Sub-Prime(Time) Meltdown Hits Fox News Where It Hurts

Over the past year there has been a broad array of economic and political indicators that have been trending generally downward. In the U.S. jobs having been declining, as have exports. Construction has pulled back and property values have fallen. Wages are not keeping pace with inflation. At the same time, approval ratings for President Bush have cratered and Republican Party registration is down. GOP primary voters are showing up at the polls in significantly lower numbers than Democratic voters.

Not surprisingly, this social climate crisis is also being reflected in the market performance of the Fox News Channel. For 2007, Fox News squeezed out a meager ratings increase of 4%. While that was enough to beat the somnambulent CNN’s 2% gain, it was far short of the surging 32% rise enjoyed by MSNBC.

Fox 2007

The new year didn’t produce much to brighten Fox’s spirits. Despite the abundance of news, Fox still managed to lag far behind its competitors. Here is a sampling of some of the important events that took place in January:

  • Primary contests in six states
  • Nine nationally televised debates (two of which were on Fox News)
  • Benazir Bhutto’s assassination in the last days of 2007
  • Deadly violence increased in Iraq
  • Bush delivered his last ever State of the Union Address
  • The stock market suffered historic declines (the worst January for the Dow in 7 years, 17 for the S&P 500, and the worst ever for the Nasdaq)
  • Britany was committed.

This sort of activity usually triggers increased viewing for news networks. Indeed, that was the case for CNN which rose 42% for the month, and MSNBC which nabbed a 37% gain. However, Fox pulled up the rear with a paltry 9% uptick. At a time when viewers are tuning in to news with greater frequency, Fox is being left behind while its competitors are reaping rich rewards.

For those seeking an explanation for the disparity between Fox and the rest of the news purveyors, you need look no further than the content and style for which Fox has become famous. The influence of rightists in the government and the media is dissipating. As it does so, the noise level on Fox News is swelling to an earsplitting shriek. They are descending (and condescending) into a desperation fueled by their own crumbling credibility. They are finding it increasingly difficult to lure fair-minded commentators and public figures to appear on their tainted air. The refusal of Democrats to participate in Fox-sponsored debates is having a real impact on both the network’s performance and their perception as the Republican house organ. That effort must continue and broaden to include ANY appearance by Democrats or progressives (Starve The Beast) The result of this cold shoulder is an over-reliance by Fox on plainly biased personalities like their newest contributors, Tony Snow, Rick Santorum, and Karl Rove. I expect we will also be seeing a lot more of Dick Morris, Ann Coulter, and Bill Kristol, as the Foxians resort to just interviewing one another.

The current stable of Fox News hosts are becoming noticeably more shrill. Chris Wallace recently branded Democrats as “damned fools” for their refusal to be abused by Fox demagogues. Bill O’Reilly went positively crackers as he shoved an aide to Senator Obama because the aide was blocking his view. John Gibson didn’t see anything wrong with making offensive and homophobic jokes about Heath Ledger on the same day the actor died.

Fox News is in a sort of journalistic death spiral of its own. The more people tune them out, the higher they turn up the volume on their idiocy amplifier (and they’re already way past eleven). Then even more people tune out. This process will continue until no one is left but the brain-damaged spawn of a Coulter/Limbaugh clone experiment gone horribly awry.

Fox has already destroyed any pretense of credibility that they might have hoped to use to delude the weak members of the herd, and now they are simply becoming a parody of themselves. They still have a surplus of habitual viewers that may take a while to wind down. But the time is coming when their ratings will be struggling to keep up with the Bass Fishing Channel. And their programming will be just as exciting and newsworthy.

Brought to you by…

News Corpse

The Internet’s Chronicle Of Media Decay.

The Most Painful Vote I Ever Cast

My four year old son is having his adenoids and tonsils out early tomorrow, leaving me no time to vote in my neighborhood. So I headed to San Francisco City Hall today and underwent my own surgery. On myself. With a dull scalpel, a dirty sponge, and no anesthesia whatsoever. With eyes squinched I extracted my vote. It wasn’t joyless, but it still hurts.

I’ve posted long and often about my indecision.  I believe we have two excellent candidates, two great Democrats.  They differ on some details, but they both want healthcare for all, a clean and living planet, better schools, and repeal of the tax cut for the richest Americans.  And the war? Yeah, I know Clinton voted for it, but they both want us out now and, as much as I disagreed with her vote, I’m glad she understands the need to end this fiasco.

Obama captures an excitement that will be his to lose if he gets the nomination and, if he does, he better be prepared, lose that stutter, and get smooth in the face of attack.  He has the potential to be one of the most influential leaders of our century or the biggest disappointment in our lifetimes.

(more beneath the scar)

Hillary Clinton has history, I’ve stood and supported her through her husband’s hijinx and her own races for Senate.  Barack Obama isn’t without history, he comes free of it.  Free of the nastiness that was the 90s, free of rabid partisans at his throat.

