Framing a Terrorist for Veteran’s Day

( – promoted by buhdydharma )

Fort Hood is not an end story. Nor is it a beginning. It is the dead middle of a planned story. It is a story about division and fear tactics, patsies and martial law. Its a story about raising the frog’s bathwater incrementally to boil.

That our Muslim citizens are becoming all suspect is no less devious than the beginnings that created our ability to inter the Japanese, or what created Nazism.





Lets move back to April of 2009, when the US Homeland Security Department reclassified Right Wing American Veterans as potential Terrorists. Wow, this incident conveniently creates an atmosphere for keeping surveillance on the only people who might protect us, should a military coup create havoc in our country.

But further back in the way-back machine is the story about Northcom being deployed as of October 2008 on US soil effectively killing Posse Comitatus, for the express reasons of:

“They may be called upon to help with civil unrest and crowd control,” said the Army Times when it first reported on it. These duties would be in addition to dealing with “potentially horrific scenarios such as massive poisoning and chaos in response to a chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or high-yield explosive, or CBRNE, attack.”

Nothing happens in a vacuum, and these taken together weave quite a pattern. The newest incident justifies ever less freedoms for security.

I would refer you to the Brasscheck TV link from a few days ago, reiterating my initial position on the Ft. Hood horror, posted live that night and expounded on Friday past on WWL Radio, but that video is no longer up.

Instead, I will quote the email from the creator of that site:

ONE guy shooting a hand gun killed HOW many people – and on a military

base? Are you serious?

And the one shooter is now in a coma?

And, as of now at least, there’s no surveillance camera footage?

And he’s a Muslim who also happens to be a serviceman with a mental disorder involving gunplay who did it with privately owned weapons?

This thing could not have been scripted or casted better if Hollywood had produced it.

Let’s see:

1. Private gun ownership demonized – check

2. Muslims demonized – check

3. Military personnel demonized – check

4. Base dwelling troops at home terrorized

by a fellow American – check

5. Yet another chance to distract the public – check

If this really happened the way it’s been spun, there have to be a lot of social engineers

high fiving each other at their good luck.

And what about the logic of the gunman?

He was afraid of being deployed to a combat zone…so he created one at home so he could be killed sooner? I realize the man was “crazy” but come on.

(I wonder what prescribed medically-endorsed pharmaceutical substance(s) he was one. We’ll

never know because it would violate his privacy. Score another one for Big Pharma.)

13 killed and 30 wounded by one man with two pistols.

Nearly a 50% kill rate.

Ever fired a handgun? Ever tried aiming and firing two at a time? Under pressure? Ever reload a handgun under pressure? There were people shooting at him. That’s

a little pressure.

We’re talking about yet another superhuman performance by a “lone gunman” who is conveniently not conscious to tell the tale.

Caliber doesn’t matter and the bogus non-fact that these were “automatic”

pistols is bullshit as well.

Meanwhile, we’re being drowned in flags, memorials and interviews with the victims’ families – and a total absence of any information that makes sense.

“But the government would never do such a thing to its own troops!”

Uh, excuse me. It’s putting thousands of them through a meat grinder in a pointless, unwinnable charade of a war as we speak – in two countries, while gearing up for two more (Iran and Pakistan.)

Do you think the dead and wounded from overseas are any less dead and wounded victims from Fort Hood?

Assume the gunman was crazy. What does that make the Bush-Bama regime?

Here’s a news report about another mass shooting by a lone gunman with two pistols that sneaked its way onto the air before it was pulled off and never replayed.

Reality please, just a little reality.

No one asked about friendly fire, either.

The news is now “leaking” all kinds of information claiming that the alleged shooter was radicalizing, and had poor reviews.

The Right is beefing up its “We need to be safe from Muslim Terrorists” right around the Flag-waving celebration of our War Culture that is Veterans Day. Not to insult Veterans of any sort; plenty of well-intended, brave and honorable men and women have served in our armed forces. It is merely that this authors opinion that many of these were lied to, indoctrinated and used as pawns in wars of aggression, wars of hegemony, and wars for profit; justified in the name of “Patriotism.” Patriotism, a word that has become the Manchurian trigger for committing any act whatsoever Globally in order to serve the interests of the vested Elite Class.

Worse? Any one questioning the story is being branded as naive or misguided by many on the Left, who INSIST that this man, should he have committed this impossible act against his own, MUST have been guided by Religious Ideology.

“Muslim Extremism and Terrorists are REAL,” they say, “and I cannot believe Liberals would defend this filthy murderer, because they think the US sucks or something.”

