Fight For Your Right…. To Orgasm

( – promoted by buhdydharma )

I caught this little ditty over at the Broadsheet section at Salon.

An Ecuadorian politician recently set off a monsoon of machismo by reportedly attempting to write a woman’s right to sexual satisfaction into the state’s constitution. Maria Soledad Vela’s pro-pleasure argument was called “ridiculous” and an attempt to “decree orgasm by law” by male lawmakers. They obviously don’t understand how amazing an orgasm is when it is supported by fantastic porn, similar to what they’d find at websites such as twinkmovies.xxx. A local newspaper spoke with a man who actually likened the legislation to “life in prison.” (Surely, he’s a bunch of fun in bed.) But, all she’s asking for is required public health education that acknowledges women aren’t unfeeling breeding machines. (¡Qué horrible!) Soledad Vela says she isn’t demanding the right to an orgasm, but, as the BBC puts it, “merely the right to enjoy sex in a free, fair and more open society” — and if that means greater orgasms, which it probably does, then so be it.

In conservative Ecuador, that’s a dangerous political platform; and that’s why, even though I realize it’s only Monday, I’m nominating Maria Soledad Vela as Broadsheet’s woman of the week

My question: why don’t American politicians ever have the innovative ideas any more?

I double dog dare a leading politician here in the land of the free to propose that kind of amendment.

Meanwhile…. Joan Walsh gives an eye rolling summary of a soon to appear Michael Wolff piece in Vanity Fair. You can read it here.

Wolff is a guy and as we already know men are the authority on sex, and many who are in a similar situation may decide to promote their dominance further by watching videos on sites like https://www.xxxvideor.com/. Whilst this might not be for everyone, more people than we know decide to do it, maybe even Wolff. With that being said though, I am so grateful that he sprayed his wisdom around with analysis like this:

The Hillary story is-and how could it not be?-largely a sexual one. This is not so much a sexist view as a sexualist view: What’s up here? What’s the unsaid saying? What’s the vibe? Although it’s not discussed in reputable commentary, it’s discussed by everyone else: so what exactly is the thing with Hillary and sex, with the consensus being that she simply must not have it (at least not with her husband; there are, on the other hand, the various conspiracy scenarios of whom else she might have had it with). It’s partly around this consensus view of her not having sex that people support her or resist her. She’s the special-interest candidate of older women-the post-sexual set. She’s resisted by others (including older women who don’t see themselves as part of the post-sexual set) who see her as either frigid or sexually shunned-they turn from her inhibitions and her pain

Sure, it is an insulting masquerade of journalism that Wolff is punting. Older women don’t have sex. Nobody wants to have sex with women of a certain age. And apparently I once again find myself shunted aside from the cultural mainstream because, I actually haven’t spent much time thinking about HRC’s sex life. Does that put me in the post sexual set? I think about sex. I watch sex on various websites like hdpornmovies xxx and a few others. I have sex. And I even know over 40 women who have sex. The men who have sex with them don’t seem to be complaining much about it either.

Inevitably when I hear men discussing the lack of hotness women have, or men dissecting the failing looks of women in general or a specific woman, I am struck by hilarity. Why?

Now I have nothing against balding overweight men ( I count many among friends and bedded a few ) but it is usually the men who look profoundly ordinary themselves who are the most eager to trample on a girl’s looks. Now, if you like small girls you’ll like petite porn too and that’s ok, but don’t bash anyone else just because it doesn’t fit into your fetish!

I am not an HRC fan, but future aspiring female presidents would be wise to study the torrent of misogynist “wisdom” passed around about her, the attacks on looks, clothes, elasticity of skin, etc. Because it isn’t just about HRC. She is a girl and she is daring to try and take a boy job, and that is what a woman will face when she dares to do it.

There are just an awful lot of men, who quite apart from being sexist just do not like women , what they like, and what they desire are female body parts. They want to touch, play with and possess them for pleasure, their own pleasure. No doubt American politicians would react the exact same why as the Ecuadorian ones did when faced with so called demands for female orgasms which are clearly metaphors for political rights. Imagine the horror if HRC mentioned the word orgasm. Nobody wants HRC to have an orgasm or a boy job. Never mind that women who have orgasms tend on average to be significantly less pissed off than women who don’t regardless of how they obtained it.

It doesn’t matter whether it is orgasms, political office, reproductive rights, children’s rights and safety, when women fight for something, often fighting for things they already have and hoping not to lose it, they will be reviled for it by some segment of the male population. If their ideas can’t be attacked ( because they are essentially sensible ) then expect an assault on looks, on sexuality or lack of. if a woman is very attractive and seeking a position of power, there will be an attempt to question her competence. If a woman is merely ordinary in looks, quite frankly the vast majority of us, then there will be snide asides about how she is seeking power because she couldn’t land the man she really wanted.

I am not suggesting this is and always will be the fate of women who wish to challenge the various power structures. It is however, the fate of women who wish to challenge power structures in societies where fear of women is a an overt or underlying cultural norm .

We’ve come a long way baby, but the road ahead is long. And it doesn’t matter if we are straight, gay, transgendered, or women of color. I am not suggesting those qualities don’t matter, they do. But they often don’t matter to men who fear us. And working class women who try to articulate their struggles and challenge class barriers will be facing fears about revolutionary angst. We simply cannot have the servants running the show can we? At least HRC is from the respectable upper classes.

