Why Bush Defends Secret Torture Techniques

(10 am – promoted by ek hornbeck)

“Alternative procedures.” “Valuable tools in the war on terror.” “Specialized interrogation procedures.” “Safe and lawful techniques.” “Good policies.”

George W. Bush has more euphemisms for torture than his creepy Veep, Cheney, has expletives on supply.

On Saturday, in his weekly radio address, President Bush announced his veto of the Congressional Intelligence bill, which included a ban on CIA use of certain “enhanced” interrogation methods, like waterboarding. Bush defended the use of the so-called “alternative procedures” practiced by the CIA, as necessary for field intelligence officers interrogating “hardened terrorists.” The play upon the fear of Americans of terrorist attack in the aftermath of the horrific 9/11 events turns upon well-understood traumatic mechanisms in the human psyche.

But I want to concentrate on one telling aspect of Bush’s torture apologia. Regarding the attempt by Congress to limit the intelligence agencies to interrogation practices based upon the Army Field Manual (which forbids use of hooding, waterboarding, sexual humiliation, etc.), Bush said (emphasis added):

Limiting the C.I.A.’s interrogation methods to those in the Army field manual would be dangerous because the manual is publicly available and easily accessible on the Internet. Shortly after 9/11, we learned that key Al Qaida operatives had been trained to resist the methods outlined in the manual. And this is why we created alternative procedures to question the most dangerous Al Qaida operatives, particularly those who might have knowledge of attacks planned on our homeland. The best source of information about terrorist attacks is the terrorists themselves. If we were to shut down this program and restrict the C.I.A. to methods in the field manual, we could lose vital information from senior Al Qaida terrorists, and that could cost American lives.

While Bush touts various terrorist operations foiled by use of torture, a major Congressional player had a different view:

Sen. Jay Rockefeller, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said he had heard nothing to suggest that the CIA, through enhanced interrogation methods, had obtained information to thwart a terrorist attack.

Secrets, Secrets, Secrets… Shhh!

The secret “enhanced” CIA interrogation techniques were authorized by Bush in July 2006, in a secret Executive Order vetted by Steven Bradbury and the Office of Legal Counsel. This authorization was needed after a 2006 Supreme Court decision had determined that Al Qaida prisoners were subject to the Geneva Conventions. Even earlier secret recommendations — most famously, then-new Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’s February 2005 memorandum recommending government torture, which only came to light last year — demonstrated the tenacity of the Bush Administration’s quest to give the CIA and possibly other intelligence agencies the green light for torture.

In his radio address, Bush claims that if the terrorists had access to government interrogation methods, they would be able to prepare themselves to withstand the torture. Indeed, this is the rationale for the 50-year-old military SERE program. SERE stands for Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape, and each branch of the military conducts its own version of it. It was SERE military psychologists, Bruce Jessen and James Mitchell, who were accused by a Pentagon Office of Inspector General Report last year of reverse-engineering SERE training into torture instruction to U.S. military/CIA forces abroad. (Katherine Eban at Vanity Fair also wrote a great article on this matter last summer.)

So I suppose this is what Bush is referring to when he says that the government had to create “alternative procedures” to counter the presumed wiliness of the “hardened terrorists.” Except this is a lie. As regular readers of my blog know, government torture has been well-researched for over 50 years. It also went operational around the same time. The not-unsavvy terrorists certainly know where to go on the Internet to read the CIA’s KUBARK Counter-intelligence Interrogation Manual, declassified by the United States in the 1990s, or any of a number of books openly for sale that describe the same.

The KUBARK manual describes the use of fear, isolation, sensory deprivation, temperature extremes, sleep deprivation, fear, and other techniques to induce regression and dependency in prisoners, in order to make them malleable to an experienced interrogator. SERE techniques were derived from presumed extreme sorts of torture that could be encountered by U.S. servicemen who found themselves prisoners of a government or group who didn’t follow the Geneva Conventions. How ironic that the most famous state to announce it wouldn’t follow Geneva protocols would be… the United States!

Bush does have a point. Knowledge of torture techniques and counter-measures can help a prisoner subjected to torture or cruel treatment, up to a point. Personality factors play a much larger role, as the KUBARK manual points out (including a CIA bibliography on the subject). Besides, there a multitude of sources available for the enemy government or sophisticated organization to gather such information. The Congressional bill does not discuss torture counter-measures, to my knowledge.

The government — and Bush is following advice from the CIA — wants to keep its torture techniques secret because when a detainee does not know what’s coming, it increases anxiety and fear, which creates greater confusion and psychological regression. In the spook biz, they call this extending the “shock of capture.”

And then there is the political raison d’etre: Bush doesn’t want the general public to know what barbarities are practiced in their name. Unfortunately, there are still too many Americans willing to play ostrich and pretend they don’t know what’s going on, ducking behind Bush and his surrogates’s platitudes and lying homilies. Meanwhile, Bush’s congressional critics (mostly Democrats) portray the Army Field Manual as providing a “bright line” between torture and acceptable interrogation technique.

