Mobile version

What to do now?

  

by: tahoebasha3

Wed Sep 29, 2010 at 19:10:48 PDT


(9AM EST - promoted by Nightprowlkitty)

Nick Egnatz, is a VietNam vet, who has written an essay and is someone with whom I have rallied with, from time to time, here and there.  I am showing the entire essay, because the "thought content" may become lost were I not to do so!  

I reserve my personal comments or thoughts (and, frankly, I'm still mesmerizing over the thoughts he portrays in his diary)!  

I must say, up-front, I do not disagree with the accuracy of the circumstances, as he portrays them to be!  Nor, do I think his solutions absurd, but . . . . . !  We all search for remedies -- maybe, Nick's right and maybe, he's wrong!  What do you think?

The Progressive Dilemna

The Progressive DilemmaSubmitted by Nick Egnatz on Wed, 2010-09-29 19:49

A self described representative democracy in which the only two political parties are both funded and controlled by elite corporate interests is a contradiction in terms. Control of the population through government propaganda and a monopoly corporate media have made the domination of the American working class and poor by the wealthy corporate elite consensual. The enormity of the crime against true democratic values is so complete that substantive reform of the present system is an impossibility.

A dilemma is a situation in which one is forced to choose between equally distasteful options. That has always been our consignment as Americans when we venture to the polls (either vote for a wishy/washy Democrat or let the even worse Republican win). Every two years we are told that the fate of our democracy rests on our decision. Well it doesn't because we don't have a democracy, representative or otherwise. We have a plutocracy (rule by the wealthy). Our two political parties answer out of necessity to the corporate world. No one represents the people and the monopoly corporate media will not allow for a discussion of democratic alternatives.

The chickens have come home to roost from the last 30 years of economic neoliberal globalization policies championed by both political parties. Supply side economics of massive tax cuts for the wealthy and deregulation of the very modest checks on American capitalism necessitated by the Great Depression have made us the most unequal industrial democracy on earth. Imperial wars of aggression and massive bailouts of the very speculators who engineered the financial collapse leading to the Great Recession have allowed both corporate parties to take the stance that there is no money left for the people's needs. This is poppycock. How can a consumer driven economy recover if the working class and poor have no jobs or money?

To cut spending on social programs with political cover, Obama came up with the brilliant idea of a Budget Deficit Commission made up of bipartisan hacks from both our two corporate parties, representatives from the corporate world of greed and a single union president. Green Party and socialists need not apply and in fact there are no even mildly progressive Democrats (an oxymoron if there ever was one) on the commission. The Commission is not a result of legislation from our Congress. It was formed by Executive Order. This is the way dictators govern, but that's another issue. The Commission is charged to cut the Budget Deficit by cutting social programs only and leaving the military spending intact. If and when 14 of the Commission's 18 members agree on policy it will go straight to Congress for a vote with no amendments allowed.

Co-chairman of the Commission Alan Simpson, former Republican Senator from Wyoming received some notoriety recently by referring to seniors on Social Security as "lesser people", calling Social Security a "cow with 310 million tits" and asking the question of Vietnam veterans "what have they done for us lately?' None of this bothered our President enough to ask for Simpson's resignation. Their recommendation is due in December, after the election.

We are expected to accept the government propaganda that the unemployment rate is 9.6%, when that figure does not include those no longer receiving or who never received unemployment compensation, part time workers desiring full time work or workers disdainfully referred to as having given up looking for work. Including all these would bring the unemployment figure to 22%. But that still doesn't count those working for less than a livable wage, this would easily bring the figure well beyond the 30% range. This assault on the working class has been the goal of the neoliberal globalization policy accepted as gospel by both corporate political parties since Ronald Reagan started selling it in the 70s and 80s when he set out to save the country from the scourge of a prosperous working class. The Great Communicator pushed his dogma of bad government/good corporations with the same smile he used to push Twenty Mule Team Borax soap to TV viewers years earlier.

More than three million families have already been foreclosed and torn from their homes. Another 11 million families are "underwater" (owing more that the home is worth). Research firm First American Core Logic reports that Nevada with 65% of home mortgages underwater, Arizona with 48%, Florida with 45%, Michigan with 37% and California with 35% lead the nation in this foreboding statistic.

The Republicans propose fiscal austerity for the poor and working class and continued tax cuts for the wealthy corporate class to find our way our of the Great Recession. Obama and the Democrats say that economic growth will do the trick. Both so called solutions are illogical. We are expected to believe that if the big bad bankers would just pretty please start loaning money to businesses, the economy will start humming and everything will be hunky dory?

I'm not an economist, but I have been a small businessman and I have been told on more than one occasion that I have half a brain. The road to recovery is both simple and difficult. For businesses to thrive, for the economy to hum, the business owners simply need customers with money in their pockets. The first step is to put our citizens back to work at a livable wage and the economy will flourish. It will be difficult, to the point of impossibility, for corporate politicians to consider the people at the bottom first, but that is what needs to be done.

tahoebasha3 :: What to do now?
We are told that the fall elections are for the control of our country. Nothing could be further from the truth. We are told that we cannot allow the Republican Party of No to win Congress, yet the Democrats have controlled Congress for four years, the White House for two and there has been no challenge to the draconian policies of social spending cuts, endless imperial war and progressively greater and greater inequality. All now completely part and parcel of the fabric of a nation once founded on the single statement that "all men are created equal." Regardless of which party wins and controls Congress, elite domination of the poor and working class will continue.