Check: Extremists exist in every religion. Bomb the US back to the Stone Age, destabilize our governments to the point of non-existence, and see what the Clinic Bombers and Palienites create. There would be extremist groups of Christian soldiers killing and torturing in the name of their one true God. Heck, some already do. Look at how the Jewish Religious extremists act in Israel, recently beating a female journalist for daring to use a camera on the Sabbath.

We real Liberals who question this story are not in denial.

We are, however, capable of the logic and reason that tells us this man could not have possibly shot that many people no more than a magic bullet made turns and shot Kennedy from the front of the neck, while making a quick detour through the wrist, then chest of Connelly in the front seat.

We are also painfully aware that the US government is capable of scapegoating patsies and creating evidence to create a bias against a group of people by proxy: Remember the Cuban-commie that was Oswald?

I listened live, and wished I had recorded the TV coverage. When Military Personnel take down a shooter, and confirm kill live, I tend to believe them. When Military Personnel name at least three shooters, I believe their ability to count. When Military Personnel claim to have one dead, and two in custody, and then claim they are still taking sniper fire, I assume that after many deployments, taking live action and gunfire, they are quite capable, if not experts at assessing a situation, in facts are EXPERTS at such assessments.

There were in fact heinous murders at Fort Hood. Tragic, sad murders. Murders more likely caused by a bunch of brave young soldiers put at wits end, victims of PTSD gone untreated that the Army is pushing its medical staff not to diagnose.

“I am under a lot of pressure to not diagnose PTSD” (another anonymous army psychiatrist)

Even was this Nidal Hasan involved, I would think that this fact should at least be given consideration before people jump on the “Evil Islam” bandwagon.

But, even having listened live to the trained soldiers reporting live at Ft Hood, no one dare question the official story, one man, one Muslim, in a coma. A doctor not combat veteran, shoots forty people with 12 bullets and none of the brave, trained combat soldiers could take him down.

There was a great deal more journalism alive in Kennedy’s day, and far more openness to question the “evil commies” than today’s transcribers have to grant a populace increasingly closed to the idea that “Islam” is not inherently evil.

The so-called enemy came from within. So now our own troops will be increasingly suspect, increasingly pressured to denounce any religion but Christianity, and Judaism to a lesser degree. They will be pressured to act as though they have no complaints with the Military, for any criticism nowk, could be used as future condemnation as a traitor.

In the American view, in this the new American Fascist State, intense paranoia serves them well.

In this, the land of increasing desertion, suicides and friendly fire (fragging) incidents, both the Military and our Citizenry just suffered a wake up call.

Be Afraid. Always be afraid. Toe the Line.

This incident was horrific, and my heart bleeds for the dead and wounded, bleeds for their loved ones.

I have no idea who the shooters were, we will never know their mindset or their reasons.

But on this day, I support our Veterans by doing the most Patriotic thing a Citizen can do. I QUESTION.

I question the what the Truth is behind the story, I question the timing as 40k+ more troops are being sent by President Obama to kill Muslims, I question why Hillary is claiming a group of 100 or less is imminent threat.

I question our very reason for these wars.

Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.

The best way to support our troops is to question war itself.

“The President is merely the most important among a large number of public servants. He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and disinterested service to the Nation as a whole. Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right. Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else.”

Theodore Roosevelt

 

32 comments

Skip to comment form

    • Diane G on November 11, 2009 at 23:18
      Author

    anything once its established a suspect is Muslim, or any denomination other than Christian or Jewish.

    Of course, they never ask anything about “official stories” anymore.

    Transcribers never Question.

    • TMC on November 11, 2009 at 23:53

    It is a very distinct possibility that Hasan was also a victim of the same syndrome that he was treating. I posted these two articles a day or two after the incident about the stress on those treating our military personnel for PTSD, the pressures on them and the effects of the constant barrage of stories from the patients.

    Treating trauma victims may cause its own trauma

    Painful Stories Take a Toll on Military Therapists

    Those of us who work in Emergency Medicine in busy ER’s, disaster areas, war zones and refuge camps are well aware of the toll it takes on our own the minds and bodies. It is the reason I am sitting here tonight, a mandatory sabbatical fro at least 6 months and therapy sessions. Maj. Hassan was not only a psychiatrist, he was Muslim and an American born Palestinian who according to some accounts had been harassed about his religion and background. I can only imagine. There is way too much speculation about this man’s state of mind and his motives. Innocent until proven guilty in the press and the “official story”, disgusting.

     BTW. Very good question about “friendly fire”.