Not that the 90s were necessarily the Clintons’ fault.  What should have blown over was made worse by Bill Clinton but far worse by the partisanship of the right.  It was a hateful time for all who lived it. I was outraged at what Republicans did then and failed to do recently as George Bush fractured our constitution in a way that didn’t involve his pants.

The Hillary bashing around here is, in my opinion, entirely unfair.  Her voting record is strongly progressive.  She’s extremely competent and has done as much for the Democratic Party as any.  She has strong labor support and we all know the woman is dedicated to health care for all those who need it.

Yeah, that’s right, I think we’re unnecessarily dissing Clinton.  She deserves respect and our votes (if you’re so inclined).  I know, she comes with baggage.  In fact, it’s that baggage that finally helped me make up my tortured little mind, along with two women in front of me and eight people behind me in line at City Hall.

The women were there together and asked me if they had cut in front of me.  I said I didn’t know and it’s okay, because I needed more time to make up my mind.

“Seriously?” one said.

“Yeah, they’re both good.”

“Maybe,” then she turned to me and the line and goofily mouthed “OOO BAM AA!”

I turned as everyone in line laughed and heard whispers of “yeah!” “you got it.”

You see, for me, it all comes down to turnout and support.  I find the candidates very similar.  I like them both. Hillary Clinton deserves to be president. She’s scary smart and capable. If she gets the nomination, I won’t have to hold my nose to vote for her.  

But I want to see a party united behind their candidate.  I want to see a country standing together to face the disaster of the war, the danger of our warming climate, the perils of mass foreclosures, and the need to help each other without denigration.

As a middle aged white woman, I feel like I owe Hillary Clinton a lot. I’m proud of her and proud she’s a democrat. I’ve been sad when she loses, sad at Iowa and South Carolina, and sad when I took out that scalpel and voted  for Barack Obama today.

The scalpel did not cut clean.  I wish I at least remembered aspirin. But I stood there and blacked the line for Obama.

I think I’m voting for a future.  We’ll see.  The stitches come out in November.

Getting Our Meta On… updated w/sports reference

Meta: a prefix meaning between, with, after, behind, over, about, reversely; a philosophy prefix meaning one level of description higher.

Photobucket

I like the definition of meta as prefix because it captures the utility of the concept. It is between, with, after, behind, over, about… it’s all over the place and seems to be about everything.

Lately I’ve noticed an influx of new screen names and I’m wondering if it isn’t our meta that brings them here.

We are not a site about electing Democrats. But we are crazy for politics and progressive ideas. Although I’m not crazy using the word progressive to describe us. But that’s a meta for another day.

Don’t feed us mere news or facts and figures. We crave analysis.

We are so hip and so even beyond meta… that you’ll find the DD women live-blogging the Super Bowl (GO GIANTS) and when 73rd mentions hockey, you know an undercovercalico comment is not far behind.

We don’t espouse any specific doctrine. Yet we are fascinated by ideas of all kinds. Wait. I’ll get hammered for that… we do espouse the be excellent to each other doctrine.

Our flame wars are mythic. We storm each other’s gates with music videos, poetry, pootie pics, and fight fiercely over the status of cat vs. dog.

We may be Americans or residents here, but our collective interest in the planet has no borders or nationality. I like to think of all us, creatures and plants, as earthlings. I got that from Sesame Street, btw.

There are those of us who are troll huggers and those of us who are not. No matter. A wrong can’t hurt you here. You might even find yourself in the middle of a pie-throwing contest. hmmmm…. haven’t had one of thoze in a while…

We are existential, zenistential, and metaistential… ha! Even our meta is meta.

We believe in constructive chaos and the everything-is-possible kind of meta. Don’t get me wrong. We whine and whimper and get pissed. But, at the end of the proverbial day, we believe in faerie tales and getting our laughs on.

As a matter of fact, our meta is so intuitive that grannyhelen nails it with her very first DD essay in which she discusses health care as an issue and how it relates to the position of candidates. Actually, I’ve noticed quite a few first essays lately.

And because it’s about the stick… the stone… and the rest of the stump (it is life)::::

Here’s Antonio Carlos Jobim’s “Waters of March” sung in Portuguese by Elis Regina and Tom Jobim… a lovely language indeed…

A stick, a stone, it’s the end of the road,

It’s the rest of a stump, it’s a little alone,

It’s a sliver of glass, it is life, it’s the sun,

It is night, it is death, it’s a trap, it’s a gun.

The oak when it blooms, a fox in the brush,

The nod of the wood, the song of a thrush,

The wood of the wing, a cliff, a fall,

A scratch, a lump, it is nothing at all.

It’s the wind blowing free, it’s the end of a slope,

It’s a bean, it’s a void, it’s a hunch, it’s a hope.

