An Executive Order to Stop Union Busting?

(2 pm. – promoted by ek hornbeck)

Posted earlier at both Progressive Blue and DailyKos.

The headline on this video page that has a transcript is White House could use power of federal contracting to enforce labor laws, but has no plans to do so. The Executive Order in question that would force large corporations into behaving responsibly toward workers is about laws that already exist but are not enforced, about an executive order that was signed by President Bill Clinton and then squashed by George W. Bush.

ELK: So there are currently laws on the book that say that if a company breaks the law, they can be debarred from bidding on federal contracts, meaning they can’t get federal contracts. It’s currently in this country illegal to fire a worker from their job for joining a union, but 20,000 workers a year are either fired or disciplined for trying to join a union, both of which are illegal. One-third of all, you know, union organizing drives, somebody gets fired from their job. Over 130,000 companies are federal contractors. All the big companies get some type of federal contract. If you say–if you enforce these laws, these laws about how to debar companies, these companies wouldn’t get contracts anymore.

It is the type of executive order that could get Union workers back in the mood for volunteering and getting active in supporting all the other Democrats who will be running in 2012.  

The interview came after Tuesday May 10 when Mike Elk wrote Obama Has Power to Stop Unionbusting With a Stroke of His Pen  

In the last part of the Clinton administration, when Podesta was White House Chief of Staff, the government issued executive orders to implement “high road” contracting practices that would have enforced laws on the books barring companies that broke labor, safety, and environmental laws from receiving federal contracts. President Bill Clinton’s “contractor responsibility rule” would have created guidelines, a centralized database and data standards to prevent bad actor corporations from receiving government contracts. (The George W. Bush administration ended up blocking implementation of the orders.)

But just a few days later and the enthusiasm seems to be already gone. How can you support such an executive order?

17 comments

Skip to comment form

    • Eddie C on May 16, 2011 at 10:10 pm
      Author

    that the people always come last in this nation.  

    • TMC on May 16, 2011 at 11:13 pm

    different from Obama than I did from Bushm just in case he does something that vaguely supports the majority of Americans. That way I will be pleasantly surprised.

  1. busy union busting in Chicago.  

    • mplo on May 17, 2011 at 3:04 pm

    It was obvious from Day One (inotherwords, long before the 2008 POTUS Election), when Obama voted for the FISA Bill, continued funding for our war on Iraq, the promise to escalate, extend and expand our war in Afghanistan (which Obama has most certainly done), and when he took the exact same positions as John McCain during the pre-POTUS election Foreign Policy debate that the election of Barack Obama as President of the United States would result in more of the same old-same old, nothing different, really.

    I figured that, whether it was  Obama or McCain who got the nod, that we’d continue to get screwed as a country.  

  2. My little Co. gets small government contracts, sometimes paying just over the minimum Davis Bacon Act limits but my employers routinely ignore it and only pay prevailing wage rates when the contracting entity asks about it which I estimate to be less that 40% of the time.

     

Comments have been disabled.