And there are plenty of valid reasons why many of us oppose her candidacy. There are plenty of valid reasons to oppose any woman’s candidacy. Unfortunately, we rarely hear them in popular discussions because in the end what some, not all men want, is a combination porn star/mommy to make them feel good about themselves and when women fail to carry out this critical role, they are attacked and rejected as deficient no matter what office they run for or what position they seek.

75 comments

Skip to comment form

    • OPOL on May 6, 2008 at 5:02 pm

    their age only enhances their most extraordinary qualities.  I have at least two examples in mind…and I know where of I speak.  

    *I am an equal opportunity pro-orgasm ultra-liberal – and I approve this message.  😛

  1. Only when a candidate is a woman do the media come up with gossip-column fluff about sex and appearance. I am not a HRC supporter, but I suspect that much of the opposition to her candidacy is the result of sexism.

    And good for Ecuador. As the world moves toward greater democracy, we in the U.S. will be taught a thing or two about the word really means.

    Women in Black

  2. …is priceless.

    This sincerely, totally rocked.  Off to work…

    • brobin on May 6, 2008 at 6:05 pm

    Shake(it)spear

    I make others cum, therefore I am in demand.

    Knowledgeable human

    • geomoo on May 6, 2008 at 6:09 pm

    The radical muslim, the unfuckable ball-buster, or the maverick straight-talkin’ war hero.  Tough choice.

    The level of discourse is a sad reflection on the country, but I’m glad you’re naming it so clearly.

    • Robyn on May 6, 2008 at 6:40 pm

    And I even know over 40 women who have sex. The men who have sex with them don’t seem to be complaining much about it either.

  3. cannot I find a text of what Maria Soledad Vela is proposing?

    Enough media bs about what she’s “promoting”.  Can we see the text of the measure that we’re reading the opinions about?  I guess not.  15 minutes googling in Ingles y Espanol, y no tengo nada.  C’mon people I wanna see it!  We can translate it, and see if we can find a Congressperson to introduce it in the US (provided we like the way it reads).

    Can we have fun in bed Congress with this?

  4. on some clip from the campaigning I heard some union leader for Hillary announce that she had three testicles! As you all know I am a well known Hillary basher, but the look on Clinton’s face made me realize what this woman was putting herself through gender wise. First she looked alarmed and then came the pained wince. Was he saying don’t worry guys she’s one of us, therefore no threat to our penis’s or aggressive chest thumping?

    Our culture’s (marketing) view of woman’s sexuality seems stuck in pubescent wet dreams of bodies which are only there to satisfy the male without having to engage in any physical conversation other then their need to validate their prowess , and egos without engaging in dance. Orgasm’s for everyone would be a platform I would endorse.

    As for post sexual, since this segment of men never really discovered that sexual joy is a journey that brings more satisfaction and fullfilment the more it is practiced. Sad cause they are missing the whole point. One of the few things in life where giving and receiving is a perfect fit. A gift of joy where yin and yang complete.            

     

    • 3card on May 6, 2008 at 10:12 pm

    Is it any wonder we’re afraid of women…especially when the subject of orgasms comes up.   And it does come up, doesn’t it. Over and over and over again.  It just ain’t fair.  I mean women are just so much better at orgasms than we are.  Not so much the giving of orgasms (most of us are trainable) but the having.  The sheer variety is intimidating enough in single doses, but multiples!.., and sustained plateaus! It’s just nuts!  They’re even better at faking orgasms.  

    And if that weren’t enough they hit max libido when they’re old enough and experienced enough to know what they’re doing and we’re on the long downhill slide.  How unfair is that?

    Then in their audacious cruelty they talk about orgasms. And they’re better at that too, both with each other and in mixed company.  They actually seem to enjoy it. The really terrifying ones actually expect us to talk about them too!  In the entire history of this country and culture NEVER has the subject of orgasms come up in casual conversation between guys.  Any self respecting ‘merican male would rather be waterboarded than talk about orgasms.

    And what’s the tradeoff?  What are men better at than women?  Lifting heavy stuff, throwing overhand, opening jars and writing our names in the snow.  And theres only one of those that they won’t can’t argue with.  

     

  5. and had a comment in mind….waited, trying not to jump your tip jar…and then ran out of time and had to leave…

    now, all of my wondrous insights have already been expressed 😉

    great essay, ucc…

  6. Holistic sex ed

    Hopefully the next woman who runs for Pres can run without having to ‘man up’ (be hawkish)…….or does Hil really want to ‘obliterate’ people?

  7. realm, I am having a hard time shaking my newest admirer: the goat across the street.

    If I play with the dogs outside he runs over to see if he can join in and whips the pups into a frenzy. He chases my car down the street. Like some men, he isn’t good at articulating his deepest feelings so I don’t know if it is me he likes, my tasty lawn, or the dogs.

  8. i don’t take it personally. they don’t like other men, dogs, or cats either. they are the objectifiers…

    maybe the view and understanding of it gets too complicated. it’s about values. and not about their values. but ours.

    mostly, we have let them run roughshod over the planet.

    btw… they count plenty of women among their numbers.

    hey ucc… great to see you back and on the list!!!

     

    • RiaD on May 7, 2008 at 3:39 am

    the perfect man….

  9. but I suppose we should first start with the right for healthcare for all citizens of this country.

    Us ladies would be a lot more fun and happy if we had both 🙂

Comments have been disabled.