Time to put impeachment back on the table

Joe Biden said it recently about bombing Iran and impeachment. Hell, some loudmouth said it back in February as well. But we can’t afford to wait for the smoking gun about whether we will bomb Iran to be the mushroom cloud over Iran, right?

Noted terrorist loving communist far left radicals such as Joe Scarborough and Pat Buchanan are calling for hearings into who knew what and when. And frankly, we know that there was highly questionable behavior with respect to the “when”.

 

We know that there were thinly veiled threats about avoiding World War III and Iran having the knowledge to make nukes by Mister Bush at a time when he most likely knew (or should have known, and someone was deliberately keeping that information from him). We know that the White House still isn’t coming clean, as they demanded that Iran do. We just found out that Israel may have known about this for more than a month before Bush claimed he knew about it.

And now that this NIE contains information that isn’t all too pleasing to Cheney, Bush, John Bolton or the other neocon warmongers, let’s remember what Cheney said back in 2003 about the 2002 NIE that he had changed:

Last October, the Director of Central Intelligence issued a National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq's Continuing Programs of Weapons of Mass Destruction. That document contained the consensus judgments of the intelligence community, based upon the best information available about the Iraqi threat. The NIE declared — quote: “We judge that Iraq has continued its weapons of mass destruction program, in defiance of UN Resolutions and restrictions. Baghdad has chemical and biological weapons, as well as missiles with ranges in excess of UN restrictions. If left unchecked, it probably will have a nuclear weapon during this decade.” End quote.

Those charged with the security of this nation could not read such an assessment and pretend that it did not exist. Ignoring such information, or trying to wish it away, would be irresponsible in the extreme. And our President did not ignore that information – he faced it. He sought to eliminate the threat by peaceful, diplomatic means and, when all else failed, he acted forcefully to remove the danger.

And certainly, the White House defended its’ reliance on the 2002 NIE on numerous occasions (of course there is plenty written about Cheney pressuring the CIA and intelligence community in 2002 for an NIE that was ultimately changed).

So here we are again. There is something very wrong going on here. There was a deliberate use of the words “World War III”, “Iran” and “nuclear weapons” in the same sentence. There is more documented evidence coming out, and more people are stepping forward contradicting Bush, Cheney or some of their war drum banging cohorts. There is an intent to deceive the public regarding whether Iran is a threat, how big of a threat it is, who they are a threat to and why they are such a big threat.

There is no coalition-of-the-anything now except for a coalition of countries who are laughing at us for the predicament that we have let our “leaders” get us into and who scoff at anything that our “leaders” say due to a complete lack of credibility. There will be no more sanctions. There will be no more trust in Bush, Cheney or anyone else from Russia, China, Germany or the other major UN countries.

Congress was pretty complicit, at least by turning the other cheek in 2003 – 2006 as first their own party leaders in the administration and then this past year with the opposition party leaders in the executive branch regarding Iraq, illegal wiretapping, deleted emails, ignoring subpoenas or whatever other crimes this administration may have committed in the past.

And somehow, Congress is yet again given a chance to redeem itself for shirking its responsibility so many times over the past six years with these new developments. Crimes may very well have been committed. Illegal pressure may yet again have been put on the intelligence community by members of the executive branch. There certainly was a campaign to obfuscate and distort the truth – over and above the general “guilt by association” language used so often in the run up to Iraq about Saddam, al Qaeda and 9/11.

On top of all that, it is looking increasingly clear that people at the highest levels of this government (once again) knew one thing and deliberately said another. This country deserves to know if impeachable offenses were committed by Bush, Cheney or anyone else.

Scarborough and Buchanan are right. Investigations are warranted. I know that Rep. Conyers is up for the challenge. I know that he, and a good number of other very fine patriots in the House, knows what is at stake. It’s time to see what happened, who knew what, when they knew it, and whether they deliberately hid it from others that should have known or deliberately tried to conceal it from and deceive the public.

And that means that impeachment can be off the table no longer.

16 comments

Skip to comment form

    • clammyc on December 6, 2007 at 22:00
      Author

    in orange

    • Edger on December 6, 2007 at 22:33

    Just how utterly stupid are people who think Bush makes any fucking sense whatsoever? As stupid as Bush thinks they are?

    How to Make an Atomic Bomb – In easy steps

    Construction Project: Atomic Bomb

    Amazon.com – How To Build A Nuclear Bomb, And Other Weapons Of MassDestuction

    • Edger on December 6, 2007 at 22:37

    Pelosi is determined to keep impeachment “off the table” is that hearings will expose too much impeachable and/or convictable criminal complicity in too many arenas over the past few years for many of the democratic leadership to survive.

  1. So, lately, I call Congress and say only 1 word when they answer, “IMPEACH.”

    I don’t want them to be distracted by names, reasons or zip codes, so I simply say,

        IMPEACH!

  2. (other than the obvious) is, didn’t they expect to get

    caught lying?  After all, when they say WMDs exist and

    NO goddamn WMDs are found anyfreakingwhere, wouldn’t you

    think it’ll be pretty stupid to try and pull the same kind

    of switcharoo again?  At this point I don’t care who else

    might be involved – We have to start impeachment articles

    right this minute!

    • Balzac on December 7, 2007 at 19:49

    I really can’t stand that DINO douche bag.

    http://www.dailykos.com/commen

  3. was a bad idea.

    Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

    • nickk on December 7, 2007 at 23:41

    Just saw this play online that presents the case for impeachment, and wanted to spread the word.  Features a lot of high-profile people.  Check it out here: http://www.podango.com/podcast

  4. http://thinkprogress.org/2007/



    IMPEACH THESE CRIMINALS

  5. they are going to ‘probe’. But maybe as this avalanche of bullshit comes leaking out they will have to in order to save their skins and power! The present ‘reality’ is becoming harder and harder to maintain, and yet the Democrats keep the money and bills flowing. Political reality, the cover they use for their complicity is becoming more and more a tragic stinking joke.      

Comments have been disabled.