Understand that the system is beyond redemption. Recognize that we have exported the cancer of elite domination through globalization across the globe and that the struggle belongs to all the poor and working people of the world. Boycott elections that give credibility to this monstrous system of inequality and class domination. Organize on the basis of class and struggle for the equality that was promised in 1776.

Or you can support the Democratic Party and continue to see more of the same; continued wars, huge military budgets, depressed home prices, foreclosures, abandoned underwater mortgages, progressively greater and greater inequality and Depression Era unemployment. All done while the Democrats complain that they would like to change things, but that they just don't have the votes or the heart or the balls. The last two they won't admit to, but we all know better.

I'm not painting a pretty picture, because it isn't pretty and wishing it was better won't make it so. Voting for third party candidates, independents or so called progressive Democrats only serves to give legitimacy to an undemocratic system. The first step toward a true participatory democracy is to vocally and publicly boycott elections and renounce the American system of money controlled policies and politics through the two corporate political parties.

Right wingers and liberal Democrats both love to say that I advocate for some kind of nebulous utopian dream. If you want nebulous from the right tune in to Glen Beck and Sarah Palin's call for restoring America's honor. If you want equivalent from the Democratic Party listen to Obama's calls for hope and change. Both appeals are long on rhetoric and bereft of specific steps to alleviate the misery corporate America and their two lackey political parties have trickled down on the poor and working class.

This socialist utopian will instead give specific plans for a new birth of democracy in America:
• 100% federal funding for all national elections. Under the proposal below this figure will become miniscule.
• No election commercials allowed. This just allows money to pollute politics. Instead require all media outlets to publish and broadcast periodic side by side statements of all the candidates positions on the various issues. Mandate debates in which all the candidates get a chance to state their positions on the issues.
• Require run-off elections if no candidate polls more than 50% of vote. This will facilitate the growth of alternative parties.
• Either eliminate the anti democratic U.S. Senate or require it to do away with the filibuster rule which allows 41 Senators from the smallest states, representing only 11% of the U.S. population to halt all legislation with the exception of certain budget votes.
• Return U.S. income tax rate on the most wealthy Americans to 90% for their excess income over $1 million. For 45 years (1935-1980) the top tax rate was between 70-94%. It is now 35% and the ever widening gap between rich and poor has made the U.S. the equivalent of a banana republic.
• Institute a financial transaction tax on all financial transactions such as stock sales.
• Cancel all free trade agreements and renegotiate into fair trade agreements in which tariffs are reinstituted to even the playing field when dealing with nations with substandard wages and environmental regulations. This is in line with the policy instituted by the first Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton, done at the behest of George Washington and carried forward for almost two centuries. That is until the neo liberal globalization crowd made their first appearance after WWII and in the last three decades especially have managed to lower tariffs to an average of 2%. The rationale behind tariffs is to level the playing field for our workers. If country A has the same wage rate and basic environmental safeguards as we do a free trade agreement with them is in order. But if country B has a wage rate much lower than ours and pays little attention to environmental safeguards, then we should have tariffs reflecting these differences. Free trade is fine with equal trading partners, but not with countries paying slave wages and polluting the environment like China.
• Give workers a seat at the table on all corporate boards with veto privileges as a protection for the American people from corporate dominance.
• Do away with the minimum wage and institute a living wage guaranteeing all workers a wage allowing for basic necessities. This will vary with the cost of living in different areas and individual family commitments, but for a single worker with no other dependents in an average area it would presently be about $15/hour.
• Institute a massive program similar to the WPA to put all the unemployed to work at a living wage. There is much work to do, let us do it. Our cities need rebuilding, seniors need care, single parents need parenting help, homes need to be made energy efficient, infrastructure needs repair.
• For small businesses that show through their tax returns an inability to pay their workers the living wage, have the federal government make up the difference until such time as the small business can support its workers on its own.
• Abolish the Federal Reserve Bank and institute a national bank with the power to create money presently given to the Federal Reserve. As the population and economy grows their is a need to create money. If this is not done it causes deflation and things get progressively cheaper. While that might sound nice at first glance, not creating money would be every bit the disaster that high inflation can be. Imagine buying a home with a mortgage and watching the price drop every year. That's deflation. We now have that with home prices, but for other reasons. Anyway, the new national bank will have the power to create money and the profit from creating this money will benefit all the people instead of the present banking class.
• The mortgage crisis must be addressed. The megabanks and Wall Street brought it on and should be required to adjust all mortgage balances down by the local percentage that home prices have dropped. The federal government might then consider not prosecuting those responsible for the crisis.
• Capitalism requires continual growth. This is at odds with the earth's environment. We need to create a sustainable economy which does not wreak havoc with the earth's delicate ecosystems. Economic growth is good only when it is environmentally sustainable.
• Just as the poor and working class are required to pay social security tax on all their income, require the wealthy to do the same.
• Recognize that healthcare is a human right and immediately institute either 100% government single payer healthcare for all or have government take over the healthcare apparatus and be both the employer and the payer of all healthcare bills. I was fortunate enough to have such socialized government healthcare for my four years spent in the U.S. military. I found it top notch and my care included an emergency appendectomy and later a prolonged hospitalization upon returning from Vietnam.
• End the wars for U.S. Empire overseas. Close our 700 overseas military bases. Cut the total military budget (now in excess of $1 trillion) in half and then half again.
• Disband the Central Intelligence Agency and apologize to the people of all the countries in which our CIA engineered coups to overthrow democratically elected governments. A partial list would include Chile, Brazil, Nicaragua, Honduras, El Salvador, Haiti, Cuba, Venezuela, Greece, Congo and Iran.
• End military aid to Israel and break off diplomatic relations with them until such time as they agree to abandon all the illegal settlements in the West Bank, tear down the apartheid wall, end the criminal blockade of Gaza and finally allow the Palestinian people a free and independent state based on the 1967 borders that are recognized by the international community of nations.
• The House of Representatives Judiciary Committee Democratic Minority Report in 2005 declared that there was a prima facie case that the Bush Administration broke at least seven federal and international laws in taking us into war in Iraq. If we are to be a country of laws, Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeld, Powell etc. must be investigated and prosecuted.
• Those responsible at the highest level for our policy of torture must be prosecuted.
• Equal diligence should be given to investigating and prosecuting the financial machinations behind the mortgage derivative bundling and trading scams. If they agree to reduce all mortgages by the local percentage drop in value, rework terms for those facing foreclosure, put already foreclosed families back in their homes and donate the rest of their ill gotten gain to charity, we might want to consider not prosecuting.
• The 9/11 Commission Investigation and Report was a complete whitewash. How can there be independence in the investigation when the President is allowed to appoint all the members of the commission? The American people are owed the truth and an independent investigation is absolutely necessary if we are to call ourselves a nation of laws.
• A democracy cannot exist without an informed citizenry. Media purveyors must be required to present the full spectrum of news and opinion.