    • Edger on November 12, 2009 at 00:37

    In my inbox from UN Wire today:

    The power balance between militant groups operating in Afghanistan has slid, with the Taliban emerging as a more prominent threat than al-Qaida at a time when the Barack Obama administration seeks tens of thousands of more troops to fight the enemy. U.S. estimates hold that some 300 al-Qaida insurgents are holed up in the tribal wilds of Pakistan, while tens of thousands of Taliban agents operate freely on both sides of the Afghanistan-Pakistan border. The inversion might be drawing al-Qaida into the orbit of former Taliban cabinet minister Jalaluddin Haqqani and away from Mohammad Omar, who has distanced himself from al-Qaida in recent months.

    The Washington Post (11/11)

    And this comes from WAPO only a few days hot on the heels of an NYT propaganda piece Greg Palast wrote about…

    Taliban = 9/11?? Afghanistan by Hypnosis

    On September 11, 2001, my office building, the World Trade Center, was attacked by al Qaeda, a murder cult of Saudi Arabians, funded by Saudi Arabians. And so, in response to the Saudis’ attack, America invaded … Afghanistan.

    And here we go again. The New York Times (print edition) headline last Friday was: “Pakistani Army, In Its Campaign In Taliban Stronghold, Finds A Hint Of 9/11.”

    Google it and you’ll find the Times report repeated and amplified 5,785 times more.

    Taliban = 9/11. Taliban = 9/11. Taliban = 9/11.

    Your eyelids are getting heavy. Taliban = 9/11. Taliban = 9/11.

    It’s the latest hit from the same crew that brought you Saddam = 9/11 and its twin chant, Saddam = WMD, Dick Cheney’s chimerical tropes which the New York Times’ Judith Miller happily channeled to the paper’s front page.

    And they’re at it again.

    Escalation in Afghanistan is one thing, but there have also been media scare pieces in the past few days about “security concerns” about Pakistans nuclear weapons.

    I’m starting to wonder if we’re being slowly set up for an invasion of Pakistan. Virtually all of the troops Obama has sent into Afghanistan this year, and any more he sends in the next few days, are going into southern Afghanistan just across a nice flat desert wilderness border from Pakistan….

    • Inky99 on November 12, 2009 at 00:59

    I’ve been studying this whole mess the last few days.

    It stinks.

    Shades of Jessica Lynch, Pat Tillman …..

    One of the best things I’ve found regarding all of this is here:

    http://whitewatch.wordpress.co

    And everybody is conveniently forgetting to talk about this:


    (CNN) – A senior officer who was playing golf Thursday near Fort Hood, Texas, told CNN he witnessed the arrest of one of the two surviving suspects of the shooting at the Army installation.

    Shortly after the shooting, the officer said, military police told him to clear the course and he saw other MPs surround the building that held the golf carts, he said.

    The senior officer said he ducked into a nearby house for cover as 30 to 40 cars carrying MPs approached.

    He said he saw a soldier in battle-dress uniform, his hands in the air. The MPs ordered him to lie on the ground and open his uniform, presumably to ensure he was not carrying explosives, the senior officer said.

    He said an MP told him that authorities considered the man to be a suspect in the shootings after having overheard the man say he was with the shooter.

    The man was surrounded for 25 to 30 minutes, until a convoy of vehicles arrived, led by a Ford Crown Victoria and carrying men in suits, and he was taken away, the senior officer said.

    The golf course is about 2.5 miles from Fort Hood, the officer told CNN.

    Who were the “men in suits?”   I grew up on military bases, and on a military base, the MP’s are the law.   There isn’t anybody else.   There certainly aren’t civilians overseeing stuff ON A BASE as it happens.  They would show up later, probably hours later, or even the next day.

    Don’t forget what else is going on, as far as Psyops being used against the U.S. citizenry.   Last night they killed the D.C. Sniper, a guy whose name was “Muhammed” and they pronounced him dead at “9:11”.

    I am not making this up.

    Why the timing?

    Also, the Ft. Hood thing happened on Guy Fawkes Day, and anyone who has studied false flag CIA blackops stuff knows that the perps have a sick sense of humor.   9/11 was also the anniversary of another CIA coup, and was the anniversary of GHWB’s speech about “the New World order”.   These are not coincidences.

    And the timing, of course, is all about Obama’s “deciding” whether or not to send more troops to Afghanistan, and how many.    The day after the shooting, they leaked he was gonna send 40,000 more to see how it would play.  

    Did you see Monday night football the other night?   Pure “patriotic” spectacle.   A guy parachuted into the stadium trailing an enormous American flag.   A player ran across the field, saluting (caught perfectly in slo-mo and used at the commercials breaks).   Talk about “the troops” and how it was so cool when the commentators visited the troops and how great “the troops” were (if you like them so much, why don’t you get them out of a fucking WAR ZONE you assholes!).

