Mobile version

We Hold These Truths To Be Self-Evident

by: Rusty1776

Fri Aug 28, 2009 at 17:10:49 PDT        
| More


( - promoted by buhdydharma )

The Founding Fathers gave us democracy.

The Founding Fathers Pictures, Images and Photos

We have the moral responsibility to restore what was given to us, to take back what has been taken away by corrupt politicians of both major parties.  If the Democratic Party won't restore American democracy, it will be up to Progressives to restore it.  If Democrats cave again and pass a travesty of a health care reform bill without a strong public option, there will no longer be any doubt that the two-party system has been corrupted beyond salvage.  If that happens, I believe progressives will have no choice but to dissolve all ties with the Democratic Party, establish the Progressive Party, and ask progressive Democrats in Congress and across this country to join us.  

A Netroots Declaration

When in the course of Democratic betrayals it becomes necessary for Progressives to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with the Democratic Party, and to establish ourselves as a New Party in the political system, our respect for the Constitution and the rule of law compels us to declare the causes which impel us to this separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that the Democratic Party is complicit in war crimes, that it is complicit in illegal NSA spying, that it is complicit in massive Wall Street fraud, that it no longer believes that all men are created equal, that it serves only the corporate masters of America, that it has granted them unalienable Rights, that among these are the right to plunder the Treasury, the right to control the media, the right to subvert the banking system, to corrupt the electoral system, to ravage our economy and reap the illicit profits of shock doctrine capitalism.

To enable the voices of citizens to be heard in the corridors of power, political parties have been instituted among Men, deriving their power from the support of their members. Whenever any political party becomes destructive of these ends, its supporters have the right to withdraw their support, and to establish a new party.  As Progressives, we have no choice left but to establish a new party, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in accordance with our responsibility to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and the progressive values upon which it was founded.  

Present circumstances dictate that a political party long established should not be rejected for light and transient causes; but when a long train of abuses and betrayals, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce an entire nation under corporate Despotism, it is the right of Progressives, it is the duty of Progressives, to condemn that party, and to establish a new party for their future security.  

Rusty1776 :: We Hold These Truths To Be Self-Evident
Such has been the patient sufferance of Progressives; and such is now the necessity which compels us to leave the Democratic Party.  The history of the present Democratic Party is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of corporate tyranny over the United States.  To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

This Democratic Congress and Democratic President have refused to support single-payer health care, which is most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

They have refused to enforce Laws of immediate and pressing importance, they have refused to enforce the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, they have utterly neglected to conduct themselves in accordance with the foundational principles of representative government.

They have refused to pass the Employee Free Choice Act, as well as multiple other Laws beneficial for American citizens and absolutely necessary for the preservation of representative democracy.  They have thus relinquished their right to Represent us in the Legislature, a right we granted them, a right we must now take away.

They have called together Republicans to join them in obstructing comprehensive health care reform and have willingly slogged into a bipartisan quagmire, determined to protect the insurance industry while expecting Progressives to support the travesty of a bill that emerges from that Death Panel of Democracy they call the Senate Finance Committee.

They have obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing to investigate and prosecute the crimes of  the Bush Administration, while giving their Assent to the establishment of a national security state based upon endless war overseas and the crushing of civil liberties at home.

They have been complicit in confirming right wing Supreme Court justices who have empowered police to taser any American citizen at any time for any reason, who have destroyed the ability of unions to organize, who have empowered corporate interests to bribe and intimidate our elected representatives, thus rendering American citizens powerless to defend themselves against repeated exploitation and abuse.

They have kept among us, in violation of the Bill of Rights, NSA spies who are monitoring with impunity every phone call we make, every email we send, every form of communication we engage in no matter who we are or where we are.

They have confiscated 10 trillion of our taxpayer dollars on behalf of the Federal Reserve, which has given it to Wall Street criminals with no oversight and no accountability.

They have combined with Republicans to subject us to abuses of power and obstructions of justice in violation of our Constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving their Assent to unconstitutional Acts of repressive Legislation such as the Patriot Act and the Military Commissions Act:

For enabling the Bush Administration to launch wars of aggression and occupation in violation of international law.

For protecting them from punishment for every war crime they have authorized to be committed upon anyone, anywhere in the world.

