Obesity Epidemic is Bad News for Economic Recovery

(10 am. – promoted by ek hornbeck)

You think this is harsh and OTT? Dr Donal O’Shea, a famed Irish endocrinologist and Director of the Weight Management Clinic at St Columcille’s Hospital in Loughlinstown, said in a conference in Dublin last week that

“pouring funding into cardiology, cancer and dementia without tackling the obesity epidemic that is fueling these conditions would be a disaster.”

His take on obesity (about 24 minutes long, scroll down to the tenth video) is a sober approach to combating it. “Worldwide, obesity is the driver of a range life-threatening “lifestyles” diseases”, he notes. The British Medical Journal puts it bluntly: “The driving force for the increasing prevalence of obesity in populations is the increasingly obesogenic environment rather than any pathology in individuals”.

If you’re looking for the visible signs of a wide scale system failure all you have to do is walk down the street in any city in the world and see first hand the crisis that is playing out in the bodies of millions of people. It’s a slow moving disaster that has the potential to sink health systems worldwide and seriously hamper economic recovery. For instance here in Ireland, 24% of the population is obese, in line with the rampant epidemic in the US and it is already straining government coffers to the limit. I read the other day in a British magazine, can’t remember which one, but its sheer logic jumped off the page and roughly it is as such:

“In common with all other species, humans instinctively conserve energy, using just as much as we need to feed and breed. Our physiology was simply never designed to cope with having unlimited access to high-energy fats and sugars that today are embedded in the foods that pervades our lives.”

I have written about this in the past and got trolled by some irate posters who trotted out a number of reasons why I shouldn’t point fingers. I’m not. Yes, I get that some people may be overweight due to illness, or suffer from hypothyroidism, pituitary tumor, endocrine abnormalities or other. Weight is often something a person cannot help any more than being female, short, or diabetic. People are often too quick to condemn and judge anyone who is overweight as being lazy and greedy, unable to control their eating. Other factors are transportation or lack of, proximity of convenience stores, cooking time scarcity due to the fact that some people have to hold two or three jobs to make ends meet and a host of others. But obesity is a serious disease which is readily treatable with exercise, a balanced diet and drugs where necessary.

Obesity is the medical term used to describe the state of being overweight to the point where it is harmful to your health. An obese adult is three times more likely to develop diabetes, compared to a person who remains within a healthy weight range. The news is even worse for children and adolescents.

The calorie intake of most people today is broadly the same as 20 years ago, but activity levels have dropped off. The way in which society has changed means that everything is now done for us. We don’t even have to roll down our car windows anymore, we simply press a button. When we enter a building, we rarely have to use stairs because of lifts. While visiting New York I’ve seen a young couple entering a taxicab for a 200 meter ride! And I might add that if obesity is the disease then television is its principal vector. We all know the term “couch potato”.

The nature of food is different today too. Convenience undoubtedly plays a huge role in people’s choice, as indicated by the ever-expanding range of ‘ready meals’ now available, as well as the plethora of fast-food restaurants which continue to pop up nearby.

In dealing with this issue, balance is the key. We need a balanced diet, but the messages we receive about food also need to be balanced. I would like to see food and advertising companies endorsing healthier foods, and to make healthier foods attractive to young people. Take high-fructose corn syrup for example. It’s a cheaply made agricultural byproduct that is ubiquitous in soft drinks and used widely as a sweetener in processed foods. The problem lies with the fact that unlike glucose, which sends a signal to the brain that your stomach is full, calorie-soaked fructose actually leave people feeling hungrier. These products are marketed shamelessly to kids via television shows ad breaks.

When it comes to the issue of obesity and children, ultimately, responsibility lies at home. This message needs to come through school (which should stop selling soft drinks and sugary snacks in their vending machines) as well but it must be delivered at home first and foremost. There needs to be a campaign for parents to make them aware of this issue. Another way to combat this avalanche of fatty products is to tax junk food the same way that governments tax cigarettes and alcohol. The tax revenues could be utilized to promote healthier foods, and make them affordable to all.

According to Dr O’Shea,

“there is much concern over the number of overweight and obese young patients attending not only diabetes clinics, but general medical clinics too. A recent study in the UK found that children as young as three were presenting with obesity. The strain that this puts on the pancreas…it simply would not be able to cope. This is a completely new phenomenon which has only been seen in the last 10 to 15 years”.