Politicians from both political parties will avoid these issues like the plague. The question is, should you? Or are you content to support politicians who use soaring rhetoric in describing the plight of our people and then line up in support of corporate friendly legislation that continues the race to the bottom for the poor and working class of America? Will your vote for Congress and the U.S. Senate go to a Democratic candidate who supports not a single one of the above proposals? If the answer is yes and you consider yourself a progressive or liberal, what exactly does that mean?

We can't fix this system by voting, petitioning, marching or lobbying. We have to change the system. The first step is to call the system what it is; monstrous, criminal and undemocratic. The next step is to refuse to participate in elections and to not be bashful in telling others why. This won't save the world now, but it's the only hope for the future.

Nick Egnatz

This article first appeared in OnlineJournal.com
http://onlinejournal.com/artma...

Nick Egnatz is a Vietnam veteran. He has been actively protesting our government's crimes of empire in both person and print for some years now and was named "Citizen of the Year" for Northwest Indiana in 2006 for his peace activism by the National Association of Social Workers.
Contact Nick at nickatlakehills@sbcglobal.net

We are ALL searching for answers to circumstances that have been foisted upon us, without any consideration of us, the PEOPLE!  

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

What to do now? | 55 comments
So, peeps, I have simply posited this (4.00 / 17)
diary for your consideration and, most of all, your thoughts!


"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle

I confess, too, that ARC's diary (3.62 / 8)
got me going (even though I don't have the time (reality))  Holder's DOJ Attorneys Behaving Badly, File Objection on DADT Overturn

"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle

Wow I'm glad you posted this (4.00 / 5)
and yes, it's a great continuation of the conversation that was going on in the other diary.  I'm going to have to reread this more carefully before I can properly comment, probably tomorrow, but if there was a single place I disagreed with that essay, I missed it on the initial skim.

Thanks!

"We who have been nothing shall be all.  This is the final struggle."  ~E. Pottier


[ Parent ]
You're welcome! (4.00 / 1)


"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle

[ Parent ]
I don't agree with all his proposals/details but at least he's trying (4.00 / 4)
.... to get the government to stop screwing everybody over.

Economics and money is totally a made up concept by humans, so don't tell me "you can't change it."  

(I apologize for my internet connection being so damned slow today that I am not interacting more here. wait a second.... uh, bleep you, verizon ! )


[ Parent ]
This was my kinda' thinking, too, ARC! (0.00 / 0)
". . . . at least he's trying . . . . "

(I was having terrible problems with the Internet last night and today -- so, maybe, it was an Internet jam or something -- or the fact Congress critters are leaving D.C. to go home and campaign.)


"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle


[ Parent ]
Hey, Xanthe, are you serious? (0.00 / 0)


"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle

[ Parent ]
What to do now? (4.00 / 7)
Walk the walk, and ripple.

Follow the leader...




What are we gonna do now? (4.00 / 3)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

"We who have been nothing shall be all.  This is the final struggle."  ~E. Pottier

Three things (4.00 / 7)
1.  I believe he is absolutely correct.

Control of the population through government propaganda and a monopoly corporate media have made the domination of the American working class and poor by the wealthy corporate elite consensual. The enormity of the crime against true democratic values is so complete that substantive reform of the present system is an impossibility.

There is no electing more better Democrats, more better progressives, etc. There must be a "New Constitutional Convention". We need to revisit "What went wrong" and then propose a new updated constitution with the "fixes" in place for state ratification.

2.  He forgot to include the unwarranted domestic spying issue and the collection and monitoring of huge amounts of private personal information into a single database.

3. This statement was in the Executive Summary portion of the original draft (of which I have a PDF copy of on my hard drive), but the words "prima facie" were deleted from the final published version.

The House of Representatives Judiciary Committee Democratic Minority Report in 2005 declared that there was a prima facie case that the Bush Administration broke at least seven federal and international laws in taking us into war in Iraq.

Both versions here.

