Mobile version

A perfect storm for unemployment in June

  

by: gjohnsit

Mon May 17, 2010 at 20:59:00 PDT


(9 am. - promoted by ek hornbeck)

   While there is plenty of talk about the economic recovery, there is barely a whisper about what is just a few weeks ahead. It's not any one thing. It's a combination of three (and possibly four) different events that will deliver devastating body-blows to the economy.
  They are all being talked about, but no one that I've seen has put them all together.
That's where I come in, the doom-and-gloomer, with the news that no one wants to think about, but you are better off knowing now rather than later.
gjohnsit :: A perfect storm for unemployment in June
Losing the lifeline

  It's been well-reported that unemployment benefits can last for 99 weeks (aka the 99'ers). What has been almost completely lacking in the news coverage is that June 2nd is the drop-dead date for unemployment extensions.

 On April 12, 2010, Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio attempted the impossible and "urged an extension on unemployment insurance". At that time, Senator Brown also stated, "Many of my colleagues had no problem giving tax breaks to companies that shipped jobs overseas, but now balk at extending unemployment insurance."
 Currently there are four "Tiers" of extended unemployment insurance. If you were laid off early in the recession then you were eligible for the full 99 weeks. But let's say you were laid off in the spring of 2009 and you are on Tier Three of the emergency extended benefits that runs out in July.
  If you are in that boat then you are sh*t out of luck. The only way you are eligible for Tier Four is if your benefits expire before the end of May.

 This applies to all tiers. Thus if you were laid off only, say, 24 weeks ago, you aren't eligible for any federal unemployment benefits when the state UI expires after 26 weeks. Not even Tier One.
 Currently the average duration on unemployment is 8 months. That's going to effect around 7 million people.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

 This means that literally millions of long-term unemployed are going to be losing their last lifeline in the coming months.

 More than 400,000 jobless workers could run down their federal benefits each month over the next several months, even assuming that Congress continues to renew the expanded benefit period now in place.
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

 There is some proposals for moving the deadline out for a few months, but nothing concrete at this time with only a week to go before the clock strikes midnight.
  As for those who have actually used up the full 99 weeks of UI, there is almost no hope of a Tier Five being created.

The limits of stimulation

 From the start of the year until about now, the Census will hire 1.2 million Americans. That's a lot of people getting jobs at the absolute best time. Unemployment is currently higher during a census period than at any time since 1940.
  The problem is that it was never meant to be anything other than a temporary boost for employment, and that boost is coming to an end.

 Since 1990 the largest month-over-month growth in Census workers was the 348,000 hired in May 2000 (225,000 were shed the following month).
 The May unemployment numbers will probably look pretty good because of the Census, but starting in June those same people are going to be laid off by the hundreds of thousands every month.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

 Meanwhile, Obama's stimulus bill is over half spent and is scheduled to be drawn down by the end of September.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

 One of those stimulus items, the homebuyer tax credit, has recently expired. Early effects indicate the slight bounce in housing over the past year is over. Also the FHA is tightening up on closing cost assistance, and poor mortgage lenders.

States of Crisis

 It's hard to miss all the talk of broke states, California in particular, almost all of whom will need to craft a new austerity budget in the next couple months. The current proposed California budget completely eliminates welfare, not just cutting it. That should give pause to those hundreds of thousands of people about to lose their UI.
  To make matters worse, even after those draconian cuts, Schwarzenegger's proposed budget is still $7 billion short of balancing the budget, and lawmakers are in no mood to compromise. Thus we can expect to see another political standoff.

 "California no longer has low-hanging fruit. In fact, we no longer have any medium-hanging fruit, nor any high-hanging fruit," Schwarzenegger said.
 Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

  California is far from alone. The Arizona governor is warning of a "collapse" of the government. New York is running out of money. Illinois is handing out IOU's and says there are no good solutions.
  Elimination of services are not the only things worth noting.

 states will approach their June fiscal year-ends and, as a result of staggering budget gaps, soon announce austerity measures that by my estimates will cost between one million to two million jobs for state and local government workers over the next 12 months...
 States will raise taxes, but higher taxes alone will not be enough to make up for the vast shortfall in state budgets. Accordingly, 42 states and the District of Columbia have already articulated plans to cut government jobs.
 As many as 300,000 of the layoffs are expected to be school teachers.
  On top of no federal unemployment extensions, we looking at a million census workers being laid off, plus another million or two state workers, and this all happens in the next couple months.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

  Will the private sector be able to absorb this labor surplus? Not likely. Small business, the main drivers of the economy, have had their credit cut by Wall Street banks.

 Small businesses continue to struggle to gain access to credit and cannot hire in this environment...
  Small businesses fund themselves exactly the way consumers do, with credit cards and home equity lines. Over the past two years, more than $1.5 trillion in credit-card lines have been cut, and those cuts are increasing by the day. Due to dramatic declines in home values, home-equity lines as a funding option are effectively off the table.
 The solution to this calamity is all too obvious.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

The Ouzo Effect

 The Greek Debt Crisis is causing havoc all over Europe. Bank lending is drying up and the currency is in freefall. In response, the governments of Europe are dramatically cutting back their spending.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

 How much of this will spill across the sea to America is uncertain, but you can't ignore the fact that Europe's economy is larger than America's. The shockwaves are already effecting China, where their stock market has dropped more than 20% and home sales dropping off a cliff.
  If this crisis isn't contained very soon, it is likely that it will have a significant and negative impact on the American economy.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

There is no 'Greek Debt Crisis' (4.00 / 4)
At least not in the way most people think.

