This should not pass unnoticed. McClatchy reports that Senator Obama’s spokesman yesterday layed out a clearer opposition to Bush’s Status of Forces Agreement than the Democratic Senate has so far done.
The point here is subtle but significant. The Washington Post, in tomorrow’s edition, is reporting that congressional lawmakers are objecting to Bush’s unilateral Status of forces agreement, but have so far not directly raised the issue of Congressional ratification — in other words, have not really challenged Bush. But this is false. Obama’s office did, as reported by McClatchy. In fact, Obama’s position is now directly in line with the position of the Iraqi parliament’s. Bush must agree to a weaked agreement or punt to the UN, and therefore to the next US Administration, for any agreement.
I am not one for optimism in matters related to Iraq, but this appears to be an actual positive and fairly concrete sign that Obama is not messing around.