Perhaps it is a universal truth that the loss of liberty at home is to be charged to provisions against danger, real or pretended from abroad. ~J. Madison


Heh! (4.00 / 1)
They don't even need to try and collect our information now -- we're giving it ALL to them, via Facebook, etc.  They know who our friends are, what our likes and dislikes are, our special interests, you just name it and they know it ALL!

"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle

[ Parent ]
We have to assume that (4.00 / 4)
There's really no way we can "outsmart" the regime in terms of concealing  ourselves and our activities.  We just need to accept that they have access to all our electronic communications, and depending on the electronic devices we carry or have in our cars, our movements.    In a sense it's a good thing, (1) we won't waste any time or energy on futile efforts to hide from the National Surveillance State, and (2) it means we have no alternative but to stand up and stand by what we do, say and believe, as any evasiveness will certainly come to light.  Anything that drives us to be more honest with ourselves politically is not a bad thing.

"We who have been nothing shall be all.  This is the final struggle."  ~E. Pottier

[ Parent ]
I agree ... (4.00 / 8)
...with his analysis of the totally dysfunctional system.

...with the list of things which need to be changed.

But, to list these changes after he states the system to be totally dysfunctional is a non-starter.  First he tells us the system doesn't work.  Then he tells us the changes which need to be made so the system can work.  But how?  This he does not discuss, other than telling us we should not vote, that we should boycott elections.

This is the dog chasing his own tail and getting nowhere.

I think we need to return to the principles upon which this nation was founded.  We need a Constitutional Convention.  We need a 2nd American Revolution.  (Hey, Activist Guy) how about outlining your thoughts on why this won't work.

But all I really know is that there is no time.  Our backs are against the wall.  Global Warming/Climate Change comes rushing upon us.

Therefore, there is not enough time to try to change this incrementally.  

Somehow, either we take it back, and we take it back now; or we sit back and watch the destruction of the planet and the multitudes of the life forms upon it.

 

Breathe in emptiness and luminosity.  Breathe out compassion.


Well, syd, (4.00 / 1)
I suppose this could be interpreted in different ways:

We can't fix this system by voting, petitioning, marching or lobbying. We have to change the system.

The Constitution needs serious re-visitation by scholars of Constitutional law -- find the "loopholes" and new language needs to be drawn up to remove the possibilities of anything like what we've been seeing and are seeing ever again.  That's how I feel, but even that wouldn't work -- if you don't have those willing to enforce the Constitution, but prefer to simply "trash" it, as has been done, what difference would it make what we did in terms of the Constitution?  (Sounds like I'm having my own conversation here -- LOL!)

This is totally how I feel:

Somehow, either we take it back, and we take it back now; or we sit back and watch the destruction of the planet and the multitudes of the life forms upon it.



"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle


[ Parent ]
I'm not against trying things that may not work (4.00 / 3)
But I do think that an old-fashioned revolutionary upheaval would be counterproductive today.  It has to do with the fact that the logistical places of the classes in society has radically changed in the past century.  In 1776, in 1789, in 1848 and 1871 and even 1917 it was the ruling classes that were most exposed and endangered in their ability to go about their daily life in a state of social disruption.  The logistical lines that provided the basics of life to working people were shorter and more direct, while the wealthy depended upon an extended and vulnerable supply chain with numerous links and interchanges.  Similarly, the general conditions of working-class life were such that a period of social upheaval wouldn't really mark a dramatic change in the conditions of daily life.

Today however, in our much more complex and interdependent society, the people who are at the end of the longest and most fragile logistical chains are not the wealthy, but the poor and the sick, people who our cause not only tries to stand on behalf, but who contribute the disproportionate share of the real grassroots fighters.   Meanwhile the truly wealthy have secured, privatized and concealed their logistical systems, in military terms their supply chains are in hardened silos.  They are in a much better position today that the rest of us.  The rich person with kidney failure will get their dialysis treatments regardless of the circumstances (isn't that right, Mr. bin-Laden?), but what does the social paralysis that a genuinely revolutionary upheaval, one with a chance of success, mean to the sickly poor?  And that's just one example, one scenario, of how this same pattern would repeat itself in most every area of life.  I think there's a reason that revolutionary movements are increasingly limited to the most backward, undeveloped societies, because in those societies the old logistical arrangements prevail.  The Nepalese landlords and aristocrats have a much more complex and vulnerable system of sustenance than the Maoist peasants do.

I'm not saying this to denigrate or reject the underlying premise that the old order has failed.  Quite the opposite, I agree, 100%, it's spinning into total failure that only benefits those in the hardened silos capable of exploiting that failure.  We not only have that right, but that solemn duty, as the Declaration says, "to alter or abolish" any system of government that becomes oppressive of the people.  I think we have a huge theoretical-philosophical and practical-political challenge to develop a contemporary political analog to the classic revolutionary scenario.If we can't we're in for a very long, very ugly period not just of American but of human history.

"We who have been nothing shall be all.  This is the final struggle."  ~E. Pottier


[ Parent ]
One ray of light (4.00 / 3)
that illuminates the possibilities to me of having a non-socially disruptive revolution was "The Take" as practiced by Argentine workers in the 2001-2002 period.  Instead of walking out on strike, or even sitting in, they took it all the way, they continued to produce, they even opened up closed down factories and restarted production on their own, with the bosses simply bounced from the scene.  There's a change in the control of the means of production, the most revolutionary act of all, with no interruption of production and social sustenance, in fact by opening up the closed down plants, they increased the social product.  That's a harbinger of the kind of thinking and action a neo-revolution will require.