And the riverbank talks of the Waters of March,

It’s the end of the strain, it’s the joy in your heart.

The foot, the ground, the flesh and the bone,

The beat of the road, a sling-shot stone,

A truckload of bricks in the soft morning light,

The shot of a gun in the dead of the night.

A mile, a must, a thrust, a bump,

It’s a girl, it’s a rhyme, it’s a cold, it’s the mumps.

The plan of the house, the body in bed,

And the car that got stuck, it’s the mud, it’s the mud.

Afloat, adrift, a flight, a wing,

A cock, a quail, the promise of spring.

And the riverbank talks of the Waters of March,

It’s the promise of life, it’s the joy in your heart.

A point, a grain, a bee, a bite,

A blink, a buzzard, a sudden stroke of night,

A pin, a needle, a sting, a pain,

A snail, a riddle, a wasp, a stain.

A snake, a stick, it is John, it is Joe,

A fish, a flash, a silvery glow.

And the riverbank talks of the Waters of March,

It’s the promise of life in your heart, in your heart.

A stick, a stone, the end of the load,

The rest of a stump, a lonesome road.

A sliver of glass, a life, the sun,

A night, a death, the end of the run.

And the riverbank talks of the Waters of March,

It’s the end of all strain, it’s the joy in your heart.


Four at Four

  1. The U.S. killed 9 Iraqi civilians in mistaken bombing reports the McClatchy Newspapers. “U.S. helicopters attacked allied Iraqi militiamen south of the capital on Saturday, killing at least nine civilians and wounding three, apparently because of a miscommunication during fighting with suspected Islamist gunmen. An Iraqi police spokesman put the death toll at 13. Casualties included two women and a child… The militamen apparently called for U.S. support during the fighting. A spokesman for the local militiamen said that poor communication between the militiamen and American forces was likely to blame. The militiamen were unable to summon U.S. forces directly, and their request was relayed through local police”. Winning hearts and minds — one corpse at a time.

  2. The Washington Post reports Bush unveils $3 trillion budget proposal. “Bush today unveiled a… $3 trillion budget proposal for fiscal 2009 that would slice $14.2 billion from… federal health-care programs, eliminate scores of programs and virtually freeze domestic spending — but would still record a $407 billion budget deficit… The Bush budget plan would continue his first-term tax cuts beyond their 2011 expiration date, at a cost to the Treasury of $635 billion through 2013, extend abstinence education programs, create elementary and secondary education vouchers and guard other White House initiatives… The document also assumes $70 billion in costs for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars next year, a fraction of the true costs, which could reach $200 billion in 2008. Beyond 2009, the budget includes no war costs at all.”

    McClatchy Newspapers add Bush budget – more of the same, and Democrats don’t like it. “Among the biggest spending increases would be a 7 percent boost for Pentagon spending and an 11 percent increase for homeland security, with big increases for border security. Not included is full funding for the war on terror; Bush would allot $70 billion for 2009 but leaves spending targets for future years’ up to future presidents and Congresses.”

  3. The AP reports there were Close ties between White House and Sept. 11 commission’s executive director.

    The Sept. 11 commission’s executive director had closer ties with the White House than publicly disclosed and tried to influence the final report in ways that the staff often perceived as limiting the Bush administration’s responsibility, a new book says.

    Philip Zelikow, a friend of then-national security adviser Condoleezza Rice, spoke with her several times during the 20-month investigation that closely examined her role in assessing the al-Qaida threat. He also exchanged frequent calls with the White House, including at least four from Bush’s chief political adviser at the time, Karl Rove.

    Zelikow once tried to push through wording in a draft report that suggested a greater tie between al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden and Iraq, in line with White House claims but not with the commission staff’s viewpoint, according to Philip Shenon’s The Commission: The Uncensored History of the 9/11 Investigation.

    Raw Story weighs in with 9/11 Commissioner: ‘We had to go through Karl Rove’. “9/11 Commission member John Lehman goes on to tell MSNBC that it was impossible not to go through Karl Rove when documents such as presidential daily briefings were needed… ‘We had to go through Karl Rove, and through [Attorney General Alberto] Gonzales and the other most senior members,’ says Lehman.” Certainly calls into question the commission’s independence.

  4. The Los Angeles Times report on Where blubber meets the road. Some elephant seals below the Hearst Castle are “sneaking past barbed-wire fences designed to protect them, then flopping on blubbery bellies right across California 1… The phenomenon of wandering seals isn’t entirely new. Seals and motorists have had encounters before. Seals have been killed and drivers injured. But Brian Hatfield, a biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey who has watched the rookery grow from a few seals in 1990 to an estimated 16,000 this year, said it had become more of a problem as the population exploded.” Check out the great narrated slide show too.

Politico Stole Two Elections