Obama = Bush, when it comes to Warrantless Wiretapping

( – promoted by buhdydharma )

From Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF):

Obama Administration Embraces Bush Position on Warrantless Wiretapping and Secrecy

Says Court Must Dismiss Jewel v. NSA to Protect ‘State Secrets’

San Francisco – The Obama administration formally adopted the Bush administration’s position that the courts cannot judge the legality of the National Security Agency’s (NSA’s) warrantless wiretapping program, filing a motion to dismiss Jewel v. NSA late Friday.

n Jewel v. NSA, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) is challenging the agency’s dragnet surveillance of millions of ordinary Americans. The Obama Justice Department claims in its motion that litigation over the wiretapping program would require the government to disclose privileged “state secrets.” These are essentially the same arguments made by the Bush administration three years ago in Hepting v. AT&T, EFF’s lawsuit against one of the telecom giants complicit in the NSA spying.

“President Obama promised the American people a new era of transparency, accountability, and respect for civil liberties,” said EFF Senior Staff Attorney Kevin Bankston. “But with the Obama Justice Department continuing the Bush administration’s cover-up of the National Security Agency’s dragnet surveillance of millions of Americans, and insisting that the much-publicized warrantless wiretapping program is still a ‘secret’ that cannot be reviewed by the courts, it feels like deja vu all over again.”

This issue has particular relevance to me, because back in 2007 I signed on as one of the 33 named plaintiffs in the AL-HARAMAIN case against AT&T, Verizon, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, the NSA et al. that was filed on ‘our’ behalf by the EFF.


In re: National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation

Filing 403



AGAINST BELLSOUTH DEFENDANTS against Bellsouth Communication

Systems, LLC, BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc., BellSouth Communications

Systems, LLC, BellSouth Corp., BellSouth Telecomminications, Inc…

(See Item 126 on page 127).

So to say I am more than a little bit disappointed is, as they say, the understatement of the year. That said, however, am I surprised? Not so much as I thought I would be. Indications, of late, that President Obama has given short shrift to promises of transparency and an end to the War Crimes committed by the previous administration have more than amply demonstrated that “Change we can believe in” is simply that. Not real, actual change, just change we can believe in, if, that is, we wish to continue living in fantasy land.


Skip to comment form

  1. FISA right….. someday.

  2. cross posted at the dailykos.  Heh.

  3. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v

    • BobbyK on April 8, 2009 at 02:36

    look at the factors that are driving Obamas hypocrisy and address those instead/in addition to just saying he is a hypocrite.

    I think the over riding factor is FEAR of being labeled “soft on terror” and losing in 2012.

    You’d think that Obama would have learned through sports. It’s hard to win when you’re afraid to lose. By being afraid to lose, he’s already lost.

    This wiretapping issue is just another example…

    Thank you Lisa for writing about this.

Comments have been disabled.