While this was first posted at Yubanet back on June 30, it’s still highly relevant in establishing that BP Oil Company does not have a stellar reputation for many reasons besides the Deepwater Horizon oil spill happening now in the Gulf of Mexico, besides the explosion at the Texas City oil refinery in 2005 which killed 15 and injured 170. And it shows they have a previous, recent history of deliberately misstating and lowballing the amount of petroleum and gas product being produced. This is relevant now, because BP and the Federal Government have been steadily revising the estimated amount of oil gushing out from the ruined well upwards as they install more oil collection devices which are still not, obviously, collecting ALL of it. Yet documents obtained from BP by Rep. Markey, show that BP did have a “worst case scenario” of 60,000 to 100,000 barrels of oil per day very early in the disaster when the the government was saying it was only 1000 to 5000 barrels. The lower the official amount of oil spilt, the lower the Federal fines, obviously.
Oh, and in case you’re wondering how the ocean touches the Indigenous beaches of landlocked Colorado…. the “Bureau of Ocean Energy Management” is the new name for the old Minerals Management Service, or MMS. MMS, now BOEM, leases out Federal lands for drilling and mining production. A picture of the lovely area in southwest Colorado may be seen here: http://buffalopost.net/?tag=so…
BP is the second largest producer of natural gas in Colorado, per full data last available in 2008.
DENVER June 30, 2010 – The Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEM) announced today that BP America Inc. has been assessed a civil penalty of $5.2 million for submitting “false, inaccurate, or misleading” reports for energy production that occurred on Southern Ute Indian Tribal lands in southwestern Colorado. The civil penalty announced today is not related to the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
The Southern Ute Tribal auditors and MRM found that BP reported incorrect royalty rates and prices for royalty purposes, and reported well production on leases other than those to which the production is attributable.
After receiving audit issue letters and an order, the company agreed with the auditors’ concerns and repeatedly promised to correct the problems, which they attributed to errors in their automated files.
As part of its investigation, MRM and Tribal auditors examined later production reports to determine if BP had resolved the issues, as it had agreed. Bromwich said the same reporting errors were found in the later reviews, “leading us to conclude that BP’s continued submission of erroneous reports was knowing or willful.”
BP reported well production on other leases ?!