The crisis is that Germany, France, Netherlands, etc wants to 1. create a 2 tier EU, 2. Destroy social services and is using Greece as an excuse.


I'm not incline to agree (4.00 / 5)
There is a group looking to destroy social services, but it isn't northern Europe's governments. It's the banking system.

 The Greek debt situation is an unsustainable situation, but then this was true long before the last few months. What we are seeing now is a bear raid from hedge funds, many of them owned by Wall Street banks.

  Germany wants the Euro weakened because it helps their exports. However, they've already invested too much in the currency. A default by Greece is a partial default by the Euro. A partial default is like being a "little pregnant". Even if Greece is only 3% of Europe, it doesn't really matter.
 This situation can't last.


[ Parent ]
The numbers don't make sense any other way, and as part of the package (4.00 / 1)
they're forcing Greece to spend $40 billion on French and German arms.  Is that austerity?  

In fact they're doing everything they can to force Greece etc to default.  Cut jobs? Raise taxes?  Check. Want capitol flight? Skilled labor flight?

And, they forcing Portugal to privatize $7 billion, cut jobs, raise taxes too--the point here is to force Spain to default (when Portugal can't pay) .

None of this is random.

Next: southern Europeans will race to the North looking for work.  The Germans will react...and a real crisis will begin.

As for whether it's the banks or the governments in charge here, well, that's indistinguishable these days.  But clearly the German, French taxpayers just bailed out the German/French banks to the tune of 1 trillion US, although the total debt of Greece, Spain etc, is much less than that (Greece: 200 billion}.


[ Parent ]
Except (4.00 / 3)
The EU just backed up Greece' debt by financing it with "different" debt.

Its like paying your mortgage with your credit card.  


[ Parent ]
Sort of. The EU took German and French (4.00 / 1)
taxpayers money to extend credit to the Greeks, Spain, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, etc.. so that they can pay the debt to German/French banks. So, now when default happens--which experts from left to right say is inevitable now (because of the 'austerity'--not to mention forcing them to buy arms)--it will be the taxpayers left holding the bag not the banks.


[ Parent ]
Although I have no knowledge of this, (4.00 / 2)
haven't read an inkling - because I know this is happening here - why shouldn't it be happening in Europe.  Makes sense.  

It's the trifecta line - only this time used by the current president.

"Disappointment and bourbon are hard on the heart."  (Amanda McBroom, Errol Flynn)


[ Parent ]
The solution is obvious (4.00 / 4)
but won't be mentioned because Dems have no courage.  It's really a shame that a political party is not willing to help those who are the most loyal to them but is willing to drop everything for Wall Street.

Democratic Party does not deserve our support.

IMO, Euro crisis will effect U.S. in possibly two ways: 1) devalued Euro will hurt U.S. exports (only bright spot in economy) and 2) tighter bank credit because some financial conglomerates (Citi) may be hurt.  

A Progressive and Tested Policy for Job Creation

"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."


How in the world have we ended up in a condition structurally worse than (4.00 / 5)
that of our colonial period? Individual states are going broke while a distant national/federal government, to whom taxes are paid on penalty of attachment or worse), functions with their own printing presses to pay a national military force as well as support a banking system that has no interest whatsoever in the financial health of state governments.

Have the MIC and the Banks (aided by the Federal Government) delinked themselves from the national polity in the sense that their interests are completely different from the people who just happen to live in separate states?

Are we witnessing a serious crisis in federalism? Have the people lost their sovereignty once again to the King in Parliament and the East India Companies?  


Yes (4.00 / 2)
Only it isn't a crisis in federalism. What we have is an imperial system aka "globalization". This system is anti-federal, anti-state, anti-national, anti-communitarian. The emergent order has three main actors as I see it: 1) global corporations led by Finance; 2) MIC/Intel (most intel agencies are now rogue and act together in their own collective interests); and 3) organized crime.  

I think their interests are all converging so they are gradually becoming one big order. We aren't there yet and all those forces have their own rivalries and mini-wars so counter-measures can be taken but only if we realize what the set-up actually is.


[ Parent ]
So glad I told the census to fuck off (4.00 / 1)
The plan is to prematurely take out the IRA money and never file taxes again.  With the renewed plans for swine flu part 2 coming online this fall and winter the real Post America may just take shape in earnest by next April 15th.

Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what your country can do to you.

no one is writing (4.00 / 3)
about the drastic cuts in higher education all over the nation.

our university is shrinking 20% over three years.

others are doing the same or worse.

these jobs are gone pretty much forever unless there is a complete about face somewhere at the top.

ya know, like "Gee, maybe we had better educate people to do something and find the money for that like we find money for wars and wall street.

not gonna happen.

