| I looked around me, and saw people surrendering, despairing, and was I any stronger than they, any more dedicated? No. But maybe I was a little smarter.
One of my favorite scenes is from the Good, the Bad and the Ugly, which I first saw during that period. Clint Eastwood and bandit Tuco (Eli Wallach) both know one piece of where the gold is buried, but Bad Lee Van Cleef has them captive. Van Cleef calls Tuco (a very tough guy) into his office and beats his part of the information out of him, then sends Tuco off to be killed. Van Cleef calls Eastwood into his office and negotiates. Eastwood looks down at the floor and sees Tuco's blood, asks Van Cleef why he isn't getting the same treatment. Van Cleef answers that he knows that Eastwood knows that if he tells his half of the puzzle, Van Cleef will kill him, so no amount of beating will get it out of him. Knowledge can be strength.
So I knew that all the fears and despair that I saw washing over friends and comrades were going to come washing over me. I had no illusions about being better than they. But knowing what was coming was what made it possible to both absorb and shut out that despair, able to tell myself that what I was feeling was just "the man" inside my head, hanging on somehow in a nearly catatonic state for years. What snapped me out of it was reading that a couple of guys from the Progressive Labor Party at a Detroit auto plant had locked themselves inside an electrical cage over some minor floor dispute, shut the whole factory down for four hours, and walked away UNPUNISHED. Maybe the working class could be as destructive as college students.
But I wasn't the same. In the 60's I had put principles above all else, being right was enough, took those principles to the max, had in some ways been as dumb as a post because the revolutionary tide of the 60's had floated all boats, so to speak. And we had ultimately paid a terrible price. I became obsessed with tactics and methodology. Studied Mao and Lenin. Learned that quotes from either could be used to support either side of almost any argument.
It became fashionable to trash the 60's, and I could do so at length in certain circles. But looking at the level of discussion today, there is much to learn regarding method. We talked about what the good society would look like. We talked principles. We talked tactics. We talked about which social groupings (like classes) were the engines of change. We talked about how these groupings related to each other. We talked about our souls, our spirits, our values. In hindsight, in so many ways, we hadn't the brains god gave a goose. Went to too many demonstrations without a helmet, to do a twist on Gerald Ford. But tying it all together, we talked about how we saw the PROCESS of social change.
But that aside, I decided that no longer would I go to war over abstract principle, I had to be able to personally connect, able to see that this led to that and where it was going. I had to work from the premise that if I was feeling something, thinking something, wanting something, then I couldn't be alone. Not that I wasn't regularly surprised and/or mistaken, but keeping that connection kept me from the abyss.
So I was a student worker, organized an organizing committee to unionize us. Went full-time, organized a rank-and-file caucus that successfully challenged the leadership of the MSU company union. Became unemployed, organized an Unemployed Council that chased army recruiters out of the unemployment center.
Organized a district committee during a rent control campaign in San Francisco, wrote and typeset for the National Alliance newspaper. Campaigned for Lenora Fulani and Ross Perot and Barry Commoner and Peace and Freedom Party and Reform Party, and was on the street for any number of Democratic Party candidates and ballot initiatives.
Everyone along the way sold out or burned out. And I got old, got married to Rose (the bright note!), got diabetes got a damaged left knee, got worn down and burned out and just plain tired. And how is burning out any different than selling out? Practically? For years, haunting the blogs was my main activity while I put in my time in a boring office programming insurance forms (property insurance), while my most creative energy went into building WWI model airplanes ( http://www.jrroseenterprises.c... ). It got worse.
Last year, my wife was forced out of her job. She had worked for 10 years at one of Wall Streets leading regulatory agencies, and was the victim of utterly vicious sexual harassment by an up-and-coming manager. She complained to upper management, and they lowered the boom on her. She quit under the threat of assault and firing. Next week, I was laid off, ostensibly because my job had been outsourced to the Philippines. And because I took too many sick days, though they couldn't say that out loud.
We ran through our savings, quit paying our mortgage, are hanging on through unemployment extensions while hoping to sell our home before the wolves catch up with us. It was a very bitter period. Depressing, enraging, terrifying, mere survival our goal.
So I'm sitting at the computer reading the blogs, and my wife Rose is watching some HBO show on New York garment workers, and she interrupts me, she's highly agitated. The show had a segment on the 1911 Shirtwaist Factory fire where 148 young women were burned or leaped to their death because they were locked inside to keep them from sneaking out for a cigarette. And how after the "day it rained children," hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers took to the streets in protest.
So Rose is in a rage, that in those days, with no internet, no TV, hundreds of thousands would march. And today ... nothing. So we sat and talked, about our own fear and anger, how dead the American people are, somebody had to do something. But what? The combination of my own rage and powerlessness was intolerable. But screaming wasn't enough. I had to come up with something real to do. Calling on a previously stated premise, that if I was feeling something, thinking something, wanting something, then I couldn't be alone. Some way to turn the rage and fear I know is out there into activity, into organization, into power.
I came up with the Full Court Press. It's small, has nowhere the scope that is needed for the changes I know we need. I have ideas about the unemployed, as I've mentioned elsewhere. I think if I got really sick, I'd march down to my congressman's office and chain myself to the door. Maybe not. But if a hundred of us were (and aren't we?) sick, and someone could get us on a bus to DC ... so many possibilities. We are collectively, vastly more sophisticated than in the 60's, have vastly more tools to organize with.
But where's the spark? Where's the "here I make my stand"? Where's the "not with my life you don't"? Have we become numb? Have we become dumb?
No, we're not numb or dumb. In the 60's we took to the streets. What's missing is the link, now, between our collective keyboards and the streets. What's missing is grappling with the hard topic of the PROCESS of social change. We are constantly absorbed in the present, and this is blinding. If we can build that connection, if we can think outside the given moment, then I think other pieces would start to fall into place. They're all there.
And while I still find the world enraging and terrifying, I no longer find it depressing! |
WikiLeaks Mirror Sites