For decreeing that telecoms engaged in massive violations of the 4th Amendment are above the law, thus ensuring that they will not be held accountable for their crimes:

For complicity in depriving American citizens in many cases, of the benefit of habeas corpus and Trial by Jury:

For complicity in transporting them beyond the Seas to be tortured for pretended offences:

For complicity in abolishing the regulatory system which protected our banking system and economy from corporate exploitation and Wall Street fraud, establishing therein an Arbitrary government of Plutocrats with unlimited power:  

For complicity in taking away our Bill of Rights, for complicity in abolishing our most valuable Laws, for complicity in fundamentally altering the Forms of our Government, leaving only the illusion of democracy behind:

For complicity in plundering our Treasury, in ravaging our economy, in burning our Constitution, and in destroying the trust of the American people in their government:

For refusing to pass comprehensive campaign finance reform, thus investing in K Street lobbyists the power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

They have abdicated representative Government, by declaring us out of their Protection, and by enabling economic elites to wage unrelenting class warfare against us.

They are at this time funding large Armies of troops, Blackwater mercenaries, and criminal contractors to complete the works of death, desolation, and war profiteering in Iraq, Afghanistan,and Pakistan under circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy of a civilized nation.

They are allowing inciters of sedition, insurrection, assassination and treason to obstruct reform with threats of violence, they refuse to restore the Fairness Doctrine, thus subjecting an entire nation to the slanders and threats of deranged rightwing extremists parading around as great Americans while betraying everything America has ever stood for.  

In every stage of these Oppressions, progressives have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated betrayals.  A Party, whose character is thus marked by every act which defines craven cowardice and moral bankruptcy, is unfit to be supported by Progressives.

We have reminded Democrats time and time again of our grievances.  We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, we have implored them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably sever our connections and support if they continue.  But they have been deaf to the voice of justice, they have been deaf to our repeated appeals. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity of declaring our Separation, and hold the Democratic Party, as we hold the Republican Party, in contempt, and condemn them both as abusive and corrupt.

We, therefore, the Progressives of the United States of America, across the Netroots Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of History for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name of, and by Authority of the Founding Fathers who gave us this democracy and asked us to preserve it, solemnly publish and declare, that Progressives are, and of Right ought to be a new Political Party, that we are Absolved from all Allegiance to the Democratic Party, and that all political connection between us and the Democratic Party, is and ought to be totally dissolved.  

In support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance upon one another, with unwavering support for the Constitution and the rule of law, we mutually pledge that we will restore American democracy, no matter what sacrifices are required, no matter who stands in our way, no matter how long it takes, because we are Progressives, we are the conscience of America, we are America's future, we are the change Americans can believe in.        

Tags: , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

We have the moral responsibility to restore what has been given to us, (4.00 / 13)
to take back what has been taken away by corrupt politicians of both major parties.

Democrats have one last chance to help us.  If they betray us again we'll know what we have to do.  

 


I admire the Idealism....BUT... (4.00 / 4)


The Two Political Parties (both corrupted by the Robber Baron Monopoly class, the War Rackett Establishment, The CFR and the looting of our Nation for World Corporate Empire goals) fixed the system long ago such that no 3rd Party candidate or Party representatives can ever get into the TV Debates, or get a fair hearing.  In fact, they cannot even get ballot access across 50 States without going through so many major contortions and expenses and Court battles that it sets them up at an insurmountable, futile disadvantage from the beginning.

It does not matter if it is Ralph Nader, Cynthia McKinney, Cindy Sheehan, Ron Paul, Jessie Ventura, Ross Perot, Robert Redford, or whoever....the system is setup by design to obstruct and render futile any grassroots effort to get a 3rd Party candidate a fair shot at the White House.

The better choice here for us is to instead mark out all the Democratic traitors currently in the system and build grassroots efforts up to Primary them and fire their asses.  This means the vacuuous Harry Reids, Nancy Pelosis, as well as the Ben Nelsons, Mary Landrieus, Max Baucus, Joe Liebermans, etc.

It means also marking out early on who we think would be an acceptable public advocate, whom we know that we can trust, for the position of The White House.

If we put a huge grassroots effort behind a Russ Feingold/Dennis Kucinich ticket for 2012, then we would finally get the kind of unwavering integrity, principled leadership, and committment to real policy change and government reform that we all want.

It is very possible to build massive grassroots support for Feingold/Kucinich on the message of real change and then through Primary successes get them into a position where they are in front of the General Electorate in November.

We proved this already by nearly getting Howard Dean elected in 2003-2004, by defeating Joe Leiberman in the Democratic Primaries in 2006, and then by defeating the Media chosen coronated choice of Hillary Clinton in 2007-2008 (and also seeing grassroots candidate Ron Paul earn more delegates the Media-favorite and Media-promoted Rudy Guiliani on the other side). So the grassroots does have some real power here, and it is growing.

