Friday Night at 8: Caring from the Heart

I just finished reading a remarkable book, Heart Like Water by Joshua Clark, a memoir of his time spent in the French Quarter during and after Hurricane Katrina.

Josh experienced the storm, the days afterward with no electricity, finding other Quarter residents in various bars that stayed open the whole time, scrounging for food, exploring, dodging cops and soldiers who were driving around trying to enforce the evacuation.

He didn’t know as much as the rest of the nation what all too many folks were going through, at the Super Dome, the Convention Center, the 9th Ward, Plaquemines Parish — it wasn’t until later that he explored the Gulf Coast (including Mississippi), still dodging cops and soldiers, and saw the devastation.

And he wrote about it, in a wild stream of consciousness that sears the heart.

At the end of the book, Josh writes about apprehending the suffering of others.  He has been wandering the region, talking to people, hearing their stories.  But he senses something is missing:

… I look at the viscera of this place, the gray of predawn mixing with the gray of what was once a neighborhood to make everything once again like some dim reflection of a dream, and I want so badly to care, to ache, not from the head like we all do, but from the heart.  But I just can’t, no mater how hard I try, not now.

This is not an essay about New Orleans or Katrina.  It’s about human suffering and how we deal with it.

In our society, too often folks who suffer misfortune are shunned in one way or the other by the rest of us.

We may very well be kind people who wish to help, but often the sheer magnitude of human suffering we encounter makes us retreat from truly caring from the heart, from reaching out and connecting with those who are suffering when we are perhaps in better circumstances than they.

Well, Billie says it best:

Money, you got lots of friends

crowding round the door

When you’re gone and spending ends

They don’t come ’round no more

I’m not talking here about donning sackcloth and ashes and wailing and devoting one’s life to those who suffer.  Simple recognition, human witnessing, is difficult enough, I think.

We see politically how this plays out.  The Republican noise machine has called out the Welfare Queen as well as the undocumented worker to scare middle class folks into thinking their share of the pie will be cut smaller by people who don’t deserve help at all.  We see rich people being held to different moral standards, we see class warfare.

It’s easy to play on the fears of people, to make them turn against those who suffer with the subtle threat that they will be next if they try to really help.

And now, in our times, we are seeing suffering on a planetary scale.  Through our own advanced technology, we can know what is going on around the world, and it is not a happy sight.

And because we see this suffering so many steps removed, on TV screens or computer monitors, we can feel so overwhelmed that we never get around to caring from the heart and not the head.

I wrote last week about the challenge of staying human in these crazy times.

Caring from the heart is part of meeting that challenge.

We’ve been bamboozled far too long by powers that be who try to make us think we can’t do anything about this suffering, who are masters of rationalization and spin and who then confirm our own disconnect to our fellow human beings.  This diminishes us, makes us more isolated and cut off from our own humanity.

Why did Josh want to feel others’ suffering?  Why did he want to “ache?”  What was the motive driving him to this and why was it painful for him not to be able to feel what he wanted to feel?

When we connect with others, and I’m not talking about acts of charity or anything like that (which is not to say I don’t think that’s important), but just a real awareness of the fact others are suffering, we are the ones who gain something.  It may be painful to see that we are in a position of privilege and that privilege is paid for by the pains and hungers of other human beings, but I think it is far more painful in the long run to deny this reality and turn away with rationalizations, to care only from the head.

Because when we care from the heart, it transforms us.  We recognize folks who suffer as human beings just like us, we drop our pretensions that we are somehow exempt from, at the very least, witnessing this suffering.

One million Iraqis dead.  We can remember them, we can care from the heart.

Over 1,500 dead from the Federal Flood.  We can remember them, we can care from the heart.

The Sudan.

Burma.

Tibet.

All around the world.

No matter how much the powers that be try to tell us compassion is a limited resource, we know better, that there is no limit to the capacity of the human heart.

And when we connect in this way, we are better able to act as a brother or sister than some sort of removed observer, feeling guilt or blame, selfish sadness over our own inability to save the world which we then blame on those who are suffering, or shame that we can’t do more and so we do nothing at all.

When we connect, when we care from the heart, no one is a stranger, from the homeless man on the streets of Manhattan to the Iraqi refugee just trying to find a resting place.

This is not an easy thing to do.   Right-wing politicians and citizens love to hurl the phrase “bleeding heart liberal” at this reality like an incantation they believe will destroy what we all know is true.

They do this so they can continue to hide behind their shells of inhumanity, cut off from the very source of what makes us human, a hidden, shrieking part of themselves knowing just the same that this act has nothing at all to do with politics, even as those who master this ability often find themselves in the political arena in one way or the other.

All it takes is effort, awareness, and courage.

If we are to remain human beings during these crazy times, caring from the heart for those who suffer is an essential act and one worth taking the time to explore, to see for ourselves that this caring heart is already within us, full and complete, right there for the discovery.

68 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. … if you dig Billie’s suffering, from the heart …

    Then you dig Billie better.

    As the hip kids would say …

    Happy Friday to one and all!

    • Robyn on May 3, 2008 at 02:14

    • Alma on May 3, 2008 at 02:21

    Another grand slam.

    We may very well be kind people who wish to help, but often the sheer magnitude of human suffering we encounter makes us retreat from truly caring from the heart, from reaching out and connecting with those who are suffering when we are perhaps in better circumstances than they.

    I think its more a feeling of being overwhelmed and not knowing where to start, and what to do, what can be done.  There’s just so much needless suffering, pain, violence, hunger, hate, etc.  I feel connected, but so much a failure of being real, tangible, help for others.

