More Than One Truth

(11AM EST – promoted by Nightprowlkitty)

As our own Dharmasyd essayed about today, Glen Ford writing at Black Agenda Report said on Wednesday “We Are Cornered: There’s No Way Out Without A Fight”: “Obama and his Democratic legislative allies have successfully shielded their Wall Street masters from anything worthy of the name financial reform.”, and “The pace of finance capital deterioration quickens, accelerating the timetable of the Right’s offensive. As the hunger grows, Wall Street’s servants become more aggressive and demanding, and there is nothing in the Democratic Party, as presently constituted, to stop them.”

Ford closed his essay with: “One truth remains: only a massed people can defeat massed capital. If the American Left is capable of bearing that in mind in the critical times ahead, it might just escape the cul-de-sac and make some modest contribution to the world.”

Ford is right about many things, but wrong about one thing.

There is more than one truth.

Give me a lever long enough, and a place to stand, and I will move the Earth

— Archimedes

There is a enormous and powerful difference between millions of people not voting for a particular party, and millions of people saying loud and clear to that party: “we guarantee will give you millions of votes, more than enough to tip the scale…… once you have done a or b or c or d or any combination of those things, and as soon as we see that you’ve done that you can relax in the confidence that you have won even before election day arrives, otherwise you’ve already lost and you might as well tell your corporate donors now that their money has been pissed away for absolutely nothing and that you were an utter and pathetic waste of their time, and quit campaigning”.

It takes planning, and it takes a determination to make decisions not out of fear but out of the power and leverage you know you have, but have only if you use it.

The best that can happen with this approach is beyond your wildest dreams, and the worst that can happen with this is that if nobody else does it while you do you won’t be defending yourself after the fact for having voted for people who could have done their jobs but wouldn’t.

The majority of responses that message draws from Democrats boil down to “but… but… republicans!!!”

Much of the remainder of the responses it draws are some attempt to justify “give them more time”, to justify waiting on a supposedly incrementally arrived at ultimate reward at some undefined future date that continually recedes, like heaven, after death.

The Democrats won the 2006 midterms effectively by running on an end the Iraq war platform. The first major thing they did afterwards was to betray the voters with the first emergency supplemental war funding passed by a democratic congress after eight years of Repblican congressional control. The result was a folding of hands by the fake democratic antiwar movement who showed themselves to be really only interested in democratic wins, but not in progressive results.

The incrementalists have already lost all the ground they were afraid of losing while the Democrats have had years to “incrementalize” their way into producing good progressive results. They haven’t done so, and the result is now an effectively Republican and corporatist congress and president who are Democrats in name only.

That Democrats are politicians, and being politicians will do whatever it takes to win the votes they need means that the fear of republicans or the fear of losing ground is a phantom fear if enough people threaten all Democrats with extreme loss of votes unless and until they all realize that they will all face political oblivion unless they all band together and do something useful to win those votes back, which they will do because they are politicians and they need those votes to survive politically.

It’s an eyeball to eyeball poker game right down to election day, and it cannot be a bluff from the voters.

People have to be strong enough to say to the Democrats, “Look, if you’re going to ACT like republicans then we’re going to let republicans have your jobs you fools – now get busy and PRODUCE some useful progressive legislation or you’re history. Come back when you’ve produced, and I guarantee you my vote” – and mean it.

All Democrats, being politicians, will do it for the votes they need, and if on the off chance they’re too stupid to do it then they aren’t worth your vote anyway.

It’s called voting for results instead of promises.

In the face of a movement of millions of poeple, more than enough to tip the electoral balance, Obama and the Democrats will finally wake up and realize they need the independent and liberal votes they’ve thrown away since inauguration day last year, and that all the corporate donations in the world aren’t going to save them without those votes, and start producing some useful progressive legislation and pass it in time for the midterms.

They could have independents and liberals all across the country rewarding them for results instead of turning their backs on empty promises and the largest landslides in history this November with just a few simple moves.

Creating and passing an actual, real, universal single payer health care bill and rolling back the bailout of the insurance industry for example might do it all by itself, for example.

