One Flight Down

Many of you might have already seen the video by Annie Leonard titled The Story of Stuff. If not, I highly recommend it (you can watch the whole thing at the link). She walks us through the extraction, production, distribution, consumption and disposal of stuff and what its doing to our world in a way that is both informative and engaging. But I’d like to focus on the stage of consumption.

The quote from Victor Lebow really grabbed me:

Our enormously productive economy…demands that we make consumption our way of life, that we convert the buying and using of goods into rituals, that we seek our spiritual satisfaction, our ego satisfaction, in consumption…we need things consumed, burned up, replaced and discarded at an ever-accelerating rate.

It seems that Lebow may have been being more descriptive than prescriptive with that statement, but in either case, I think his words hold true for our culture today. He also hints at the idea that the consumer addiction that is destroying our lives and the planet will not be challenged until we understand its roots in our spiritual and ego satisfactions.

A couple of years ago I read a book that had a profound impact on me. Its by Lynne Twist and is titled The Soul of Money. The basis of the book is a contrast between the mind-sets of scarcity and sufficiency.

Here’s how Twist talks about scarcity:

Whether we live in resource-poor circumstances or resource-rich ones, even if we’re loaded with more money or goods or everything you could possibly dream of wanting or needing, we live with scarcity as an underlying assumption. It is an unquestioned, sometimes even unspoken, defining condition of life. It is not even that we necessarily experience a lack of something, but that scarcity as a chronic sense of inadequacy about life becomes the very place from which we think and act and live in the world. It shapes our deepest sense of ourselves, and becomes the lens through which we experience life…

This internal condition of scarcity, this mind-set of scarcity, lives at the very heart of our jealousies, our greed, our prejudice, and our arguments with life, and it is deeply embedded in our relationship with money. In the mind-set of scarcity, our relationship with money is an expression of fear; a fear that drives us in an endless and unfulfilling chase for more, or into compromises that promise a way out of the chase or discomfort around money. In the chase or in the compromises we break from our wholeness and natural integrity. We abandon our soul and grow more and more distanced from our core values and highest commitments. We find ourselves trapped in a cycle of disconnection and dissatisfaction.

In contrast, here are some of Twist’s words about sufficiency:

We each have the choice in any setting to step back and let go of the mind-set of scarcity. Once we let go of scarcity, we discover the surprising truth of sufficiency. By sufficiency, I don’t mean a quantity of anything. Sufficiency isn’t two steps up from poverty or one step short of abundance. It isn’t a measure of barely enough or more than enough. Sufficiency isn’t an amount at all. It is an experience, a context we generate, and a declaration, a knowing that there is enough, and that we are enough…

When we live in the context of sufficiency, we find a natural freedom and integrity. We engage in life from a sense of our own wholeness rather than a desperate longing to be complete…

When we let go of the chase for more, and consciously examine and experience the resources we already have, we discover our resources are deeper than we knew or imagined.

emphasis mine

In the context of sufficiency, we find beautiful music playing just one flight down.

There in this place

where your arms unfold

here at last

you see your ancient face

now you know

now you know.

And when we find that music, we also find compassion and generosity. Here’s Twist again:

The human hand must be open to receive, but also to give and to touch. A human heart must also open to receive as well as to give and touch another heart. That openness and reciprocation, that image of the open hand and heart, connects us not just to others, but to the feeling of fullness and sufficiency in ourselves.

69 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. by a conversation we had in OPOL’s essay Friday night.

    As we try to disengage from trough of consumption, and invite others to do the same, it seemed to me that we have to get to the root of the addiction. And we have to present ourselves and others with an alternative…sufficiency.  

    • Edger on January 27, 2008 at 17:32

    Garbage in, garbage out…

    • Viet71 on January 27, 2008 at 17:34

    That capitalism works only when there’s a lot of free input (e.g., air, water, land owned by the Sioux) and unlimited opportunities for waste output (e.g., a nice river for a paper mill or G.E.).

    America 1800 was such a place.

    America 2008 is not, although globalization certainly offers opportunities to export not only jobs but also waste.