    We’re all being heavily manipulated right now, and it’s just obvious as all hell to anyone who’s been paying attention.

    There’s one Congressman who apparently didn’t get the memo:


    U.S. intelligence agencies were aware months ago that Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan was attempting to make contact with people associated with al Qaeda, two American officials briefed on classified material in the case told ABC News.

    According to the officials, the Army was informed of Hasan’s contact, but it is unclear what, if anything, the Army did in response.

    Rep. Peter Hoekstra (R-MI), the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, said that he requested the CIA and other intelligence agencies brief the committee on what was known, if anything, about Hasan by the U.S. intelligence community, only to be refused.

    In response, Hoekstra issued a document preservation request to four intelligence agencies. The letter, dated November 7th, was sent to directors Dennis Blair (DNI), Robert Mueller (FBI), Lt. Gen Keith Alexander (NSA) and Leon Panetta (CIA).

    Hoekstra said he is “absolutely furious” that the house intel committee has been refused an intelligence briefing by the DNI or CIA on Hasan’s attempt to reach out to al Qaeda, as first reported by ABC News.

    “This is a law enforcement investigation, in which other agencies-not the CIA-have the lead,” CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano said in a response to ABC News. ” Any suggestion that the CIA refused to brief Congress is incorrect.”

    I’m sure he’ll change his tune very soon, as soon as he gets a little “talking to”.

    Then, in a related story, there’s this:

    Scahill: Obama may be afraid of Blackwater.

    Yes, that’s the incredible REAL journalist Jeremy Scahill actually throwing out the possibility, on national TV, that Obama might actually be afraid of Blackwater, the CIA’s very own mercenary team.

    • Inky99 on November 12, 2009 at 01:11

    is actually a real program that the CIA has used for a long time.

    Sirhan Sirhan was quite obviously a victim.  

    And just last night, perusing another forum where we discuss and share info about this sort of things, I found this:

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories


    Like A Duck In A Noose’

    What’s The Significance Of Cryptic Message?

    (CBS)  What does the phrase “caught like a duck in a noose” mean to the sniper?

    Authorities are not revealing the context in which the sniper – if he is indeed the author of notes left for police – asked them to publicly say: “We have caught the sniper like a duck in a noose.”

    Police Chief Charles Moose read that sentence aloud late Wednesday night, as part of his latest message to the sniper, adding: “We understand that hearing us say this is important to you.”

    Until more information is made public, we can’t know what the meaning is of the reference to the duck in the noose.

    There it is, right out in the open.   That’s the programmed code word that the mind control victim has to hear in order to stop what he’s doing and turn himself in.   He just went to sleep at a truck stop, and they had him.

    When I saw this last night, I was astounded.  I guess back then I hadn’t yet studied MKULTRA and all of those things yet.    

    Also there’s the odd coincidence of the head investigator for the Police being named “Moose”.   Kinda rhymes with “Noose”.   How odd.    And he and the shooter were members of the same Oregon National Guard unit earlier in life.  Moose was a hero at the time, but then his star faded very quickly.   Now he’s sorta disappeared into the Reserves and might be in Iraq or Afghanistan or anywhere.

    More on Moose here.  It seems that he wasn’t really the great lead investigator he was painted in the media as being.   In fact, he deliberately told his men to avoid looking for anyone who wasn’t white, even after plenty of eyewitness accounts described the suspects as dark-skinned, possibly African American or Hispanic.

    • Diane G on November 12, 2009 at 02:12
      Author
  1. there is no press

    you are on your own

    can’t save 85% as they won’t wake up under any circumstances

    The wife says the entire staff at the nursing home will never get the flu shot ever again

    the horses are fed and my grandson is a gracious host

    one day at a time.

    • Inky99 on November 12, 2009 at 08:18

    It’s just amazing how the media and the military have turned this story into a very narrow narrative, completely controlled by them.

    For instance, eyewitness accounts that there WAS in fact a second shooting.

    This piece sums it up pretty well:

    http://revisionistreview.blogs


    Interviewer: What would you say is the most striking aspect of the Fort Hood shootings?

    Hoffman: There are so many anomalies, things that just don’t add up, but rather than going into hypotheses that would be difficult for most people to follow, I’ll focus on something glaring, which is — the rush to judgment of Hasan — the total mockery of the ancient right of innocent until proven guilty.

    Interviewer: You mean in naming Major Hasan as the shooter and the only shooter?

