April 23, 2009 archive

The torture cover-up will be revealed

A chief lesson of the Watergate scandal was that a cover-up, otherwise known as obstruction of justice, can be more dangerous to powerful leaders than the offense they are attempting to conceal. There is increasing reason to believe that attempts to cover-up their involvement in torture will lead to prosecution of Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Rove and other lawless members of the Bush administration.

We already know that Rice failed to tell Congress that she explicitly authorized torture techniques. We also know that video evidence of the torture of captives by the CIA was destroyed. It is highly unlikely that the CIA undertook to destroy these recordings on its own initiative. But what about the transcripts of the interrogations, and the recorded summaries and analyses of the “confessions” extracted under torture? What about “missing” emails from the White House? If these have been destroyed or altered, there will be very serious consequences for anyone involved in obstruction of torture investigations.

Now that the torture information floodgates have opened and multiple investigations are likely, it is probable that a few of the dozens of people involved in the torture system will talk and reveal actions taken to conceal evidence of involvement in torture. It will likely be the cover-up that takes down Cheney, who I believe was the prime instigator of the torture practices of the Bush administration.

It Is Here We Must Begin

During the 2008 presidential campaign, Barack Obama liked to say that one voice can change a room, and if one voice can change a room, it can change a city, and if it can change a city, it can change a state, and if it can change a state, it can change a nation, and if it can change a nation, it can change the world.

Obama Rally Away from Capital Pictures, Images and Photos

Progressive bloggers already knew that.  We spoke out against the criminal administration of Bush and Cheney when no one else would, because we’ve known all along how important one voice can be. That’s why we started blogging.  We knew an entire nation had lost its way, we knew the corporate media was a wasteland of lies, but we knew one voice can make a difference, we knew that the voice of justice must be heard, so we became the voice of justice.  We would not be silent while a war was unleashed for oil and profit, while war crimes were committed and elections were stolen and justice was crucified on a cross of gold.

We knew that one voice can change the lives of everyone who hears it, that one voice of compassion can touch a million hearts, that one voice of reason can change a million minds, that one voice can become many voices and echo through history for all generations to hear.  We knew that if enough people stood up and spoke out together, our future would be in our hands.  We believed in justice, we didn’t give up, and now a few solo voices on a few blogs calling for justice in 2003 and 2004 has become a nationwide chorus of voices calling for justice.  

Docudharma Times Thursday April 23

Weatherboarded To Prove

A False Connection

Between Al Qaida And Iraq    

   




Thursday’s Headlines:

Third World banker gives boost to U.S. women

Dam of Awe to be Afghan national park

Tamil rebels surrender – but hunt for their leader goes on

Turmoil at French universities could leave students facing missed year

We’ve got it all wrong on fishing strategy, says EU

Israel defies US and destroys Palestinian home

Israel backs down over white phosphorus

ANC leads in South African poll

Somali piracy suspects in Kenya court

In retirement, Fidel Castro is little seen but often heard

Interrogation tactics got the OK early on

A Senate report says Bush administration officials signed off on CIA methods without the input of key agencies.

By Greg Miller and Julian E. Barnes

April 23, 2009


Reporting from Washington — Senior Bush administration officials signed off on the CIA’s use of waterboarding and other harsh interrogation measures in July 2002 after a series of secret meetings that apparently excluded the State and Defense departments, according to information released Wednesday by the Senate Intelligence Committee.

The Senate report indicated that then-national security advisor Condoleezza Rice, then-Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft and other officials gave the CIA’s interrogation plan political backing even before the methods had been approved by the Justice Department.

The document also revealed the existence of a series of Justice Department memos written in 2006 and 2007 that in some cases undermined congressional efforts to rein in the CIA’s interrogation authorities — memos that were excluded from the batch released by the Obama administration last week.

The Senate document represents the most complete chronology to date of the Bush administration’s embrace of simulated drowning and other interrogation methods now widely denounced as torture.

Taliban oust Pakistani authorities in Swat Valley sharia zone

• Fighters force out judiciary, police, politicians and aid agencies

• Clinton attacks Islamabad’s appeasement of Islamist militants


Declan Walsh in Mingora

guardian.co.uk, Thursday 23 April 2009 09.34 BST


Taliban fighters spilling out of the Swat Valley have swept across Buner, a district 60 miles from Islamabad, as Hillary Clinton warned the situation in Pakistan now poses a “mortal threat” to the security of the world.

