, verboten breeds of dogs, trampolenes, bicycle helmet enforcement policies and or brushing ALL the snow off the roof of your car.  Anyway by telling the local “Code Enforcement Officer” he might be legally responsible for “lax” code enforcement keeps insurance payouts low.

    • banger on September 5, 2012 at 5:25 pm

    I said that I may disagree with the Dems policy positions but at least they have inclusive rhetoric. I think the rhetoric and the symbolism of the Dem Party is important and means a lot to people who have been historically excluded from particularly after the Republican Convention which made, other than obvious cosmetic devices, any effort to include the whole country–they thrive on them against us rhetoric.

    Consequences: I think a Democratic Party dominated country is less miserable than a Republican Party dominated country.

    Now policy, that’s another matter. Either way we have parties that have no problem with ignoring rule-of-law, the Constitution. Both parties believe in Empire, both parties believe in making nice with the oligarchy which has become, increasingly, an international affair. But this movement is historical and inevitable. There is no way to have a truly progressive regime in this country–that possibility has been foreclosed.

    Americans have chosen to use their success to be self-indulgent and narcissistic collectively and individually and thus we have what we have. They could have chosen to educate themselves, help each other out, and try to build a better world for the future–but that didn’t happen and it’s too late now to do much about it. Keeping the hypocritical language up is something at least as La Rochefoucauld famously said:

    Hypocrisie est un hommage que la vice rend a la vertu. (Hypocrisy is a tribute vice pays to virtue.)

Comments have been disabled.