    Hoffman: Yes, that’s part of it. Even if he was the gunman, however, even if he was indeed another lone nut, the precedent that’s been set here by the government’s mouthpiece corporate media is dreadful. They report as fact whatever the government chooses to tell them. Notice too that the Glenn Beck anti-government rebels believe the government in this Texas case, just like Beck believes the government narrative in the 9/11 attacks. It’s remarkable, this bipolar suspension of the suspicion of government when it comes to official accounts of shootings, wars and terrorist attacks.

    Interviewer: Anything else?

    Hoffman: In addition to proclaiming Major Hasan guilty until proven innocent, the effect of Fort Hoodwink on the public, as filtered through the media, is to induce in the American people one of the lowest, dumbest, golem-like mentalities of obtuseness.

    Interviewer: That’s insulting to your fellow Americans.

    Hoffman: They insult themselves by their behavior. A friend in California who is one of the few honest attorneys e-mailed me and pointed out that if there were two or more shooters, as eyewitnesses initially reported, then it could be that one or more of them is one of the “victims” mourned by Obama today.

    Interviewer: You’re blaming the victims?

    Hoffman: How do we know they’re all victims? Tell me how we know that every one of the dead in Fort Hood is a victim of Hasan, a mere 100 or so hours after the shooting? Give me a break. Let’s dispense with the boy scout gullibility. Assassination tactics sometimes entail a backup shooter to eliminate the main shooter after the job is done. This was the m.o. when the head of the Columbo crime family was shot in New York in 1971. The assassin himself was immediately shot by a second assassin put in place for that very task.

    Interviewer: Major Hasan may have killed the shooter or shooters responsible for the killings at Fort Hood?

    Hoffman: I don’t know if he did or didn’t, but it’s certainly a possibility given early reports of “eyewitness testimony” of more than one shooter. Consider a plausible scenario: Hasan is told he’s going to stop a mass murder and he’s sent in for that very reason and then after he kills the actual shooter or shooters he’s left holding the bag.

    Interviewer: You think the President may have honored one of the killers at today’s (Nov. 10) memorial service for the victims? You’re saying that one of those mourned as a victim was actually a perpetrator?

    Hoffman: Stranger things have been known to happen. What I do know for certain, as a reporter who investigated crime cases for the Associated Press in New York, is what every cop and detective worth his salt knows, that a crime like this cannot be neatly wrapped up and tied in a ribbon a few days after it was committed. Today’s presidential memorial service in Fort Hood, centering on Obama’s speech, was a way of preempting questions that should be asked but are not being asked. Instead, only approved questions are getting asked.

    And here is the account of the 2nd shooting:

    http://militarytimes.com/news/


    Army spokesman Lt. Col. Nathan Banks said the first shooting began about 1:30 p.m. at a personnel and medical processing office. The facility, called a Soldier Rating and Processing Center, handles administrative details for soldiers.

    Banks said two shooters were apparently involved. There was no immediate word on who they were, nor on identities of the dead.

    Banks said the second incident took place at a theater on the sprawling post.

    Another Army official identified that site as Howze Theater.

    That official, who requested anonymity to discuss an evolving incident, said a graduation had been scheduled for 2 p.m. at the theater.

    • Inky99 on November 12, 2009 at 09:53

    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11


    KILLEEN, Tex. – Sgt. Kimberly D. Munley has been applauded as a hero across the nation for shooting down Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan during the bloody rampage at Fort Hood last week. The account of heroism, given by the authorities, attracted the attention of newspapers, the networks and television talk shows.

    But the story of how the petite police officer and the accused gunman went down in an exchange of gunfire does not agree with the account of an eyewitness who had gone to the base’s processing center, where the shooting occurred, to conduct business before being deployed.

    The witness, who asked not to be identified, said Major Hasan wheeled on Sergeant Munley as she rounded the corner of a building and shot her, putting her on the ground. Then Major Hasan turned his back on her and started putting another magazine into his semiautomatic pistol.

    It was at that moment that Senior Sgt. Mark Todd, a veteran police officer, rounded another corner of the building, found Major Hasan fumbling with his weapon and shot him.

    How the authorities came to issue the original version of the story, which made Sergeant Munley a national hero for several days and obscured Sergeant Todd’s role, remains unclear. (Military officials also said for several hours after the shooting that Major Hasan had been killed, although he had survived.)

    Six days after the deadly shooting rampage at a center where soldiers were preparing for deployment, the military has yet to put out a full account of what happened.

    • Inky99 on November 13, 2009 at 08:50

    of all the fishy stuff, doesn’t even include the new revelation about the official story of the “heroic police woman” being false:

    http://www.sott.net/articles/s

    A lot of good information in this one.

Comments have been disabled.