I have not left Docudharma

It seems that there is a post at political flesh feast claiming that I have “left” Docudharma.  That is not the case.  I don’t know why a person posted that I have.  Whoever did so seems to be imitating pinche tejano, who has left DD, but whom I have not spoken with.

Since I been made aware of the existence of this post about me at PFF, I’ll proceed to answer a few things that came up there below the fold.

First of all, I have not left this site or Daily Kos.  I have no intention of doing either.  Should I eventually do so, I will inform the site admins here.

Second, I am not a site admin here.  I do have contributing editor status (or whatever we call it) meaning I can post on the FP or promote other posts.  I am not involved in the admin or rules of this site whatsoever.  I am not involved in DD’s I/P site policy, nor have I given any input into any bannings of any posters.  In regards to one poster (mattes) I inquired as to why she had not been reinstated, since initially I was aware of only a two-day suspension.  Budhy told me that she could be reinstated by emailing him.  Not being aware of the particulars of the circumstances of her suspension or that of anyone else, I have not commented on those decisions. 

Further, I don’t plan to comment on them.  Like at dKos, I have some relationship with many of the admins.  Also likewise, those admins do not seek my input into their administrative choices.  Since they do not ask, I do not give it.  If I want my own blog to run how I think one should be, I can have it.  At the blogs of others, I respect their liberty to make decisions as they choose.  If they want my input, they can have it.  If others wish to ask me my opinion, my email address has always been available, and they can ask.  Since no one asks, my assumption, honestly, is that no one is interested.

I hope that clears up any misconceptions caused.  Of course, as always, people are free to ask me whatever they like, and I will endeavor to answer them as honestly as possible in a timely fashion.

72 comments

Skip to comment form

  1. anonymous pseudonyms run you ragged.

  2. I think it should be understood what they will be. They can not be moderated.

    OT I know. Just thought I would mention it.

  3. on pff claiming Jay has left us.

    Now it’s been updated.

    http://politicalfles

  4. you really want to leave us- as does everyone! you just don’t have the courage of your convictions!

    something untrue was posted at pff? wow! just wow!

  5. “I know my opponent is not a pig fucker….I just want to hear him DENY he is not a pig fucker!”

    Those little scamps!

    • snud on October 7, 2007 at 01:52

    *Staightens tie like Rodney Dangerfield*

    • oculus on October 7, 2007 at 05:19

    permit I/P diaries w/o blowing up the blog:  last night I clicked the link to a 2004 DK diary.  What happened to all those commenters?  Also, very little mojo on the comments.  Kind of refreshing.  Maybe just get rid of the rec list and mojo all together.

  6. to incorrectly miss you, and I would of!  I don’t read pff.  For one, Buddhism works great on me and I do usually get what I focus on in spades…..just ask Mr. gravel pit 😉  For two, priorities I suppose.

  7. boy, when i saw that yesterday, i was feeling overdone…

    then when i really saw the poster’s name, i thought no way…

    glad you’re still here

  8. except when done by a hack.

    Meh, Jay, all I got say, you know it can’t be me if it’s done in under four hundred words.

    But what we all can learn from this that there are people who pay a lot of attention to who else we talk to in the meta.

    I just wish my doppleganger had better writing skills. Oh wells.

    Just dropping a quick carrier pigeon into the interwebs letting you know the obvious, that that wasn’t me.

Comments have been disabled.