Unfortuately, Obama talked a pretty good game but was playing us all for fools the whole entire time. He is not nor will he ever be a change agent. He is incapable of standing up to entrenched power -- rather he seeks their council and advice. His true loyalties were always with (as a CFR elitist Member) the looting Banksters, Wall Street pirates, the Wars and Occupations and Secret Renditions, the Patriot Act obliteration of our Bill of Rights, and protecting the many crimes Cheney/Bush/Rumsfeld/etc..  

But Russ Feingold is really different:
He voted against the U.S. Patriot Act
He voted against the Wars.
He really wants to stop the Wars in Afghanistan as well as Iraq.
He has political integrity (unlike most Senators)
He also is a Midwesterner (good Electoral College fit).

And we all know that Dennis Kucinich is a real fighter who really means what he says, and will stand up when no one else will and call out Cheney and Bush as War Criminals.

So this is how we have to now organize.

We can remake the Democratic Party from within, and cast out the Corporate toadies and political hack-artists.

These are goals that really can be achieved.
A Feingold/Kucinich ticket can reform the Democratic Party and compete on a mostly level playing field in the General Election.

FEINGOLD/KUCINICH 2012 Baby!!!
Vote For Real Change and not more War Hawks and false hope.






"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold, is for
people of good conscience to remain silent."
    --Thomas Jefferson


[ Parent ]
You're analyzing this based upon what's happened in the past. (4.00 / 3)
Sometimes that's valid, sometimes it's not.

Th French aristocracy were telling each other in 1785 that there would never be a revolution in France because there'd never been one before.  So when you tell me 3rd parties can't gain power because 3rd parties in the past haven't been able to, I have to wonder why you think that argument has such merit.

We're in strange new territory here, FreeSociety.  If we're going to get through these crises we're facing, we're going to have to start thinking outside the box, we're going to have to start being innovative and start taking the initiative instead of just reacting to what the political establishment does.  

   


[ Parent ]
Because the Laws prevent competition (4.00 / 1)


The analogy of the French Revolution is a non-sequitor. Back in those days, if you just got enough people together with pitchforks and torches to storm the gates...you had a "Revolution".

In today's time, that same angry mob would face very sophisicated Police Riot Control Chemical Warfare, Taser Guns, automatic revolvers, etc., (and have no chance).  In today's time an entire Ocean no longer separates us from The Empire...instead we are trapped within The Empire itself, and cannot just merely attack their wooden sailing ships and build forts.

We live in a much more complex and impenetrable Orwellian society today.

But back to the essential point, the problem is that the Republican and Democratic Party have FIXED all the Election Laws and Rules to make it impossible for any 3rd Party to enjoy the same ballot access, to gain access to the TV debates, and to possibly compete on a level playing field. It's like giving one team one out-per-inning against a team that has three outs-per-inning and the umpires already on their side.

Just look at all the people who tried it and never even cracked 15% or got any TV time. Do you really think that the Corporate U.S. News Media will ever allow 3rd-Party's into the Debates, and cover their campaigns?  They want to protect the Establishment so much that they even just arbitrarily invent "rules" on the fly to kick out Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel out of the debates to winnow the field (between the pro-status quo candidates -- regardless of how they are polling).

The evidence that 3rd Parties can't get power is there for all to see, and if the rules and laws forbid even the most basic things (like ballot access), and the Media won't even cover it, then we have to choose a more practicle and effective approach.

The fact is, that there are a handful of honest and courageous politicans in the Democratic Party and we in the grassroots need to do a much better job supporting them and elevating them and their causes.  It is far, far more realistic that with a large grassroots effort behind him, we could make Russ Feingold the Democratic Nominee in 2016.  If Obama crashes and burns, then it is possible we can even do this in the 2011-2012 time frame.

When you have real progresive advocates and Independent thinkers of real integrity right within the Democratic Party like Russ Feingold and Dennis Kucinich, then we should be focusing our efforts to make them the standard bearers for The Democratic Party.  

If we do that, our progressive causes will then finally be on TV, and we will have the advocates in positions of power that we don't have now.





"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold, is for
people of good conscience to remain silent."
    --Thomas Jefferson


[ Parent ]
I'm aware of the difficulties. (0.00 / 0)
You don't seem to be aware that Ross Perot got 20 percent of the vote in 1992, at a time when economic conditions were far more stable than they are now.  So don't tell me 3rd parties can't have an impact.  If Perot would have campaigned more effectively and stayed on message, he would have won 30 percent or more of the vote.            