Change we can believe in = chump change.


Any ideas on how to resurrect education? (0.00 / 0)
I think the non-traditional online learning could partially fill the gap. I also think a consortium of teachers could take students in a non-formal setting. I believe it is important to continue our intellectual culture perhaps in other venues. It isn't only funding that is the problem but the tendency to for institutions to lose their spirit of inquiry and intellectual ferment and become businesses.

Our culture is already deficient in literacy in the fullest sense of the word. God help us!


[ Parent ]
i agree totally (0.00 / 0)
and am trying to develop my skills to teach on line under some sort of system.  i could do this well into retirement and it means that the 20 people really interested could find me.

hopefully a lot more than twenty.

but this is predicated on enough stability and technology left on the planet to run the internet.

will the servers be the rough equivalent of ancient libraries under preservation by a cadre of devoted monkish technicians who see them as holding back ignorance?

they take a whole lot of energy to run.  

the infrastructure is very expensive too.

can the internet go wireless in the sense of the servers themselves?

in medieval europe the students contracted with the professors privately.

no certification tho' -- we need the opposite of a degree conveying any status at all.

do you know your stuff out there where it counts.  no grades. no certification.  no nothing.


Change we can believe in = chump change.


[ Parent ]
A friend and I discussed (0.00 / 0)
Starting an education consultancy of some kind. Guiding students to find a real education. I'm not sure what the market would be. I do know ways of getting degrees/certifications on the cheap--there are many more alternatives out there than people realize. But do they actually offer "education" in the fullest sense?

Ultimately, I don't think the internet or the large scale sharing of information will change all that much. Even if the system itself breaks down--information can always be transferred by portable storage devices some of which can or could contain large sections of the internet.


[ Parent ]
Tell Schwarzenegger (4.00 / 2)
Carpe deez low hangin' fruit! Asshole!

One of the purposes of unemployment insurance (4.00 / 1)
... is to maintain the workforce.  Thus workers are generally NOT required to take just any work, but work within their salary and skill range.  Then, when things pick up, they will be available to re-apply their skills.

This time around, it looks like that part of the deal is being abandoned.  Part of the workforce is simply being destroyed, and that seems to be okay with them, since by their lights they'll never be needed again.

"I don't mind if you don't like my manners, I don't like them myself. They are pretty bad. I grieve over them on long winter evenings." -- Marlowe


WPA, WPA, WPA.... (4.00 / 1)
Why can't we do this now?

We have a coward for a president.



Ní neart go cur le chéile


Because Big Business finds it more profitable to have high numbers of (4.00 / 1)
.... unemployed than to have to compete with the government for desperate workers. Has the effect of depressing wages and boosting profits.

Given the choice between enlisting in the military and as a civilian, more would chose something akin to an WPA, and they'd lose too many inductees for their overseas military operations.

Same thing with the health insurance racket.  They can boost profits and prices much more easily by always having a pool of the "have - nots." (and charging the "haves" out the wazoo.)  So Congress and the Senate and the President said, hmmm, better leave that pool of the "have - nots" pretty much intact, by design.

The above is why all the financial crooks in the health care reform "debate" were not pleased with my pointing out how this worked.

Millions of people were slated to lose their health insurance anyway, thru job loss, newfound poverty, the insurance company's greed, etc.  Congress said we'll put a lot of them on medicaid, which is shitty because the states love to be cheap with it and they're broke, and we'll call it "reform" but not use the real number of the millions of people who will still be "left behind."  We'll just tell them to buy private insurance and act surprised at how much it costs now.

Infuriating.  


[ Parent ]
Yes--- (4.00 / 1)
The MIC-Finance hybrid has been evolving for a few decades now. They cannot exist without the other, as they require a robust, underlying economy as their lifeline. Authoritarian, Democratic, the form of governance (below) doesn't matter. We are witnessing the formation of this embryonic monster. It must be aborted before it inevitably leads us into frightening chaos.  

Back to Education----- (4.00 / 1)
Shit, I don't know where to begin. It's competitive and cutthroat out there. Take it from me, starting anything (substantial)completely outside the "system" is virtually impossible.

I started an academy 8 years back in a collaborative venture with an existing public entity. It started off with great promise, but it became a threat (enter politics) before a couple of months had passed. I finished off the year and threw in the towel.

The education bureaucracy, textbook and testing corporations, state curriculums and the new cultural rage of "produce now or die" (supported by none other than Obama who looks like an ass after the district that he supported when it fired all its teachers just hired them back--ha ha) are enough to make anybody cringe. Throw in the costs and the need to make some profit, and it's a killer.

Now there are niches for small enterprises such as tutoring, cunsulting, educational materials etc. But setting up a curriculum and program outside of the mainstream system is very, very tough.  


 

Menu

- Create New Account
- Lost password
- Contact Us

Username:

Password:




- Mission Statement
- FAQ
- YouTube Posting
- HTML Help

Seek




Advanced Search


Contribute to Docudharma
 

 
     

 

Action

WikiLeaks Mirror Sites
 

Powered by: SoapBlox