The US secretary of state told Congress yesterday that Pakistan faced an “existential” threat from Islamist militants. “I think the Pakistani government is basically abdicating to the Taliban and the extremists,” she said. Any further deterioration in the situation “poses a mortal threat to the security and safety of our country and the world”, she said.

In Buner, Taliban fighters occupied government buildings, ransacked the offices of aid agencies and ordered aid employees to leave. Fighters brandishing guns and rocket launchers patrolled villages, forcing beleaguered local police to retreat to their stations. Local courts have stopped functioning and judicial officials have gone on indefinite leave.

USA

Congress Debates Fresh Investigation Of Interrogations

White House Tries to Quell Controversy

By Dan Balz and Perry Bacon Jr.

Washington Post Staff Writers

Thursday, April 23, 2009


The legacy of George W. Bush continued to dog President Obama and his administration yesterday, as Congress divided over creating a panel to investigate the harsh interrogation techniques employed under Bush’s authorization and the White House tried to contain the controversy over the president’s decision to release Justice Department memos justifying and outlining those procedures.

Obama had hoped to put the whole matter behind him, first by banning those interrogation methods early in his presidency and then by releasing the memos last week with the proviso that no CIA official who carried out interrogations should be prosecuted.

Instead, the latest decision has stirred controversy on the right and the left. Obama has drawn sharp criticism from former vice president Richard B. Cheney, former CIA directors and Republican elected officials for releasing the memos. Those critics see softness in the commander in chief. He faces equally strong reaction from the left, where there is a desire to punish Bush administration officials for their actions and to conduct a more thorough investigation of what happened.

Muse in the Morning

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
Muse in the Morning

An Opened Mind XXII

Art Link

Folds

Folds

Each conclusion

is an initiation

a fold in the fabric

our our spacetime

One phase

passes into another

a relationship ends

another begins

creasing our stories

writing our narratives

in the available media

The wrinkled origami

thus formed

is a life

–Robyn Elaine Serven

–February 21, 2006

Late Night Karaoke

 Nikai Thursday

Counter Terrorism in the White House



Rachel Maddow – former Rice confidant Philip Zelikow on the torture memos, part 1

copyright © 2009 Betsy L. Angert.  BeThink.org

In his attempt to counter a perceived threat to America, Philip Zelikow, the policy representative to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and the National Securities Council (NSC) Deputies Committee, unexpectedly became the threat from within the White House.  

The Bush Administration believed the best way to deal with suspected terrorists was to inflict extreme physical and psychological pressure on these perilous persons.  Mister Zelikow offered his dissent.  In a written and verbally stated opinion, Philip Zelikow contradicted what the occupants of the Oval Office accepted as necessary.  “Individuals suspected of terrorism, can be legally tortured.”  

A short time after the Office of Legal Council (OLC) issued the now infamous judgments which allowed for officially sanctioned torment, Mister Zelikow, his superior, who was then Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and her Legal Adviser, John Bellinger, gained access to the torture memos.  After a review, Philip Zelikow stated his concern.  He sensed others within the Administration might share his angst.  However, no one, inclusive of Mister Zelikow,  publicly voiced an apprehension, that is, not until this past week.

Yes, Americans Scare Me. They Might Kill Me.

So said a seven year old Iraqi boy in an interview.  The poor kid has basically lived his entire life in a war torn country, in many ways resembling scenes from Mad Max. Now he is an orphan.  He says that the Americans threw a disk of fire at his house and his family was killed.  He survived but the Americans will forever scare him.  

I guess the first thing that I think when I hear this young boy say this is, “You don’t have to be scared of me young man!  Please, let me help you, I don’t want you to be scared.”

The second thing I think is how angry I am that our politicians and government officials have made young people around the world scared of me, an American citizen.  A person who loves and respects all people, regardless of color, race, religion, or who is ruling their country. A person who loves children and is broken hearted when children are abused, maltreated, or subjected to the terrors of war.