The point you can't seem to grasp is that we're heading into strange new territory, Free Society.  Many of the old rules of politics are not going to apply anymore.  The corporate media is no longer trusted, so corporate media bias against a 3rd party could well expand support for it, not diminish it.      

Furthermore, if you truly understood the lessons of history, you would not be claiming that the French Revolution is a non-sequitor.  Too many people trot out that label when they don't understand the point being made.  


[ Parent ]
New Old Territory (4.00 / 1)


I agree with you about Ross Perot.  Had he not quit the race and then reentered, and just stayed on message, he would have got about 30%.  But it is also true that Perot was a unique case because he was a multi-billionaire who could just drop 15-20 million dollars of his own money into the race as if it were just a penny to you and me.  In addition, the cost of Elections way back in 1992 was only 30 million for the entire campaign.  But by 2000, that figure rose to approx. 100 million, and last year Obama had run a record $300 million dollar campaign (with mostly Corporate money). A 3rd Party cannot come even close to competing unless they are Ross Perot (his money chest).

And, while it is true that the Media is not trusted very much, they still control the National Dialog to a large degree.  Most people do not have the free time available to research news stories by themselves on the Internet, or sit around and blog.  They get informed by the drips and drabs of various News headlines coming from the traditional sources (TV, Radio, Newspaper Front Pages).

And as radio host Randi Rhodes once said, "if it isn't on TV it didn't happen". Far too many Americans get their information exclusively from TV, which is also why they know all about the details of Britany Spears, Jennifer Aniston, Brad Pitt, K-Fed, Michael Jackson, etc. and very, very little about how their own Civil Liberties and the public U.S. Treasury have both been dismantled and stolen away from them.

The New territory that we are heading into is as old as the ancient World. It's called Tyranny.  We are slowly becoming serfs and slaves trapped in a kind of high-technology feudal system. It is a society organized upon War, Looting, Police-State, Government-Corporate privilege, War profiteering, hording of Global Resources, and Worldwide violence -- both physical and economic.

But my point is simply this, which is more likely?

A. Howard Dean gets elected as some 3rd Party candidate
B. Howard Dean gets elected as the Dem-Party candidate

or

A. Ron Paul gets elected as some 3rd Party candidate
B. Ron Paul gets elected as a Repub-Party candidate

Well, Ron Paul tried both, and got a lot farther (and had more coverage and impact) with the second option.  Howard Dean came very, very close to being an unstopable juggernaut in 2004 (second option). Had he just stayed on-message a little more (right before Iowa) and not gotten himself drawn in a TV-Ad War with Richard Gephart .. who knows?  We were that close.

So we can build upon those successes or near successes, and work to boost the passionate progressive candidates and make them the standard bearers of the Party.

A lot of people thought that Obama was more "liberal" than John Kerry and Al Gore (probably a false assumption because he quoted from Martin L. King). But he never, ever was. He was always at the service of the Establishment. He was always decidely a "don't rock the boat", word parsing, charlatan.

Yet Obama would never have defeated Hillary in the first place, without the grassroots helping him each step of the way and by making him a "Star". This illustrates the power that we have within the Democratic Party.

Unfortunately we all just backed the wrong horse in 2008.
We should have all put all that time and passion and energy that we wasted away on Barack Rahm Emanuel Obama -- into someone like Dennis Kucinich in 2008 -- who really means what he says, and really shook up the political system.

This is within our grasp.




"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold, is for
people of good conscience to remain silent."
    --Thomas Jefferson


[ Parent ]
Both Free's & Rusty's ideas... (4.00 / 1)
...are good.  I tend to feel TPTB in the DLC and Dem Establishment wouldn't allow a Fein/Kuc ticket either; they'd find some way in their bag of virutally limitless tricks to subvert it.

But the times are so dire, why don't we start by working for both ideas?  

I only know we need to do away with the current system.  

The fierce urgency of now.  Martin


[ Parent ]
I agree (4.00 / 2)


It is not incompatible to work both fronts.

We need to help out and work on behalf of the few courageous people within the Democratic Party and elevate them and make them the standard bearers of the Party. We almost got Howard Dean the Democratic Presidential Nominee in 2004 with the grassroots power that we had.

Trying to build parallel outside movements and 3rd Parties are also complimentary to this.  But we will need to first get the Election Laws changed, and the Political Debate rules changed, before these efforts can have any hope of returning any real returns for us.