"We who have been nothing shall be all.  This is the final struggle."  ~E. Pottier

[ Parent ]
Excellent! (4.00 / 1)


Breathe in emptiness and luminosity.  Breathe out compassion.

[ Parent ]
Yes, it's just short of amazing, Activist Guy! (0.00 / 0)
I believe it can be done in the meaningful ways, such that you point out as happened in Argentina -- so much is a matter of will . . . . . !

To give you a bit of humor and somewhat aligned with what you've said here, you may like this:  Did you ever read something that you found yourself musing over (smilingly), even the next day?  



"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle


[ Parent ]
What we do have (4.00 / 3)
is nothing short of amazing but not.  You see "we can't handle the truth" meaning we have 60 years of suppressed advanced science we have not dealt with.
Regular people are asking me about the significance of ET stories in regular news media.

Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what your country can do to you.

I only read it through once - (4.00 / 2)
and of course, I agree with it on first read.  However, this is Docudharma and we know our audience - this wouldn't sell in my suburb.  People are so afraid of the word "socialist" or anything that smacks thereof and our betters know this.

As an instruction manual - there's too much going on.  As a manifesto to a country now sunk in ennui - it's right on.

If we are to take one broad issue first - it's election funding.  And that's where our initial efforts must lie.

As a start, I suppose we could ask for paper ballots and write in peoples election funding now or something like that.  And that's all we write - no choices and hand it in --

We're prisoners of a smokedream - that American Dream.  so it's a long haul.  But if it doesn't begin now, when? -  Apparently, we need more suffering out here.  

When Obama walked back on his funding promise, and began to take in the big bucks - I pretty much got the picture.  

Yes, I fully expect hard times for any protestors - that's why the marches have to be huge and well disciplined - people with tape over their mouths for instance.

Thanks Basha.



"Disappointment and bourbon are hard on the heart."  (Amanda McBroom, Errol Flynn)


Also, why do we need two senators - (4.00 / 3)
would we be better with one senator a state?  We could beat the Republicans at their own game.  A smaller government.  Downsizing.  And seriously maybe we should have one or two senators besides those 50 representing the rest of the world - though we would elect them.  Since the big players here are dismantling the idea of "nationhood" two can play at that game.      

I'm sure the parties use the two senators to play their constituency.  

Reps I get - it's the people's house.

And now it's time for salary cuts in Congress.

"Disappointment and bourbon are hard on the heart."  (Amanda McBroom, Errol Flynn)


[ Parent ]
Well, quite frankly, I agree! (0.00 / 0)
OMG, any form of "socialism" and yet, some socialism is exactly what is needed, IMO.  But, yeh, you're right -- it wouldn't go over . . . .!  This is where sound byte type language needs to come in . . . to appeal to the masses who can't even see what may, in fact, be good for them.

As an instruction manual - there's too much going on. . . . . !

My thoughts, too -- we need to attack the MOST important of issues primarily, and then, bit by bit!

Election funding has been wrong for years and years -- remember the one with the most bucks wins!  If elections were fair, first we'd get rid of the electoral votes, but we'd also have a dollar limit across the board for every single individual and corporate donor (hah!) with equal media time per candidate and a time limitation.  And I do believe in run-off voting.  Frankly, I'd be happy to be rid of "Parties" period.)  But the Supreme Court beat us to the punch and gawd only knows what will happen.  We're stuck between a rock and a hard place -- if we don't vote, we give it to the corporatists (but that's not really new, it's just legitimized now).  Our votes?  Well, we can speak.  I like your idea:  peoples election funding  

Xanthe, the whole problem IS THE MONEY PERIOD!  But you know this! No candidate can make it to first base without corporate backing, but then they become "enslaved" because of it.  Look what was done to Kucinich -- almost shoved off the stage!  

Yes, Obama took dug into our pockets and those corporatists!  

Your last paragraph is priceless!

Thank you, Xanthe!


"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle


[ Parent ]
number one item for me (4.00 / 5)

end/change the Filibuster

perhaps only 1 out of every 3 Bills
should be subject to it.


alternately --

make the Senate -- get paid by "piecework"

No Bills passed -- No Paychecks!


ie. Pass One Bill per Pay period.

that would do it.


Where's the Note?    -- SEIU


lol, "piecework", I like that one! (4.00 / 4)
I dunno.... as long as we are DREAMING.... let's abolish the Senate altogether. Let the representative House be Congress.

Then I would change the Supreme Court radically.  Grandmothers only. Give SCOTUS power to impeach various elected pols. Id have to do more research on Six Nations' system for more detail there.

Radical overhaul of the DoJ.

...

"When you realize how perfect everything is you will tilt your head back and laugh at the sky" Buddha


[ Parent ]
and I want (4.00 / 4)
their rate of pay to be minimum wage...
& that they punch in&out on a timeclock.

i'm tired of paying people for only working on their campaigns.
i'm tired of them voting themselves raises.
this way- their voting for pay raises would benefit the least among us.

come firefly-dreaming with me..&..do no harm


[ Parent ]
Too funny, jamess! (4.00 / 1)
But we DO get to these points and why not?  Enforce on them what has been enforced on US!

"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle

[ Parent ]
or perhap even (4.00 / 1)

force them to "actually do the filibustering"

with the cots, and the coffee, and the phonebook reading --

like they used to have to do, back in the olden days.

lol

that would end the practice real fast!