Except this isn’t true, either. The Army Field Manual’s Appendix M allows selective use of CIA KUBARK-style torture, including use of isolation (also used at Guantanamo today), sleep deprivation, “harsh” induction of fear and play upon a detainees phobias, and the use of sensory deprivation goggles and gloves — and this despite the fact the AFM in its main text says it forbids use of sensory deprivation. (The NY Times article and others on AFM often mention the use of isolation, wrongly reporting it as limited to 30 days, and not mentioning at all the use of sleep deprivation, sensory deprivation goggles, and “fear up harsh” techniques.)

The Torture Issue Won’t End When Bush Is Gone

Spywork is famously presented as a house of mirrors, a wasteland of lies and deceptions. Bush’s radio address/veto continues this grand tradition of obfuscation and doublespeak. And it’s clear where the lame duck president gets his marching orders. From today’s New York Times:

In a memo to CIA employees Saturday, CIA Director Michael Hayden said the Army Field Manual does not “exhaust the universe” of lawful interrogation techniques. “”There are methods in the CIA’s program that have been briefed to our oversight committees, are fully consistent with the Geneva Convention and current U.S. law and are most certainly not torture,” Hayden wrote.

We are very, very far from cleaning up this mess. In the choice between secret CIA torture and its somewhat cleaned up Army Field Manual version, there’s very little to make a human rights advocate very happy. The Democratic candidates have made some stir that they would change things, stop the torture, and from Obama, the secret renditions, too; restore habeas corpus, etc. But they aren’t exactly out front on the issue, and seem susceptible to military influence, and threats they are “too soft” on “terrorism.”

Torture is a hydra-headed beast. It exists around the world, and the U.S. is hardly alone, even among Western so-called democracies, in practicing the barbaric “question.” It will take a mass movement, something akin to the abolition of slavery or women’s rights movements of the 19th century to change this fundamental evil in human society. For now, we must fight as we can, and try to undo the deadly combination of militarism, self-satisfied careerism, greed and bloodlust that has characterized the Bush torture regime.

One could do worse than to follow right now this hyperlink to Physicians for Human Rights website page on fighting torture. A long journey must begin with some first step.

Also posted at Invictus, American Torture, and Daily Kos

10 comments

Skip to comment form

    • Valtin on March 10, 2008 at 5:47 am
      Author

    Not because subject matter was especially complex for me, but I think because the psychic weight of the topic was burdening me. Arms felt heavy, mind foggy. And I haven’t even had my evening cocktail yet!

    It’s amazing how the entire population is being worn down by the ever-advancing monstrosity of what our government is and does.

    {Sigh}

    • pfiore8 on March 10, 2008 at 6:25 am

    why. why. why. why. why. why. fucking why…

    he’s not defending torture. he’s barely trying to justify it. he’s declaratory. it’s done. de facto. there’s no defending at all.

    it just is. and i’m sure he’d tell you to get over it. like, just go out and spend your tax rebate. okay?

    and i have a question about that tax rebate. it just hit me. do you suppose the work to post the letters informing us about the tax rebate have been outsourced so that some other BushCo crony can cash in on the $41M it’s gonna take to mail these suckers.

    sorry for the OT thing… but this is making us all insane i think…

  1. BushCo’s appeal to sources and methods is just smokescreen designed to hide the real reasons it tortures:

    1. Intimidation.

    Any authoritarian regime worth its salt need its gulags – not simply as a place to send dissidents but, more importantly, to intimidate the rest of populace from speaking and/or acting against it.

    Looked at this way, all the publicity surrounding Abu Graihb, Gitmo, rendition flights, etc. actually works in BushCo’s favor, because it reinforces the shadowy threat that anyone can be carted off at the whim of the regime.

    So far from Bush’s professed claim that he wnats to keep interrogation sources and methods a secret, BushCo is more than happy to have people talking about what barbarians they are, because it helps perpetuate an aura of intimidation that keeps the rabble in line.

    Don’t believe me? Think about all the graphic torture photos we’ve been shown, and then ask why the Bushies don’t try harder to stop their release.  Or to put it another way: Why are pics of US military coffins harder to find than torture pics?

    2. Sadism



    As I said on a previous thread, these guys just get off on this stuff, and I wouldn’t be surprised at all if Saturday Night Torture Porn was a regular feature at the White House movie theater.

    • plf515 on March 10, 2008 at 12:11 pm

    that sums up torture, but, then, that sums up the whole Bush administration

    • Temmoku on March 10, 2008 at 4:01 pm

     from Guantanamo and the Abu Ghraib photos with glee.

    Everything about him suggests sexual repression and sexual hangups from the way he walks and talks to his desire to make War and conduct torture. He has severe sexual hangups and he has been our President!

    We have been so betrayed.

Comments have been disabled.