We might be able to do the latter, if we first to the former -- and get a Russ Feingold or a Dennis Kucinich type of person in the White House who really is interested in government transparency and civil liberties (unlike Obama)




"All tyranny needs to gain a foothold, is for
people of good conscience to remain silent."
    --Thomas Jefferson


[ Parent ]
Nice work, Rusty! (4.00 / 6)
I don't think there's any "if" left about it though. It's what they do, it seems...

Are you posting this in orange too? ;-)


Yes, I'll be posting this in orange as soon as my new screen name, (4.00 / 6)
DHinMI is a FUCKING IDIOT makes it through the registration process.  

[ Parent ]
Heh!! (4.00 / 2)
I knew that... ;-)

[ Parent ]
Make "1st Party" (4.00 / 2)
one of the tags, too...

[ Parent ]
1st Party added to tags. (4.00 / 1)


[ Parent ]
Heh! (4.00 / 1)
Well... I meant in orange. ;-)

[ Parent ]
Oh . . . (4.00 / 1)
I'll add it there too, along with a whole bunch of other tags descriptive of degenerate Democrats and their clap louder clerks at DKos.

[ Parent ]
Where do I sign? (4.00 / 5)
This is magnificent, Rusty.  I fully agree this is a valid approach to take.

If I may make so bold, a couple of editing suggestions:

1) Para 3 in the declaration:  Add "the Constitution and the"

progessive values
"upon which it was founded."

2) Para with the phrase "bi-partisan quagmire."  Your saying the "sole purpose" was to annoy progressives is too limited.

3) Editing and organizing the list/lists of abuses and crimes could make it more clear and forceful.

4) Add Pakistan to the war crimes paragraph (6th para up from bottom).

I hope you won't find my suggestions presumptuous.  You may not agree with them, which is fine.  I try not to be overly attached to my ideas!  I only feel this work is so good that excellence and polishing are warranted.  

The fierce urgency of now.  Martin


Good suggestions, dharmasyd, I made changes in accordance with (4.00 / 4)
1, 2, and 4.  Regarding 3, I'll look over that list and see if I can organize it differently.  

Thomas Jefferson made some changes in the Declaration of Independence when Benjamin Franklin and John Adams tipped and recced it while also suggesting improvements.  If Jefferson could welcome the advice of a couple of guys who weren't even poets, I can certainly welcome your advice.    


[ Parent ]
You are too kind... (4.00 / 2)
It's all in the noble effort to get our country back!  

The fierce urgency of now.  Martin

[ Parent ]
ill second syd (4.00 / 3)
as i read this, i immediately thot... this needs to be blasted ALL OVER the blogoshere. and then some.

well done.

No justice, no peace.


It's good to see you back, Lady Libertine. (4.00 / 2)

I'm not as good at communicating information as your husband is, but I'm going to keep trying to get my point across.

Heh.  



[ Parent ]
lol (4.00 / 2)
he can do email but he doesnt know a blog from a frog... heh.

No justice, no peace.

[ Parent ]
Sometimes... (4.00 / 2)
...but rarely, a blog can seem much like a frog!

The fierce urgency of now.  Martin

[ Parent ]
Just show me where to sign .n/t (4.00 / 2)


Visit The Dream Antilles, a Lit Blog.

And to keep church and state affairs seperate. This is (4.00 / 3)
an absolute must.  No more do I want to hear about Christian fundamentalists or that Mitt is a Mormon or the President a Muslim.  It doesn't matter in america.  The beast of religion needs to stay caged.

Learn to love.

The Founding Fathers understood the necessity of church and state (4.00 / 3)
separation, but too many Americans don't.  I think the religious right has lost it's influence, so the Pat Robertson's et al aren't the threat they used to be, but we can't ever let down our guard.    

[ Parent ]
Thanks for the bump, Buhdy. (4.00 / 1)
Have the exotic dancers I sent to help you celebrate your birthday arrived yet?


i'm thinking about... (4.00 / 1)
...joining the Working Families Party.

They have a chapter here in Oregon.

Any thoughts?

Anyone?

Sit Out The Vote  no vote = no confidence


Please consider this my electronic signature (0.00 / 0)
"Surely, we will all hang separately if we do not all hang together" -B. Franklin

"Nobody made a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could only do a little."  -Edmund Burke

March on Washington
Saturday, March 20
 

 

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?

Contact Us

Seek




Advanced Search


Contribute to Docudharma
 

 
     

 

DharmaDocs
- Mission Statement
- FAQ
- HTML Help
- Dharmapedia
- Series
www.flickr.com

Action

Powered by: SoapBlox