Where's the Note?    -- SEIU


[ Parent ]
Agreed! LOL! (4.00 / 1)


"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle

[ Parent ]
Education (4.00 / 8)
There's no chance in the current social/political atmosphere that any kind of sane choice with almost any issue is possible. The only choice is which segment of the oligarchy gets to loot what. End of story.

Our job, in my view, is to remain consistent in our analysis of  situation and transmit it in the simplest way possible to as many people as possible. Our role is education. We need to create a counter-cultural university that will be of service to people of all ages and actually do three things: 1) provide credible information, where known, about major public issues of all kinds (in short create portals to the vast resources available so any BS argument presented at DKOS or anywhere else can be refuted easily and quickly rather than having to try to find the evidence every time we get in a written conversation); and 2) actually move to educate people in how to be more aware, more alive, more authentic, more themselves, and better able to use their power, intellectual, emotional and spiritual--there are a number of tried and true techniques in doing this; and  there could also be a way to get this stuff accredited so people can have cheap educations and, at the same time, do valuable research.

I'll diary about this, unless I get caught up in "stuff" today.


That's a very important issue, banger! (0.00 / 0)
Getting accurate information out to people. Both 1 and 2 are so true.  

I've said so many times that it would be great if blogsites had an "umbrella," where some mutual organization could be achieved in planning actions.  Yes, that happens with rallies in D.C., such as the one coming up on October 2nd, One Nation!  But, I'm thinking of other sorts of actions where a massive organization, so to speak, would have truly been effective and may still effective, in measure.

"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle


[ Parent ]
I would like to expand on this comment a bit! (4.00 / 1)
We have the numbers, we simply don't have the organization.  If, hypothetically, we had an "umbrella" where ideas and literal efforts could be floated, then actions could be planned.

Take, for example, if we had the agenda of Congress lined up, we then could develop ideas for countering outcomes we don't want.  Yes, planned actions to each and every bill that represent some form of threat to Americans, or the inaction of which allows for the environment to continue to suffer, etc.

Take the Energy Bill that we hoped would happen.  During the hemming and hawing of that Bill, an organized "umbrella" community could have shut off their electricity for a couple of hours each night all across the nation (or some such).  This sends a clear message and hurts their pockets, as well.  We need to hurt corporations financially -- this is the only thing they would be compelled to pay attention to, as well as waking up Congress members.

If these sorts of "planned actions" were done regularly, when bills were being considered, it could make a difference.  

And a way we could hurt a whole bunch of corporations at once would be a massive community agreeing to turn off their TVs for just one week.  Can you imagine?   Here's a list of who owns what media Who Owns What. .  Take GE, for instance, look at all the media it owns -- GE is heavily into defense production, too!  

BP is continuing its use of Coexit in the Gulf -- this dispersant is toxic and is killing off ocean life and contributing to our noxious environment.  And, yet nothing is done to stop it.  If we were organized, we would let our reps in the government know how we feel about this continued use of "poison" and then refuse to buy any BP product until the government made sure its use was ended.

Well, I could go on, but this is kinda' the idea of actions that would send LOUD messages!

   

"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle


[ Parent ]
I recently found (4.00 / 1)
this "umbrella" organization.

Craigslist Foundation

Boot Camp - We should all work together to build stronger communities. We inspire and teach people how at this annual conference.

Knowledge Sharing - Community builders need access to success stories from other communities to discover best practices, strategies and proven methods. We propose creating a tool that helps people discover solutions relevant to their community building efforts.



Perhaps it is a universal truth that the loss of liberty at home is to be charged to provisions against danger, real or pretended from abroad. ~J. Madison

[ Parent ]
Thank you, wolverine06! (4.00 / 1)
I'm going to check that out more thoroughly!  

"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle

[ Parent ]
For this to happen, (4.00 / 4)
The heads of the very wealthiest .01% have to roll.  It will take a French Revolution in America.

Without it, you can kiss these ideas good-bye.

Now, are you ready and willing, and most importantly, desperate enough?


I am... (4.00 / 1)
...because, as I said above, we are out of time.   The End Is Nigh!

Pick an issue on the list, any issue...

at random, and think about how long it will take to get anywhere with it.  Let's try getting money out of elections.  Just look at how long we have already been talking about and trying on this!  Years!

But we don't have years to spend on a single issue.  And multiply that by, say, 100 issues!  

"While at my back I always hear time's winged chariot hurrying  
near."  Change Marvel's chariot to global warming.  We don't have the time to play with a dysfunctional, broken election system to tweak the system.

Global Warming is imminent!  

We need to change the system NOW.  We need a new Constitutional Convention.  We need to take the words from the Declaration of Independence seriously.  

Governments are instituted amongst men in order to provide for the common good.

Our Government ceased providing for the common good at least 3 decades ago.

Ergo, as the Declaration of Independence states -- It is our right, it is our duty to change that government.  And since they do not, will not listen to us, revolution is the only alternative for fulfilling the words of the Dec of Indie... and returning our nation to its original promise.  --- Before Global Warming, Nuclear winter, or some other manifestation of our ignorance renders our evolutionary experiment extinct.

Breathe in emptiness and luminosity.  Breathe out compassion.


[ Parent ]
Sadly, I fear that you're correct, David G. Mills! (4.00 / 1)
It's all gone on too, too long with not even more than a whisper of trying to arrest it all.