Although they could probably sew it right up it for themselves by also starting torture and war crimes trials for Bush and Cheney, while withdrawing from Iraq and Afghanistan and breaking up the big Wall Street investment banks and doing Ken Lay numbers on Goldman Sachs‘s Lloyd Blankfein and Magnetar‘s Alec Litowitz, while firing Tim Geithner, Ben Bernanke, and Rahm Emanuel, and now Robert Gibbs, too.

They’ve got two whole months, after all.

Democrats are smart people. They should be at least half as smart as all those independent and progressives who won’t vote for them unless they begin to do those things.

After all, Obama and the Democrats can’t possibly be stupid enough to actually believe that independents and liberals are stupid enough to to vote to continue being screwed by them, can they?

And really, all they really need to do is start just one of those things and the republicans would be history in November.

This is not a sport we’re talking about. It is, however, the future of America, and a choice of who rules it. Bought and paid for politicians. Or voters.

The Democrats will hate you for saving their asses this fall.

Let them hate, so long as they fear.

— Lucius Accius

There is an election coming up…

“My father made him an offer he couldn’t refuse… Luca Brasi held a gun to his head, and my father assured him that either his brains, or his signature would be on the contract”.


Skip to comment form

    • Edger on August 28, 2010 at 3:42 am

    One of power taken back by voters, or one of leverage lost forever by voters because it wasn’t used.

    Who is going to play the other like a violin this fall? Democrats? Or Voters?

  1. They think they haven’t “sold” their good deeds enough.

  2. reading this piece up on their FP…. about Blue Dogs and conservadems positioned to lose their seats in Nov.

    In other words, the Blue Dogs and their conservadem fellow travelers engineered their own downfall by putting their simplistic (and highly selective) “fiscal conservatism” ahead of the wellbeing of their constituents and the country as a whole.

    It’s a pity they’re not self-aware enough to realize that opposing the public good can have adverse electoral consequences, because it’s something they really should keep in mind when it comes time to vote on the Catfood Commission’s recommendations to gut Social Security.  And Obama might want to think about it too, before he signs anything into law.

    Simply put, the best way to survive a backlash election is to not invite one.

    Question. Why do they even bother drafting a Party Platform? Do any of those politicians ever actually read it? I mean the 2008 Dem Platform is really not very far off from stating my wish list.

    Good essay edger, sorry Im kinda tired…

  3. …To accomplish what needs to be accomplished will take a major effort.  And, unfortunately, I don’t think we can focus on the up-coming elections.  There isn’t time.

    But there is time to really start organizing for 2012.  This will take massive grass roots organizing, but not around a central saviour like Obama.

    A vast network of P&J groups, labor, equality issue groups amd on and on.  It must be extensive and comprehensive.

    I hope someone will pick this up and go with it.

    I don’t think what you are saying is incompatible with Glen Ford’s suggestions–either way it is a massive movement.

    Thanks for contributing your ideas Edger.

  4. sleeps with the fishes.

  5. from an informed, engaged and energized youth willing to tackle the complex issues of politics, economics, morality etc. But they cannot in this current cultural climate where debt slavery hangs over them. In reality, the natural, physical wealth of the United States is staggering, but it is out of reach by the oppressive common law that considers property worth far more than people.

    There needs to be an authentic, spiritual and intellectual renaissance that rescues idealism from its current,  moribund condition. The word liberal has been horribly condemned and ridiculed over the last 25 yrs, to the point where it takes on a connotation not dissimilar to socialism. Just think what the word idealism would conjure up? Yet, it was an actual movement in England (of all places) in the 19th Century (Moral Idealism)!!

    Currently, we are observing the public school system in the U.S. fracture. Privatizing forces are threatening like a bad storm. Teachers are losing their autonomy (as if they really ever had it), and the curriculum will soon have no room for cultural criticism and debate(at any level). And collective bargaining will soon be all one sided: In other words, scratch out collective.

    Where will our children find the wherewithal for introspection, criticism and constructive diaglogue needed for a healthy, humanistic society?

    I think Jose Ortega Y Gasset was referring to a generation of youth, energy and passion when he observed: “A revolution only lasts 15 years, a period which coincides with the effectiveness of a generation”. This is what Obama was hired to destroy. But yes Edger, I agree that we should help the Democrats self destruct if they are intending to destroy themselves anyhow. Will they be able to see this sentiment while they’re focused on the crystal ball of their private polling data from Ohio and Virginia, two states that seem to keep them up at night.

Comments have been disabled.