I believe all people are equal.  Just as our constitution says.  The U.S. Constitution.  The same country who now has children all over the world “scared” of Americans.  Maybe that is the most disgusting thing about all this.  Other than the deaths, don’t forget the deaths.

I really don’t care whether Obama and Michelle look good in photographs.  I don’t care what Michelle is wearing or whether Obama has a great smile.  I care about people.  I care about children.  This poor boy and the circumstances the U.S. has put him in breaks my heart.   I encourage you to watch this video.

http://therealnews.com/t/index…

To be sure of the correct link:

http://therealnews.com/t/index…

Nano-Essay: CNN invents Hello! journalism

NEWS ALERT!!!

CNN reports that (OMG) Poor Latinos are victims of abuse nationwide.

When did this happen, how did this happen? Apparently it’s been going on right under our noses all the time. Why didn’t we notice it? OMG!

On another note: people are actually getting paid real money for reporting this stuff as breaking news.

I’ll admit to having been a very active participant in the 60s and early 70s and I didn’t tail off until Jerry died. But what passes for reality these days is getting way strange. It’s all of a sudden news on Earth Day 2009 that poor Latinos are getting abused? Did I miss something some where? Poor people of all sizes. shapes, colors, races, ethnicities, denominations and flavors have been getting abused since time began! I mean like, WTF!!!

There was a Jewish kid who showed up about 2000 years ago to point out the obvious. That didn’t turn out too well for him personally. But now we have CNN here to tell everyone on the planet that poor Latinos are getting abused. Thank God someone’s finally noticed.

I think reality just jumped the snark.

My idea of a vent hole at the moment is Kiluaea up Dick Cheney’s ass.

William Randolph Hearst invented Yellow Journalism when he ginned up the Spanish-American War just to sell newspapers. They forgot to teach you that in high school. Dick used Fox, CNN and all the networks to gin up the Iraq War for his oil buddies. And now CNN invents Hello! Journalism by turning the obvious into breaking news.

Great planet. I love the waves and the fish. Got some tuna steaks and steamed spinach to ingest.

I hope you all had a great Earth Day. It was a hell of a planet.

Shanti.

Open Live Watch Keith & Rachel

Had to do it… Keith is interviewing  Eliz. de la Vega now.

anyone else watching?

Pony Party: Les Chanteuses

Pony Party is an Open Thread.  Please do not rec the party, and please leave your own favorites in the comments.

Torture Timeline

The Washington Post just published a timeline on the CIA’s torture program approval process. Its from a report Holder provided to the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Here are a few of the key points.

Rice gave a key early approval, when, as President George W. Bush’s national security adviser, she met on July 17, 2002, with the CIA’s then-director, George J. Tenet, and “advised that the CIA could proceed with its proposed interrogation of Abu Zubaida,” subject to approval by the Justice Department, according to the timeline…

A year later, in July 2003, the CIA briefed Rice, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Attorney General Ashcroft, White House counsel Alberto R. Gonzales and National Security Council legal adviser John Bellinger on the use of waterboarding and other techniques, it states. They “reaffirmed that the CIA program was lawful and reflected administration policy.”…

Secretary of State Colin L. Powell and Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld were not briefed on the program until Sept. 2003, according to the narrative…

In the fall of 2002, four senior members of Congress, including  Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), now speaker of the House, were secretly briefed on interrogation techniques including waterboarding, according to U.S. officials…

A fresh legal review by the Justice Department prompted Ashcroft to inform the CIA in writing on July 22, 2004, that its interrogation methods — except waterboarding — were legal. The following month, the head of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel added that even waterboarding would be legal if it were carried out with a series of safeguards according to CIA plans. By the following May, the department had completed two more reviews of the program that came to the same conclusion. These were among the memos released by President Obama this week.

A couple of thoughts I had:

1. Pretty damning for Condi – perhaps why we got all the bluster yesterday from Zeikelow, her legal counsel.

2. Pelosi and three other members of Congress knew in the fall of 2002.

3. Ashcroft says waterboarding isn’t legal – so OLC responds by writing memos that it is.

4. I think it might be important to remember that this is a timeline for CIA activities. Sounds like the report from the Armed Services Committee documented a whole different process.

5. That this came from Holder indicates that perhaps the investigation has been underway for awhile now.  

Load more