Americans ONLY act when they feel the pain, when there's nothin' left to lose!

"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle


[ Parent ]
Don't Forget The History Of False Flag "Attacks" (4.00 / 1)
I don't necessarily agree with everything in this vid, but he gives a generally accurate view, IMO, of how populations are currently being controlled.



I'll be scared later, right now I'm too mad--Bugs Bunny


Merci, taoskier! (4.00 / 1)


"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle

[ Parent ]
Excellent and dead-on! (4.00 / 1)
I could not quibble with one word!

"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle

[ Parent ]
Liberté, égalité, fraternité (4.00 / 3)
Blood and ashes!!
Hate to say it but the only thing I see that's gonna change the system in which we live and which we leave to the future is revolution.  Bloody, violent evil revolution.  I don't know that the writer has the right answers or not I think for the most part hes on the mark but dropping out of the electoral process wont change squat as long as somebody runs as a Rep. or Dem. and somebody votes for em control will not be relinquished peacefully. The praetorian guard (Xe) is ready , the armies are sworn and mobilized, cops are brainwashed and our civil liberties are already gone.  Lists are compiled, protesters are being accosted, whistle blowers are being tried, free media is being hemmed in.
I don't normally do conspiracy theory but to me this is glaringly obvious and scary as hell.

Thanks for posting the piece Basha

Je pense donc je suis - René Descartes


Although I think Revolution is the only way... (4.00 / 4)
...out of our current mess, I don't agree with "Bloody, violent evil revolution."

We're back to the primordeal argument between Gandhian &/or Malcolm X tactics.  I can't decide for others.  But for myself, I will not be violent.  I will walk point, unarmed, peacefully, non-violently.  I do not think that the other side will honor my position.  They will likely think me a fool.

And, if our revolution begins to have any success, to show any sign of succeeding, they will mow us down with all the bloody violence they can muster.But I will not be violent.  I am ready.  

Perhaps noone should stand near me, however, because,  having COPD and Emphysema, I need to have my oxygen tank with me.  When/if the brainwashed cops turn their heating devices which make the blood boil on me it's apt to blow up my Oxygen tank.  

I'm not kidding.  I'm serious here.  In the 1980s when I protested U.S. foreign policy in Central America with the Nurenberg Actions at the Concord Naval Weapons Station, I used to councel people who bacame disheartened with our inability to change the system, I would say:

We shouldn't be attached to the results.  The process is long.  We do what we do not because we see the results, but because it is the right thing to do.

But that admonition is no longer valid.  Now we must be attached to the results, because the stakes are the life and death of the planet and the beings living on it.

Revolution is the only possibility to take our country back before the sun sets on our evolutionary experiment.

Breathe in emptiness and luminosity.  Breathe out compassion.


[ Parent ]
As Steve Martin famously said "I'm wit you(Vinnie)" (4.00 / 2)
I haven't lifted a hand in violence since I became an adult and don't intend to anytime soon (ever), but my cynicism regarding our species is pretty well developed.  I see many like yourself and hopefully myself who will as you say walk point I do however fear truly catastrophic events in the near future that will include much blood and violence. When the basics of life are denied people fight and more and more people are loosing access to the basics, food, shelter, water clothing.

Great movie that:  My Blue Heaven  

Je pense donc je suis - René Descartes


[ Parent ]
Thats Vinnie to Barney (Rick Moranis) (4.00 / 2)


Je pense donc je suis - René Descartes

[ Parent ]
This is America... (4.00 / 2)
When the future you describe arrives there will be no "non-violent" resistance...

This state will brand all resisters as violent extremists.

Whether or not you are personally dedicated to non-violence will not matter...

You are the opposition to the norm...

Thus..
You must be crushed.

Ní neart go cur le chéile


[ Parent ]
Well, the Bushies certainly made SURE that we would (4.00 / 1)
be set up for such an event, n'est que c'est pas?  

Well, I, somehow, believe ALL of this has to do with an elitist notion that we are over-populated and they, in their benevolent beings must find a way to deal with all of this.  So, what's the answer?  Just KILL people anywhere and everywhere -- right here in our own hometown.

BTW, have you ever seen the movie "The New York Gangs"  -- around the 1850's or '60's as I recall -- where the "new" Irish into the country (in N.Y.) were met with such exploitation and violence unbelievable.  It's a totally violent movie, but depicts that which is native to us -- VIOLENCE!


"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle


[ Parent ]
I know that. (4.00 / 2)
You are correct, and I accept this reality.  My decision remains.

Breathe in emptiness and luminosity.  Breathe out compassion.

[ Parent ]
Well, I think I want to make a comment here, at this juncture! (4.00 / 1)
I think we all agree that Nick's assessments of our reality is accurate.  

Having ideas is important, which is why I posted them -- they are ideas about which the writer feels need to be done and, and whether or not you agree with every single one of them wasn't at issue.

All ideas, big or small, are worth taking a gander at, IMO.  But, then, they should be broken down as to which is the MOST important, which is realistically based, in terms of being achievable, and how does any of it get implemented?  

But, I, myself, while I didn't really quibble with most of the ideas, something gave me an uneasy feeling at the same time.  Maybe, it was the not voting part.  I don't know.  In a way, Nick's right, by voting we continue to support the system as is.  But, there's the Supreme Court ruling and our votes may not mean diddly anyway, but is not voting the way to go?