The World Health Organisation defines obesity as a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or more. A person’s BMI is calculated based on their weight and height. A person with a BMI of under 25 is considered normal and the risk of developing conditions such as diabetes is minimum. A BMI of 25 – 30 is considered overweight and the risk to health is increased. Calculate you BMI here.

22 comments

Skip to comment form

    • Robyn on November 15, 2008 at 20:57

    Unfortunately, human health deteriorates in times of bad economy.  

  1. you for writing something that is so common a misunderstanding these days. But from what I’ve learned through studying this issue, you have made several factual errors.

    I’ll just give you a couple of examples. First of all, you say this.

    But obesity is a serious disease which is readily treatable with exercise, a balanced diet and drugs where necessary.

    If its so readily treatable, why do none of the treatments seem to work?

    Gina Kolata with the NYT, has done a lot of research on the science of this issue that is so often ignored by the mega-billion dollar diet industry. She answers that question in an article titled Genes Take Charge, and Diets Fall By The Wayside.

    There is also a lot of research showing that there is a correlation between weight and diseases, but not so much about causation. What has been causally linked to these diseases is lack of physical activity and exercise.

    And finally, loads of issues with BMI as any kind of indicator of health.

  2. I was stunned by the differences in diet between German and American food.

    While I facetiously refer to Germany as “Der Fatterland” due to the 50 additional pounds I put on while stationed there, to be honest my own dietary choices and a sedentary lifestyle (not for nothin’ is it called “The Chair Force”) were just as culpable as the very carb-rich German food and beer.

    When I returned to the US what struck me was this nation’s blatant dependency on refined sugar and refined starch. It’s everywhere. The land of stein and schnitzel has nothing on this place for assaulting it’s citizens with a constant stream of raw sugar and fried starch.

    It’s worst in the inner city, where the cheapest food is often the worst for one’s health.

    Of COURSE it’s on purpose. We wouldn’t want the health care INDUSTRY to suffer or anything, now would we?

    The way this nation has treated artificial sweeteners says a lot about how corporate America is getting away with quite literally POISONING it’s citizenry through ignorance and greed. Aspartame’s health issues are slowly becoming more well known, and the reason it made it through the FDA at all was directly due to Donald Rumsfeld. However I’m appalled at how many people in this country still don’t know about the dangers of Equal/aspartame, which is still provided in quantity as packets that people are encouraged to put into their hot beverages. I was utterly shocked to find a large amount of it in the CodePink house in DC, and after explaining it’s dangers to the women there I was given the ok to throw it away. When heated, Aspartame breaks down into formaldehyde and METHANOL – wood alcohol. Long term effects of the ingestion of aspartame can include nerve damage, brain damage, blindness – all the yummy goodness that results from ingesting methanol.

    Splenda is not much better as no one is entirely sure what chlorinated sugar will do to the human body yet. Several doctors have linked Splenda to assorted toxic chemicals such as DDT which have been used as insecticides. There has been minimal testing of Splenda and yet the stuff is all over the market. Splenda is also padded with other refined sugars to make it’s volume and texture closer in appearance to real sugar, and then they have the nerve to claim that it’s a sugar-free solution.

    Meanwhile, the Coca Cola company has been given a virtual monopoly on the supermarket distribution of it’s stevia based sweetener, Truvia. No other stevia-based product in this country is allowed to be sold as anything other than a “dietary supplement”, and supermarkets are not permitted to sell it. I tried Truvia this month and quite frankly I am not feeling as well as I was when I was using the other two forms of stevia that were available to me over the summer – an extract and the powdered leaf itself. I will not be purchasing Truvia again.

    I have lost 20 of those 50 pounds over the last two years with steady exercise and the elimination of refined sugar and high carb starch from my diet. Sugar is the key, folks. Sugar. Get educated on that subject and spread the word.

  3. Can anyone make a case for the Federal government having a role in the body weight of Americans?

    I’ll stipulate (although I’m not truly persuaded) that the obesity epidemic is a real health issue, but I still see absolutely no legal justification that permits the Federal government a role in guiding the eating choices of Americans.  Beyond eliminating subsidies for corn and tariffs for sugar, I see no possible role for the Federal government.

Comments have been disabled.