Recession Ends; Nobody Notices

( – promoted by buhdydharma )

  The National Bureau of Economic Research declared this week that the Great Recession ended over a year ago. Yet, for some reason, the average American isn’t ready to break out the champagne.

 “Every single one of the individuals who wrote the report needs a serious reality check,” said Bob Johnson of the Queens borough of New York, who is 46, had worked in communications and has been looking for a job for more than three years.

 The American working class is hurting. The unemployment rate is only marginally down from the peak and the economy has been losing jobs over the last three months. Households were $1.5 Trillion poorer last quarter, and $12.3 Trillion poorer than three years ago. Most of this is reflected in the crushed dreams of retirement. The poverty rate is at a 15-year high.

Image Hosted by

 Nevertheless, the economy is improving, right? That depends on who you ask.

  Clearly the American consumer doesn’t believe that the recession is over.

 This week 89 percent of Americans rate the economy negatively, 75 percent say it’s a bad time to spend money and 55 percent rate their own finances negatively.

Image Hosted by

The Gallup poll showed very similar findings.

Image Hosted by

Image Hosted by

 So what does this mean? Economists, the financial media, politicians and industry leaders think that it means nothing. They consider the consumer, and thus +90% of the population, either a lagging indicator or irrelevant.

 Of course they aren’t going to tell you that because, well, it sounds so darn elitist. They have their numbers and charts, and, you see, you just aren’t as smart as them.

 That’s what they honestly believe.

The idea that they aren’t as smart as they think they are, hasn’t occurred to them. The idea that their charts don’t accurately represent reality is not something they will ever consider.

 In reality, they are prisoners in a cave of their own making.

Allegory of the Economic Cave

 Around 2,400 years ago Plato created an allegory of prisoners chained for life in a cave. All they could see was shadows on a wall. Thus the shadows became their reality.

 “And if they were in the habit of conferring honors among themselves on those who were quickest to observe the passing shadows and to remark which of them went before, and which followed after, and which were together; and who were therefore best able to draw conclusions as to the future, do you think that he would care for such honors and glories, or envy the possessors of them?”

 The charts and reports that economists present to us are only shadows of reality. They are mere representations and caricatures of a slice of the real economy that is distorted by interpretation and dogma.

  The economist who can more quickly draw conclusions and predict the next shadow gets honors and glories from his peers.

 Of course the economist who gets the honors and glories isn’t one who predicts recessions. Any economist who predicts bad news either doesn’t exist, or is held up for ridicule.

 In fact there were economists that predicted what happened.

Nouriel Roubini in 2006, Peter Schiff in 2005, Fred Harrison in 1997, and Hyman Minsky in the 1980’s all predicted scenario’s that were far too accurate to be considered just luck.

  The same economists that didn’t listen to these cassandra’s before the crisis are now embracing the recovery that most Americans say doesn’t exist. What could they be missing?

Image Hosted by

 For starters, economists generally don’t look at how wealth is distributed. They have conscientiously decided to not consider class in their calculations. By doing so they are missing an monumental change in the economy.

 As Andrew Sum and Joseph McLaughlin of Northeastern University’s Center for Labor Market Studies have documented, pretax corporate profits increased $388 billion from the low point of the current recession, the second quarter of 2009, to the third quarter thereafter, while wages increased just $68 billion. At a comparable point in the 1981-82 recession, corporate profits came to just 10 percent of the combined uptick in profits and wages. This time around, they amount to 85 percent.

  A similar tale can be told about employers and health insurance, the costs of which have continued to rise. It’s not the employers, however, who have borne those increases. A survey, released Thursday by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research & Educational Trust,  shows that employee premiums rose 13.7 percent over last year, while the amount that employers contributed dropped — dropped! — 0.9 percent.

   Only a purblind ideologue could miss the pattern here. American employers — more than employers in other nations and more than American employers in earlier downturns — have imposed the costs of the recession and, increasingly, the costs of doing business, on their workers, and kept for themselves damn near all the proceeds from doing business.

 All of the economic models are based on a system in which people and businesses will “trickle down” the wealth. When profits go up, businesses will hire. That’s a basic premise that economists simply won’t question, even when the facts show otherwise.

  That’s why economists always support tax cuts for the wealthy – because they are supposed to spend it and “trickle down” the wealth. Once again, the facts show otherwise, but economists won’t update their models. And why should they update those models, when they don’t even acknowledge the fact that class influences spending and consumption patterns?

Image Hosted by

 Which brings us back to the current economic conditions, which are the worst since the Great Depression.

  Has the economy made some progress since the summer of 2009? Yes, but only at the expense of unprecedented amounts of deficit spending. Between the wars, the bailouts, and the stimulus packages, we’ve run up a deficit of nearly 10% of GDP. This is unsustainable.

 The really disturbing part is how little we have to show for this increased debt burden.

Image Hosted by

Image Hosted by

  What we’ve seen is a cyclical upturn in a larger secular downturn (as witnessed by the large percentage of GDP growth coming from inventory build-up), just like we saw in the 1930’s. But we can’t call this a Depression because there is no accepted definition of what a Depression is.

 That’s not to say that some aren’t trying to define it.

 This is what a depression is all about – an economy that 33 months after a recession begins, with zero policy rates, a stuffed central bank sheet, and a 10% deficit-to-GDP ratio, is still in need of government help for its sustenance.

  A depression usually involved a liquidity trap. In other words, expunging the debt excesses of the previous cycle leads to an ongoing contraction of credit where the demand and supply of loan-able funds is basically non-existent. This is why Libor (three-month interbank) rates are down to five-month lows of under 0.3%.