  2. of anxiety, the creation of new anxieties, and I think the idea of sufficiency directly threatens that system.

  3. by going shopping has been quite a struggle for me.  I’ve learned that the shopping doesn’t work . . . still haven’t gotten it down that I’m really not broken.

    For me, isolating myself from the media was an important step along the way.  I appreciated the comment above about “the creation of new anxieties.”  To which I would only add, “and the constant reinforcement of older anxieties.”  

  4. from George Carlin

    • kj on January 27, 2008 at 18:29

    essay:  https://www.docudharma.com/show

    pf8, this comment, or maybe it’s the combination of comments, has me thinking thoughts that don’t really have words to express.  but i’ll try anyway, of course.  ðŸ˜‰

    first of all, the Democrats saving us.  nope, they aren’t gonna and part of the energy here at Docudharma is, for me, that realization being expressed in various ways.  there is a boundary line that seems to have been tossed aside, and so many of us are contemplating the new vista.  even if the vista is named: Beyond Here It’s Hopeless.  at least we’re facing the mountain and we know we don’t have the equipment necessary to climb it, and are talking about what we have inside that might be applied.  you know what i mean?

    at least, for me, pf8, i’m finally sorting through what really needed to be gone through- my emotions- after this last move.  (two moves in two years, over half our ‘stuff’ given away.  you know this drill, it is exhausting on all levels.)  it was your comment the other day about me unpacking my backpack of scribbles, ie, my heart and soul work, that mostly remains hidden, that sort of knocked me back into this line of thinking.  our abstract stories, the narratives we make sense of when reviewing the concrete details of our lives.

    how the hell this all translates into this essay i don’t know.  

    something about our ability to shape what we want/need out of thin air, our ability to make the abstract concrete, if only to serve the needs of our senses.

    ??!!  am lost again!

    Continue to be astounded, NL, by your ability to “pick up” the vibe of this place and put it into new words!!!   {{{NL}}}  

    • LynChi on January 27, 2008 at 19:16

    I used to buy things because they were “cute” or “pretty.”  Then I would get them home, put them on a shelf, and have to dust these cute/pretty things.  I eventually grew to resent the way these cute things took up my time (I hate to dust).  So I made a vow to myself that I would again never buy “cute.”  

    The last cute thing I bought was many years ago – a stuffed bear which I named Bruno.  Bruno now serves a purpose though.  He sits on top of my bookshelf and wears a cap which has “Impeach Cheney” written on it.  He knows that if he is to stay in my good graces, he must have a function. 🙂

  5. can only continue so long. An economy based on consumption cannot infinitely sustain itself, as least with current practices.

    It seems to me that, after the end of the Great Depression, consumption and waste became a status symbol. Only those who were poor had to reuse items and be thrifty.

    These habits are so ingrained in our psyche that they are hard to overcome. People wonder why they’re not happy, and just assume it’s because they don’t have a Hummer.

    • KrisC on January 27, 2008 at 19:23

    This video has been the backdrop this Sunday morning for my family.  The kids have been enjoying listening to Annie Leonard (they’re 4 & 5), it has inspired great conversation for us this morning-they ‘get it’ finally.  What a great tool, thank you!

    I wish I could contribute to the conversation a little more today, but Sundays are not good blogging days for me-it’s family day.

    Have a good one!

    • Edger on January 27, 2008 at 19:44

    The dance of “life”?

  6. between satisficers and optimizers…….

    a satisficer will pick any of several “good enough” optitions and enjoy them all…

    an optimizer has only one possible choice which will produce happiness….

    they agonize over every decision…..

    and are nearly always dissapointed……

    the difference between good enough and never good enough….

    madison avenue has trained us to live in continual dissatisfaction….

    continual disquiet…..

    • Edger on January 27, 2008 at 21:05
  7. I just started to travel around and see what else is out there on the blogs. Devilstower has a frontpage diary today at Dkos titled Annie Leonard’s The Story of Stuff. I haven’t read the comments yet, but I guess Annie was supposed to be there to chat with folks.

    Kewl!!

Comments have been disabled.