    • kj on May 3, 2008 at 02:35

    and could that (a rec button) come standard?  ðŸ™‚

  2. The first follows what Alma described above. I feel so overwhelmed that I feel powerless. Then I feel defeated and don’t have a heart to give.

    The second is when I give, but not with my heart. I wrote an essay about the book Lest Innocent Blood Be Shed a few months ago titled An Open Door. The reason that book meant so much to me is a passage where author Philip Hallie describes Andre Trocme, the subject of the book, this way:

    But he did not give it (this celebration of life) to Le Chambon in the way that one gives money to the poor or gifts to friends. Trocme gave his aggressive ethic to them by giving them himself. Aside from the distinction between good and evil, between helping and hurting, the fundamental distinction of that ethic is between giving things and giving oneself. When you give somebody a thing without giving yourself, you degrade both parties by making the receiver utterly passive and by making yourself a benefactor standing there to receive thanks – and even sometimes obedience – as repayment. But when you give yourself, nobody is degraded – in fact, both parties are elevated by a shared joy. When you give yourself, the things you are giving become, to use Trocme’s word, feconde (fertile, fruitful). What you give creates new, vigorous life, instead of arrogance on the one hand and passivity on the other.

    I’m not so sure why we make it so hard to do this.  

    • kj on May 3, 2008 at 02:47

    am sort of blown away by the synchronicity in Robyn’s essay and this.  where am i on Friday nights?  right here.  attempting to decipher both of you individually and then what you’ve said collectively.

  3. in English…but it’s one of the saddest songs I know:

    Mon coeur qui parle…

    • kj on May 3, 2008 at 03:01

    are where i work out a lot of stuff. (yes, ‘working things out’ with several tons of metal under my feet, scary, eh? 😉

    a headline or a picture will get inside me and burn. so i’ll hold imaginary conversations in my head with a couple of people i know (family) who are already familiar with both my temper and my pov. in my head, i let loose… really let the anger fly. all the while realizing that i’m burning a track of anger in my brain and heart that isn’t healthy, and what i’m doing is a luxury and dangerous and there is only a limited amount of time i’m going to allow the train of thought. and i understand that i’m blaming them for supporting this administration and for not living up to the standards i think they ‘should’ be living up to. and that by blaming them i’m blaming myself for my own powerlessless. i know what i’m doing isn’t prescribed as healthy in any journal.

    but… that’s my steam valve. that’s what i do when the despair threatens to overwhelm me, or numb me past anger. don’t know that i’ve ever admitted it before.

    sort of what Rusty does when he lets loose with one of his sentences… only Rusty is creative and i’m just pissy!  

  4. This is a delicious essay and discussion. Ripe and luscious with life, caring, and the human quandary.  My heart is moved.

    My head is also responding.  There are a ton of different thoughts I have had, I’m not sure which ones will come out. I have considered these matters a lot.  Here are some more or less random responses.  But first, NpK, I have the sense that there is something very specific you are saying, and I admit I’m still not zeroed in on it.  Please continue to talk about it, and I apologize if I’m not reacting directly to your central theme here.

    Here is one of my personal truths that came to me long ago.  I have cherished the liberation it brings.  Many of us are acutely aware of suffering elsewhere in the world, some of it caused by our government or shadow elements in our government.  I have known many people who didn’t feel a right to be happy while others suffered.  If one feels connected to another, not by a kind of rope or chord, or by a shared humanity, but by actually being the same, then questions of guilt or shame have no meaning.  Their suffering is our suffering.  And also, our joy is their joy.  So, I believe that my obligation to a detainee in Guantanamo is to feel joy when joy comes to me.  How depressing would it be to think that, even if he were freed, the detainee would still not feel joy, either because there would always be others suffering, or because humans had lost the ability to feel joy.  Experiencing deep joy or happiness is a gift to the entire world, and most especially to those who are suffering.

    Also, you make me think of the eastern notion that the only “sin,” is to believe in separation.  This delusion is the source of all suffering.  I believe torture exists primarily because confused people are desperately attempting to refute their deepest knowing by proving repeatedly to themselves that the suffering of those they torture is not their own suffering.  Heartbreakingly for both parties, no one will escape such confused behavior without terrible suffering.

    Finally, a great gift to me from my therapist.  A couple of times I have been with her and gotten in touch with deep heartbreak–heartbreak that felt unbearable.  At such times, she has said to me the heart has an infinite capacity for being broken.  She has guided me in attempts to walk through the world with an open, broken heart.  And that’s not a morbid or negative thing–it’s an alive human thing.

    Okay, really finally this time, and I hope I’m not getting too weird here.  The last one reminded me of a story I was told by a disciple of a yogi.  As a young man, he had been around the yogi’s teacher, a man beloved by many.  He said the teacher, Bapuji, was practiced such that he could spend hours with his awareness in his seventh chakra–the crown chakra of oneness with being.  When people around him would clamor for the yogi’s attention, he would, with effort, bring his awareness down to his heart chakra so as to be able to connect with them.  What was surprising to hear was that this was a very painful experience for Bapuji.  His face would go from blissful to heartbroken and he would often sob.  This definitely conflicted with my naive picturing of how wonderful it would be to walk around in the soft, loving heart awareness all the time.  Life is suffering, which is really to say unsatisfactory, filled with longing.

  5. tonight to illustrate the fallacy of both political parties in regards to New Orleans.  Ask anyone who knows what New World Order means and they will tell you the government response to a disaster consisted of sending in Blackwater troops to confiscate guns.  It meant refusing food from England but most of all it meant the creamtion of care.  You know the internet has a website for everything.

    http://www.cremationofcare.com

Comments have been disabled.