  You know it’s a depression when, 33 months after the onset of recession…

   * Wages & salaries are still down 3.7% from the prior peak;

   * Corporate profits are still down 20% from the peak;

   * Real GDP is still down 1.3% from the peak;

   * Industrial production is still down 7.2% from the peak;

   * Employment is still down 5.5% from the peak;

   * Retail sales are still down 4.5% from the peak;

   * Manufacturing orders are still down 22.1% from the peak;

   * Manufacturing shipments are still down 12.5% from the peak;

   * Exports are still down 9.2% from the peak;

   * Housing starts are still down 63.5% from the peak;

   * New home sales are still down 68.9% from the peak;

   * Existing home sales are still down 41.2% from the peak;

   * Non-residential construction is still down 35.7% from the peak

  In a normal recession-recovery cycle, practically all these indicators are making new highs at this juncture of the business cycle.

 The reason is because this isn’t a business cycle recession. This is a secular Depression. The reason for that is because the wealth has been increasingly distributed up to the top 1% who are saving the money rather than spending it like the working class would.

Image Hosted by

  Asset prices, like stocks and bonds, rise because of this is where the rich save their money. However, real final sales decline because most of the population is hurting.

Image Hosted by

 While this statistical “recovery” can continue for years to come, the working class will continue to struggle. As long as we continue to embrace these failed economic policies, the jobless recovery that no one but a statistician can see, will become the “new normal” – a permanent lowering of living standards for the working class. The jobless recovery will become the homeless recovery.

  If this is to change, it must come from below. We must accept that class does make a difference, and that the wealthy elite do not have our best interests at heart.

 It’s not class warfare to say this. It’s simply a matter of recognizing shadows from reality.


Skip to comment form

    • gjohnsit on September 22, 2010 at 19:14

    I still had a bunch more charts I could use, but that would be chart overload.

  1. ….  resumes retail remission.  Republicans rebuke, rebankers repossess, redemocrats relament.

    Remorse reassumes.  

    • Edger on September 22, 2010 at 20:07

  2. …. so I get a letter from the bank with my miniscule IRA account, which might be the world’s smallest,  and it says, roughly-

    “We haven’t heard from you in so long, we don’t even know if you’re alive. Please update your contact information.  Now is your opportunity to change to a fixed rate. ”

    I had to have my spouse answer that sort of thing.  If there is a literalist at the other end, no telling what they would do if I let loose with one of my riffs.

    No, you can’t suck more blood out of a rutabaga, and if my fooking sister wants to inherit, she can contact you herself after I croak, and I’m not giving you her **** **** social security number !

  3. set of definitions and charts for a long time, that track the relative prosperity of the working class in terms such as assets, taxes, available funds, credit liabilities or assets, and income over time.

    What I would have in mind would be something of a stacked bar graph with these various items represented in color and possibly several different versions of these separated by demographic factors.

    Items below the zero point in the graph would represent liabilities and debts and tax burdens; items above the zero point would represent assets and income, all corrected for inflation.

    This would be combined with a normalized line graph for each of the items in the stacked bar chart indicating change over time.

    Possibly this already exists and I just don’t know about it, heh.

  4. this book review from The Nation which has an excellent discussion of the financial meltdown and the contradictions inherent in the capitalist system.

    Bottom line – wealth comes from labor, not from finance. We may be able to pay tomorrow for a cheeseburger today, but we can’t have it today and pay 100 years later, which is what finance has been attempting to do.

    We know why everyone owes everyone: because there was fresh dough to be made in extending credit, until there wasn’t. What we don’t know is, Why can’t anyone pay? Why didn’t property values ascend forever? Why didn’t the market just keep expanding? This is not a question answered by Johnson and Kwak either. It is, let’s say, above their pay grade (or perhaps far below). To tell the story, one would need an account of where value actually comes from. This is not impossibly complex; unlike the niceties of derivatives, it’s not rocket science. If value is generated by people laboring to produce stuff that gets sold, and profit comes from exploiting the productive value of labor-this is a simplification, of course, but not a mistake-sooner or later people will have to labor productively to make good on any extended credit. By people I mean people.

    But this becomes decreasingly likely, until it is impossible. Promises to do all that work later will reach limits, particularly as companies cut labor costs, replace workers with machines and outsource work to overseas markets. New value, arising only from the discrepancy between wages and productivity, appears elsewhere when it appears at all (witness the growth of India and China). Or it appears to glimmer in the future: credit is the name for spending it now. But even the future has a limited number of hours, technically. Meanwhile, over in the finance sector, where the money seemed so recently to reside, there is only a genteel, bloody struggle over how existing value is divided; no new value is created. The gap between value that can be realized and “fictitious capital”-claims on future value, all those derivatives purling through the purportedly new economy-has become a chasm. No one can vault over it any longer.

  5. That didn’t mean we weren’t still in one.  The recession that began under Bush never ended, and has since then grown into a full-blown depression from which America is unlikely to ever recover.  The recession ends when Americans are put back to work, when unemployment dips to negligible levels, when wages are set to keep up with inflation, when the rich are taxed into a much bracket, when people are no longer losing their homes.

  6. The U.S. government spent nearly $400 billion, mostly through tax breaks, in 2009 to promote home ownership and other wealth-building strategies, and more than half of that benefited the wealthiest 5 percent of taxpayers, said the study sponsored by the nonprofit Annie E. Casey Foundation and the Corporation for Enterprise Development (CFED).

    Wealthy benefit most from tax subsidies: study

    The commission, which is looking at these and other so-called tax expenditures as well as direct spending, is to report its recommendations in December.

    “We can ill afford a federal wealth-building strategy that primarily helps those who are already wealthy,” the report concludes. “Redirecting the federal dollars spent on building assets more equitably would not only help poor families gain a foothold in the economy, it would fortify middle-class households,” the report added.

Comments have been disabled.