But, the real problem is, as dharmasyd and others point out, that we really, really don't have time to perform these steps to "final surgery!"  Time has run out.  Global warming is in our faces!  Which, also reminds me that BP stills uses its own product Coexit freely in the Gulf.  Coexit becomes comingled with minute oil particles and moisture sucks these particles into the air and comes down to our midsts with the rain -- and NOTHING is done to stop the use.

Return to the Bill of Declaration and the Constitution?  That could have been done were the right things done in the beginning of 2009, or as far back as 2005-6.  Impeachment -- removed from our grasps!  Investigations and prosecution of war crimes -- no, we need to look forward.  But here is where our nation's foundation became lost.

And now!  Revolution does seem the only alternative left.  Civil, non-violent, yes, absolutely.  But are revolutions ever non-violent in Western civilizations?

More ideas?

"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle


First quick answer (4.00 / 2)
Sure, there's been non-violent revolutions in western societies, in recent years even.  Consider East Germany and Czechoslovakia.  Of course, the key factor is the choice of the authorities not to turn to violence.  Put simply, the US government is far less likely to show such forbearance than the East German government.  That we all know that to be true should tell us a great deal as to where we stand, and why some sort of reboot of the system is our only hope.  But the reality remains that the modern US hegemonic regime has not only technologies of surveillance and suppression far beyond that of any other regime in history, but even more important are its techniques of distraction, diversion and division.  

It's the ability of hegemony to use its media and other elements of the means of information to isolate and suffocate any revolutionary movement that grabs its attention that makes me believe we need to build a movement that at least in its early stages has no visible profile.  This is where my idea of "base groups" has its genesis.  My idea of the "base groups" are this:  not unlike  the affinity groups of the late 70s in formal structure and action, but this important precondition, that they be formed among people whose affinities precede their politics.  Where the bonds of loyalty and trust between the members of the groups stem from family relation, long-term friendships, longtime neighbors and coworkers.  That makes the base groups impervious to penetration and provocation as well as providing cohesion in action.

It's not easy asking people close to you to join you as an activist.  For most of us who have been activists for some time, our friends and family know we've been activists, that's part of what they see as our identities, and a thing which makes us different from them.  Most of us have respected that, and have tended not to ask more of those personal relations than a vote for this, a signature on that petition.

A useful thing then to reach out to such close ones ISTM would be a basic pamphlet (perhaps also produced as a YouTube video for linking), well written and attractively designed so that it's readily read and understood, that lays out the reasons that now is the time that citizens must engage personally and directly, to, as the Declaration had it, preserve the blefsings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity.  It must also lay out the basic strategic plan, stating in plain language why reaching out to family and friends is the essence of building this reborn, more just America.  That we can rebirth America in the image of those bonds of kinship, in that sense of shared common space that can exist with friends, family, neighbors.  I suppose I could try to put something like this together myself  but this is where my lack of formal education hurts me, I don't have the experience with writing that formal higher education provides.  My sentences get all undisciplined and run-on, and I get too wordy, and the result is my writing ends up leaden to readers.  But I suppose now that I've named it I ought to make the effort.  Perhaps the thing to start with would be to make an outline?

"We who have been nothing shall be all.  This is the final struggle."  ~E. Pottier


[ Parent ]
This is a wonderful response, Activist Guy! (4.00 / 2)
It's accurate and sooo, soo, much a part of our problem!

You speak clearly, distinctly and most earnestly -- I'm not sure what more any of us could wish for or do!  

THIS is an "idea" thread -- I think your YouTube idea is great, for so long as it will last!  

"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle


[ Parent ]
Was Tom Paine highly educated? (4.00 / 2)
Was Emma Goldman?

Maybe you just need an editor.  Lack of formal education shouldn't hinder you - passion counts as well.

I'm not sure that the internet is safe for even the sane, peaceful movement you're speaking of - or the massive civil disobedience we really need which some of us have spoken of - I think it is highly monitored.  And will become more so in any event.  

 

"Disappointment and bourbon are hard on the heart."  (Amanda McBroom, Errol Flynn)


[ Parent ]
An editor (4.00 / 2)
I have been going over this in my mind, and it strikes me that I might try putting this together  in pieces, and if the participants of this site don't mind, using posts here as a means of getting editing help. Still not fully sure I'm ready to take this on, but I suppose the point of challenges is to be challenging!

"We who have been nothing shall be all.  This is the final struggle."  ~E. Pottier

[ Parent ]
We don't lack for decent writers here. nt (4.00 / 1)


"Disappointment and bourbon are hard on the heart."  (Amanda McBroom, Errol Flynn)

[ Parent ]
Let me try something (4.00 / 1)
Fuck the US Federal Government!

http://www.infowars.com/new-in...

Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what your country can do to you.


Interesting, LH! (4.00 / 1)
I don't think we dislike Federal Government so much -- it's just the people in it we have developed a dislike for because they're screwing the life out of us, literally!  You know, there's nothing wrong with marriage, itself, it's the people in it!  LOL!

"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle

[ Parent ]
Belated thanks, NPK, for (4.00 / 2)
"uplift."  

"At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst."--Aristotle

What to do now? | 55 comments
 

Menu

- Create New Account
- Lost password
- Contact Us

Username:

Password:




- Mission Statement
- FAQ
- YouTube Posting
- HTML Help

Seek




Advanced Search


Contribute to Docudharma
 

 
     

 

Action

WikiLeaks Mirror Sites
 

Powered by: SoapBlox