OBL endorsed Scheuer’s book before Scheuer endorsed OBL’s BOMBS

I am posting this here on Docudharma and NOT on other sites because, frankly, it needs to be pointed out, BUT, I don’t want to get banned.

    Thank the Gods for the reasonable Dharma Bums here.

2007 – Osama bin Laden endorses Michael Schuer’s book

2009 – Micheal Scheuer’s endorses Osama bin Laden’s BOMBS

At :24 seconds into this video

Scheuer:     ” The only chance we have as a country right now is for Osama bin Laden to deploy and detonate a major weapon in the United States. “

Scheuer:    “Because it’s going to take a grassroots, bottom up pressure, because these politicians prize their office, prize the praise of the media and the Europeans. It’s an absurd situation, again. Only Osama can execute an attack that will force Americans to demand a government protect them effectively, consistently and with as much violence as necessary. “

      Seriously? WHAT THE FUCK!!!!!!!

More below the fold, with a bunch more WHAT THE FUCK!!!

      So, Micheal Scheuer, the guy whose old job was catching Osama bin Laden, not only has his book endorsed BY osama bin Laden in a tape addressed to warn Americans of why we are evil and deserve death from above, but Michael Scheuer than returned the favor by endorsing Osama’s BOMBS as “The best thing that could happen” to America.

     Considering the fact that I (and much of my family) live within the fallout radius of NYC, terror target #1, I OFFICIALLY have it OUT for Micheal Scheuer.

     Oh, and the funniest thing Micheal Scheuer has said lately, other than this when he said that Rahm Emaneul would, well, just watch/read it for yourself . . .

Michael Scheuer:     “Oh sure we’re going to be attacked, Brian, and it doesn’t carry, and, you know,  Rahm Emanuel wants an attack. He loves crisis, and crisis, the Democrats, he says, can get all of their programs through. These people simply do not care.

    Yeah, because we know Rahm and the Democrats, not Scheuer’s old bosses Bush/Cheney and the Republicans, would JUST LOVE a terror attack so they can ram through unpopular policies!

    But that wasn’t as funny as this, where Scheuer this Friday basically (possibly) leaks classified material on Fox air to Bill O’Reilly, to which Bill kindly offered that Fox would pay Scheuer’s legal fees IF he did betray American security by leaking classified information on Fox News. (Which I doubt, since Fox is not news anywya)

     In summmation, the guy who was supposed to catch and kill Osama bin Laden has his book endorsed by Osama bin Laden, and then endorses bin Laden’s bombs and says that Democrats, not Republicans, would love to take advantage of a teror attack, and then he tops it off by undermining national security and criticizing the President’s foreign policy which does not include torture, all while possibly leaking classified information.

     Just wow. I mean wow.

     In fact, add to that a hearty WHAT THE FLYING HOLY FUCK!!!!!!!


Skip to comment form

  1. and a serious WTF for Micheal Scheuer and Osama bin Laden

    • Edger on September 22, 2009 at 03:50

    the more and more and more it begins to look like they were all in it together and still are, doesn’t it?

    I mean, what would they do without each other, eh?

    Ron Suskind was on to something more than he knew, I suspect…

    Without a Doubt, October 17, 2004

    “This is why George W. Bush is so clear-eyed about Al Qaeda and the Islamic fundamentalist enemy. He believes you have to kill them all. They can’t be persuaded, that they’re extremists, driven by a dark vision. He understands them, because he’s just like them. . . .”

  2. Who’s there.


    Osama who

    Osama Bin dead for seven years!

    • Inky99 on September 22, 2009 at 07:24

    Scheurer and OBL together at the same time?

    Just asking.

    • hoipoi on September 22, 2009 at 15:33

     I can never get enough of them. You state that this sharing of endorsement needs to be pointed out, but i dont understand what you mean. What book? Is it Imperial Hubris? Schuer,(former CIA), was chief of unit responsible for tracking OBL from 1996-1999. That was when Clinton was president. He attempted to understand why OBL (who btw was a founder of al-Qaida) wanted to hurt us.  Maybe something deeper than “they hate us for our freedoms”.  Maybe US foreing policy had something to do with it.

    Mot, the way you use quotation marks, as in “the best thing that could happen…” makes it seem like Mr Scheuer said this. I dont see that here.  Did he use those exact words?

    Also, imo, Mr Scheuer has more in common with Ron Paul than a man on the FBI’s most wanted list.  

    • hoipoi on September 22, 2009 at 19:49

    What about Ron Paul iyo makes him a crap politician? Why would the fact that he had been on Alex Jones’ radio show make me not want to see him as POTUS?

    How do we stop fucking with the Middle-East and the Far-East?

    Do you see the irony of lamenting our lost freedoms in the same breath as you deride Ron Paul?

    Thank you for responding to my comment.  I look forward to continued dialog.

Comments have been disabled.